Literature DB >> 28550589

Carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography as an option for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Chiara De Angelis1, Francesco Sardanelli2,3, Matteo Perego4, Marco Alì5, Francesco Casilli6, Luigi Inglese7, Giovanni Mauri2,8.   

Abstract

To assess feasibility, efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide (CO2) digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to guide endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in a cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). After Ethical Committee approval, the records of 13 patients (all male, mean age 74.6 ± 8.0 years) with CKD, who underwent EVAR to exclude an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) under CO2 angiography guidance, were reviewed. The AAA to be excluded had a mean diameter of 52.0 ± 8.0 mm. CO2 angiography was performed by automatic (n = 7) or hand (n = 6) injection. The endograft was correctly placed and the AAA was excluded in all cases, without any surgical conversions. Two patients (15.4%) had an endoleak: one type-Ia, detected by CO2-DSA and effectively treated with prosthesis dilatation; one type-III, detected by CO2-DSA, confirmed using 10 ml of ICM, and conservatively managed. In one patient, CO2 angiograms were considered of too low quality for guiding the procedure and 200 ml of ICM were administered. Overall, 11 patients (84.6%) underwent a successful EVAR under the guidance of the sole CO2 angiography. No patients suffered from major complications, including those typically CO2-related. Two patients suffered from abdominal pain during the procedure secondary to a transient splanchnic perfusion's reduction due to CO2, and one patient had a worsening of renal function probably caused by a cholesterol embolization during the procedure. In patients with CKD, EVAR under CO2 angiography guidance is feasible, effective, and safe.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA); Angiography; Carbon dioxide (CO2); Chronic kidney disease (CKD); Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR); Iodinated contrast material (ICM)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28550589     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-017-1175-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  23 in total

1.  Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  David Sacks; Tricia E McClenny; John F Cardella; Curtis A Lewis
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with carbon dioxide-guided angiography in patients with renal insufficiency.

Authors:  Enrique Criado; Gilbert R Upchurch; Kate Young; John E Rectenwald; Dawn M Coleman; Jonathon L Eliason; Guillermo A Escobar
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 3.  Carbon dioxide (CO2) digital subtraction angiography: 26-year experience at the University of Florida.

Authors:  I F Hawkins; J G Caridi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The cerebrovascular effects of intraarterial CO2 in quantities required for diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  R Coffey; R G Quisling; J P Mickle; I F Hawkins; W B Ballinger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Contrast alternatives for iodinated contrast allergy and renal dysfunction: options and limitations.

Authors:  Gregory J Nadolski; S William Stavropoulos
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Carbon dioxide as a contrast agent to guide vascular interventional procedures.

Authors:  D J Eschelman; K L Sullivan; J Bonn; G A Gardiner
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Carbon-dioxide-guided vascular interventions: technique and pitfalls.

Authors:  David O Kessel; Iain Robertson; Jai Patel; Kevin Peters; Edward J Taylor; Lucy J Denton; Balbir Bambhra
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2002-07-23       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Acute renal failure after endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Ron Wald; Sushrut S Waikar; Orfeas Liangos; Brian J G Pereira; Glenn M Chertow; Bertrand L Jaber
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy with carbon dioxide versus iodinated contrast material in the imaging of hemodialysis access fistulas.

Authors:  K O Ehrman; T E Taber; G M Gaylord; P B Brown; J P Hage
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 10.  Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography: expanding applications and technical evolution.

Authors:  S R Kerns; I F Hawkins
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Amer Alaiti; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Can CO2 Be a Savior for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Candidates with Renal Dysfunction? Critical Tips for Safe CO2 Angiography.

Authors:  Kyung Jae Cho
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2020-06-30

3.  Digital Variance Angiography in Lower-Limb Angiography with Metal Implants.

Authors:  M B Bastian; A M König; S Viniol; M Gyánó; D Szöllősi; I Góg; J P Kiss; S Osvath; K Szigeti; A H Mahnken; R P Thomas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.740

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.