William Z Chancellor1, J Hunter Mehaffey2, Jared P Beller1, Elizabeth D Krebs1, Robert B Hawkins2, Kenan Yount1, Clifford E Fonner3, Alan M Speir4, Mohammed A Quader5, Jeffrey B Rich3, Leora T Yarboro1, Nicholas R Teman1, Gorav Ailawadi6. 1. Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va. 2. Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va; Center for Health Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va. 3. Virginia Cardiac Services Quality Initiative, Virginia Beach, Va. 4. INOVA Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Va. 5. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Va. 6. Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va. Electronic address: gorav@virginia.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Outcomes in cardiac surgery are benchmarked against national Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) data and include patients undergoing elective, urgent, emergent, and salvage operations. This practice relies on accurate risk adjustment to avoid risk-averse behavior. We hypothesize that the STS risk calculator does not adequately characterize the risk of salvage operations because of their heterogeneity and infrequent occurrence. METHODS: Data on all cardiac surgery patients with an STS predicted risk score (2002-2017) were extracted from a regional database of 19 cardiac surgery centers. Patients were stratified according to operative status for univariate analysis. Observed-to-expected (O:E) ratios for mortality and composite morbidity/mortality were calculated and compared among elective, urgent, emergent, and salvage patients. RESULTS: A total of 76,498 patients met inclusion criteria. The O:E mortality ratios for elective, urgent, and emergent cases were 0.96, 0.98, and 0.93, respectively (all P values > .05). However, mortality rate was significantly higher than expected for salvage patients (O:E ratio, 1.41; P = .04). Composite morbidity/mortality rate was lower than expected in elective (O:E ratio, 0.81; P = .0001) and urgent (O:E ratio, 0.93; P = .0001) cases but higher for emergent (O:E ratio, 1.13; P = .0006) and salvage (O:E ratio, 1.24; P = .01). O:E ratios for salvage mortality were highly variable among each of the 19 centers. CONCLUSIONS: The current STS risk models do not adequately predict outcomes for salvage cardiac surgery patients. On the basis of these results, we recommend more detailed reporting of salvage outcomes to avoid risk aversion in these potentially life-saving operations.
OBJECTIVES: Outcomes in cardiac surgery are benchmarked against national Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) data and include patients undergoing elective, urgent, emergent, and salvage operations. This practice relies on accurate risk adjustment to avoid risk-averse behavior. We hypothesize that the STS risk calculator does not adequately characterize the risk of salvage operations because of their heterogeneity and infrequent occurrence. METHODS: Data on all cardiac surgery patients with an STS predicted risk score (2002-2017) were extracted from a regional database of 19 cardiac surgery centers. Patients were stratified according to operative status for univariate analysis. Observed-to-expected (O:E) ratios for mortality and composite morbidity/mortality were calculated and compared among elective, urgent, emergent, and salvage patients. RESULTS: A total of 76,498 patients met inclusion criteria. The O:E mortality ratios for elective, urgent, and emergent cases were 0.96, 0.98, and 0.93, respectively (all P values > .05). However, mortality rate was significantly higher than expected for salvage patients (O:E ratio, 1.41; P = .04). Composite morbidity/mortality rate was lower than expected in elective (O:E ratio, 0.81; P = .0001) and urgent (O:E ratio, 0.93; P = .0001) cases but higher for emergent (O:E ratio, 1.13; P = .0006) and salvage (O:E ratio, 1.24; P = .01). O:E ratios for salvage mortality were highly variable among each of the 19 centers. CONCLUSIONS: The current STS risk models do not adequately predict outcomes for salvage cardiac surgery patients. On the basis of these results, we recommend more detailed reporting of salvage outcomes to avoid risk aversion in these potentially life-saving operations.
Authors: John D Puskas; Patrick D Kilgo; Vinod H Thourani; Omar M Lattouf; Edward Chen; J David Vega; William Cooper; Robert A Guyton; Michael Halkos Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: David M Shahian; Fred H Edwards; Victor A Ferraris; Constance K Haan; Jeffrey B Rich; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Elizabeth R DeLong; Sean M O'Brien; Cynthia M Shewan; Rachel S Dokholyan; Eric D Peterson Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Sean M O'Brien; David M Shahian; Elizabeth R DeLong; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Fred H Edwards; Victor A Ferraris; Constance K Haan; Jeffrey B Rich; Cynthia M Shewan; Rachel S Dokholyan; Richard P Anderson; Eric D Peterson Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Brian R Englum; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; David M Shahian; Sean M O'Brien; J Matthew Brennan; Fred H Edwards; Eric D Peterson Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2015-01-09 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Stephen W Waldo; James M McCabe; Cashel O'Brien; Kevin F Kennedy; Karen E Joynt; Robert W Yeh Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Matthew W Sherwood; J Matthew Brennan; Kalon K Ho; Frederick A Masoudi; John C Messenger; W Douglas Weaver; David Dai; Eric D Peterson Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Giuseppe Santarpino; Vito G Ruggieri; Giovanni Mariscalco; Karl Bounader; Cesare Beghi; Theodor Fischlein; Francesco Onorati; Giuseppe Faggian; Giuseppe Gatti; Aniello Pappalardo; Marisa De Feo; Ciro Bancone; Andrea Perrotti; Sidney Chocron; Magnus Dalen; Peter Svenarud; Antonino S Rubino; Carmelo Mignosa; Riccardo Gherli; Francesco Musumeci; Angelo M Dell'Aquila; Eeva-Maija Kinnunen; Fausto Biancari Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 2.778