Literature DB >> 25152473

The challenge of achieving 1% operative mortality for coronary artery bypass grafting: a multi-institution Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database analysis.

Damien J LaPar1, Giovanni Filardo2, Ivan K Crosby1, Alan M Speir3, Jeffrey B Rich4, Irving L Kron1, Gorav Ailawadi5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cardiothoracic surgical leadership recently challenged the surgical community to achieve an operative mortality rate of 1.0% for the performance of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The possibility of achieving this goal remains unknown due to the increasing number of high-risk patients being referred for CABG. The purpose of our study was to identify a patient population in which this operative mortality goal is achievable relative to the estimated operative risk.
METHODS: Patient records from a multi-institution (17 centers) Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database for primary, isolated CABG operations (2001-2012) were analyzed. Multiple logistic regression modeling with spline functions for calculated STS predicted risk of mortality (PROM) was used to rigorously assess the relationship between estimated patient risk and operative mortality, adjusted for operative year and surgeon volume.
RESULTS: A total of 34,416 patients (average patient age, 63.9 ± 10.7 years; 27% [n = 9190] women) incurred an operative mortality rate of 1.87%. Median STS predicted risk of mortality was 1.06% (interquartile range, 0.60%-2.13%) and median surgeon CABG volume was 544 (interquartile range, 303-930) operations over the study period. After risk adjustment for the confounding influence of surgeon volume and operative year, the association between STS PROM and operative mortality was highly significant (P < .0001). More importantly, the adjusted spline function revealed that an STS PROM threshold value of 1.27% correlated with a 1.0% probability of death, accounting for 57.3% (n = 19,720) of the total study population. Further, the STS PROM demonstrated a limited predictive capacity for operative mortality for STS PROM > 25% as observed to expected mortality began to diverge.
CONCLUSIONS: Achieving the goal of 1.0% operative mortality for primary, isolated CABG is feasible in appropriately selected patients in the modern surgical era. However, this goal may be achieved in only 60% of CABG patients without other improvements in processes of care. Calculated STS PROM can be used to strongly identify patients with estimated mortality risk <1.27% to achieve this goal, but it appears limited in its predictive capacity for those patients with estimated risk >25.0%. These data provide a foundation for further study to determine if 1.0% mortality for CABG is achievable nationwide.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25152473      PMCID: PMC4764380          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  17 in total

Review 1.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: the myth, the logic and the science.

Authors:  Dumbor L Ngaage
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Early mortality from off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery in Canada: a comparison of the STS and the EuroSCORE risk prediction algorithms.

Authors:  Forough Farrokhyar; Xiaoyin Wang; Rosanne Kent; Andre Lamy
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.223

3.  Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical analysis.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Using Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk models for risk-adjusting cardiac surgery results.

Authors:  Ruyun Jin; Anthony P Furnary; Stephanie C Fine; Eugene H Blackstone; Gary L Grunkemeier
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Association of hospital coronary artery bypass volume with processes of care, mortality, morbidity, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons composite quality score.

Authors:  David M Shahian; Sean M O'Brien; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Eric D Peterson; Fred H Edwards
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Present-at-admission diagnoses improve mortality risk adjustment and allow more accurate assessment of the relationship between volume of lung cancer operations and mortality risk.

Authors:  George J Stukenborg; Kerry L Kilbridge; Douglas P Wagner; Frank E Harrell; M Norman Oliver; Jason A Lyman; Jonathan S Einbinder; Alfred F Connors
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008.

Authors:  Andrew J Epstein; Daniel Polsky; Feifei Yang; Lin Yang; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Off-pump coronary artery bypass disproportionately benefits high-risk patients.

Authors:  John D Puskas; Vinod H Thourani; Patrick Kilgo; William Cooper; Thomas Vassiliades; J David Vega; Cullen Morris; Edward Chen; Brian J Schmotzer; Robert A Guyton; Omar M Lattouf
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Marie-Claude Morice; A Pieter Kappetein; Antonio Colombo; David R Holmes; Michael J Mack; Elisabeth Ståhle; Ted E Feldman; Marcel van den Brand; Eric J Bass; Nic Van Dyck; Katrin Leadley; Keith D Dawkins; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

Authors:  David M Shahian; Sean M O'Brien; Giovanni Filardo; Victor A Ferraris; Constance K Haan; Jeffrey B Rich; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Elizabeth R DeLong; Cynthia M Shewan; Rachel S Dokholyan; Eric D Peterson; Fred H Edwards; Richard P Anderson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  9 in total

1.  Current quality reporting methods are not adequate for salvage cardiac operations.

Authors:  William Z Chancellor; J Hunter Mehaffey; Jared P Beller; Elizabeth D Krebs; Robert B Hawkins; Kenan Yount; Clifford E Fonner; Alan M Speir; Mohammed A Quader; Jeffrey B Rich; Leora T Yarboro; Nicholas R Teman; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Hypothyroidism is a Risk Factor for Atrial Fibrillation after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft.

Authors:  Marisol Carreno Jaimes; Luis Alberto Arciniegas Torrado; Néstor Fernando Sandoval Reyes; Jaime Camacho Mackenzie; Juan Pablo Umana Mallarino
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

Review 3.  Commentary: When will the robots come marching in?

Authors:  Evan P Rotar; Irving L Kron
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 1.778

4.  Avoiding Heparinization of Arterial Line and Maintaining Acceptable Arterial Waveform After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Azin Alizadehasl; Mohsen Ziyaeifard; Mohammadmehdi Peighambari; Rasoul Azarfarin; Ghodrat Golbargian; Hooman Bakhshandeh
Journal:  Res Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-08-01

5.  Comparing Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Among Large Teaching and Urban Hospitals in China and the United States.

Authors:  Zhe Zheng; Heng Zhang; Xin Yuan; Chenfei Rao; Yan Zhao; Yun Wang; Sharon-Lise Normand; Harlan M Krumholz; Shengshou Hu
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-06

6.  Coronary surgery in women: How can we improve outcomes.

Authors:  Brittany A Zwischenberger; Oliver K Jawitz; Jennifer S Lawton
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-10-02

Review 7.  Physiology of in-situ arterial revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting: Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors and influences.

Authors:  T Bruce Ferguson
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-26

8.  Commentary: Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Darkness cannot drive out darkness.

Authors:  Dominique Vervoort; Tom C Nguyen
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 6.439

9.  Mortality risk prediction in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: Are traditional risk scores accurate?

Authors:  Maxim Goncharov; Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejia; Camila Perez de Souza Arthur; Bianca Maria Maglia Orlandi; Alexandre Sousa; Marco Antônio Praça Oliveira; Fernando Antibas Atik; Rodrigo Coelho Segalote; Marcos Gradim Tiveron; Pedro Gabriel Melo de Barros E Silva; Marcelo Arruda Nakazone; Luiz Augusto Ferreira Lisboa; Luís Alberto Oliveira Dallan; Zhe Zheng; Shengshou Hu; Fabio Biscegli Jatene
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.