Literature DB >> 24094657

Urinary outcomes are significantly affected by nerve sparing quality during radical prostatectomy.

Deborah R Kaye1, M Eric Hyndman, Robert L Segal, Lynda Z Mettee, Bruce J Trock, Zhaoyong Feng, Li-Ming Su, Trinity J Bivalacqua, Christian P Pavlovich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of nerve sparing (NS) quality on self-reported patient urinary outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: A total of 102 preoperatively potent men underwent laparoscopic or robotic radical prostatectomy; NS was prospectively graded at surgery using a 0-4 scale/neurovascular bundle. Urinary functional outcomes were measured by validated Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire at baseline and follow-up time points (1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months) in 99 men who underwent various degrees of NS. Mixed linear regression was used to analyze the effect of NS quality and other clinical factors on urinary outcomes.
RESULTS: Patients with at least 1 neurovascular bundle spared completely, along with its supportive tissues (NS grade 4/4), noted significantly improved Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary functional and continence outcomes as early as 1 month postoperatively and up to 12 months. Significantly less urinary bother was also noted in these men by 9-12 months postoperatively. Multivariate analysis revealed that bilateral or unilateral excellent NS (at least 1 bundle graded 4/4), increasing time from surgery, young patient age, and lower body mass index positively and significantly affected urinary functional outcomes, including pad use. Men who received excellent unilateral NS recovered urinary function about as well as men who had both neurovascular bundles spared in similar fashion.
CONCLUSION: The quality of NS significantly influences patient-defined urinary functional convalescence. Completely sparing at least 1 neurovascular bundle along with its supportive tissues has a dramatic effect on the recovery of urinary continence and quality of life in preoperatively potent men.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24094657     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.06.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

1.  Do we need the nerve sparing radical prostatectomy techniques (intrafascial vs. interfascial) in men with erectile dysfunction? Results of a single-centre study.

Authors:  Wael Y Khoder; Raphaela Waidelich; Michael Seitz; Armin J Becker; Alexander Buchner; Stefan Trittschler; Christian G Stief
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Nightly sildenafil use after radical prostatectomy has adverse effects on urinary convalescence: Results from a randomized trial of nightly vs on-demand dosing regimens.

Authors:  Matthew Eric Hyndman; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Lynda Z Mettee; Li-Ming Su; Bruce J Trock; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Predictors of early continence following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hugo Lavigueur-Blouin; Alina Camacho Noriega; Roger Valdivieso; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Marc Bienz; Naif Alhathal; Mathieu Latour; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Association between masturbation and functional outcome in the postoperative course after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Valentin H Meissner; Sonja Dumler; Martina Kron; Stefan Schiele; Veronika E Goethe; Andreas Bannowsky; Jürgen E Gschwend; Kathleen Herkommer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-06

Review 5.  [Radical prostatectomy in a certified prostate cancer center: medical treatment and outcome].

Authors:  J Kranz; O Deserno; K Fischer; P Anheuser; B Reisch; J Steffens
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Regenerative Medicine for Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: Are we Ready?

Authors:  Maarten Albersen; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 8.143

7.  Prospective evaluation of vesicourethral anastomosis outcomes in robotic radical prostatectomy during early experience in a university hospital.

Authors:  Lucas Medeiros Burttet; Gabrielle Aguiar Varaschin; Andre Kives Berger; Leandro Totti Cavazzola; Milton Berger; Brasil Silva
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

8.  Comparison of Functional Outcome after Extended versus Super-Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection during Radical Prostatectomy in High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Heikki Seikkula; Pieter Janssen; Manuela Tutolo; Lorenzo Tosco; Antonino Battaglia; Lisa Moris; Thomas Van den Broeck; Maarten Albersen; Gert De Meerleer; Hendrik Van Poppel; Wouter Everaerts; Steven Joniau
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Application of Dried Human Amnion Graft to Improve Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence and Potency: A Randomized Exploration Study Protocol.

Authors:  Dimitri Barski; Holger Gerullis; Thorsten Ecke; Mihaly Boros; Jan Brune; Ulrich Beutner; Igor Tsaur; Albert Ramon; Thomas Otto
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Intravesical prostatic protrusion may affect early postoperative continence undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Katsuya Hikita; Masashi Honda; Shogo Teraoka; Ryoma Nishikawa; Yuske Kimura; Panagiota Tsounapi; Hideto Iwamoto; Shuichi Morizane; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.