Literature DB >> 14500075

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: the myth, the logic and the science.

Dumbor L Ngaage1.   

Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting is a highly investigated surgical procedure and yet continues to attract rigorous research aimed at reducing observed and potential morbidity and mortality. Improvements in perioperative care, surgical technique and methods of attenuating the untoward effects of cardiopulmonary bypass have resulted in improved clinical outcome of on-pump myocardial revascularisation. The continuing drive to improve clinical outcome and compete with the ever-evolving non-surgical methods of myocardial revascularisation has provided the incentive for the rebirth of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). The appeal of avoiding cardiopulmonary pass with its direct and indirect physiological insult, the prospect of improved clinical outcomes, and the favourable economic impact gives OPCAB the potential of preference that may mark the dawn of a new era in our search for the optimal surgical strategy for the treatment of coronary artery disease. However, there are very genuine and serious concerns with this surgical technique. The logical appeal of OPCAB can only be validated by scientific scrutiny otherwise it would remain a myth. This comprehensive review examines the "physiological cost" of cardiopulmonary bypass, the theoretical and clinical benefits of OPCAB, the concerns with this technique and strategies for maximizing the benefits. And in so doing, explore the myth, the logic and the science of this surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14500075     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00381-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  5 in total

1.  The challenge of achieving 1% operative mortality for coronary artery bypass grafting: a multi-institution Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database analysis.

Authors:  Damien J LaPar; Giovanni Filardo; Ivan K Crosby; Alan M Speir; Jeffrey B Rich; Irving L Kron; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Is off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting superior to conventional bypass in octogenarians?

Authors:  Damien J LaPar; Castigliano M Bhamidipati; T Brett Reece; Joseph C Cleveland; Irving L Kron; Gorav Ailawadi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Early outcomes in the elderly: a meta-analysis of 4921 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting--comparison between off-pump and on-pump techniques.

Authors:  S S Panesar; T Athanasiou; S Nair; C Rao; C Jones; M Nicolaou; A Darzi
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in acute coronary syndrome: a clinical analysis.

Authors:  Kaan Kaya; Raif Cavolli; Alpaslan Telli; Mehmet Fazil Tolga Soyal; Alp Aslan; Gökhan Gokaslan; Sahin Mursel; Refik Tasoz
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with ropivacaine and fentanyl in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Mikhail Y Kirov; Alexey V Eremeev; Alexey A Smetkin; Lars J Bjertnaes
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.