Literature DB >> 26360155

Foveal input is not required for perception of crowd facial expression.

Benjamin A Wolfe, Anna A Kosovicheva, Allison Yamanashi Leib, Katherine Wood, David Whitney.   

Abstract

The visual system extracts average features from groups of objects (Ariely, 2001; Dakin & Watt, 1997; Watamaniuk & Sekuler, 1992), including high-level stimuli such as faces (Haberman & Whitney, 2007, 2009). This phenomenon, known as ensemble perception, implies a covert process, which would not require fixation of individual stimulus elements. However, some evidence suggests that ensemble perception may instead be a process of averaging foveal input across sequential fixations (Ji, Chen, & Fu, 2013; Jung, Bulthoff, Thornton, Lee, & Armann, 2013). To test directly whether foveating objects is necessary, we measured observers' sensitivity to average facial emotion in the absence of foveal input. Subjects viewed arrays of 24 faces, either in the presence or absence of a gaze-contingent foveal occluder, and adjusted a test face to match the average expression of the array. We found no difference in accuracy between the occluded and non-occluded conditions, demonstrating that foveal input is not required for ensemble perception. Unsurprisingly, without foveal input, subjects spent significantly less time directly fixating faces, but this did not translate into any difference in sensitivity to ensemble expression. Next, we varied the number of faces visible from the set to test whether subjects average multiple faces from the crowd. In both conditions, subjects' performance improved as more faces were presented, indicating that subjects integrated information from multiple faces in the display regardless of whether they had access to foveal information. Our results demonstrate that ensemble perception can be a covert process, not requiring access to direct foveal information.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26360155      PMCID: PMC4570731          DOI: 10.1167/15.4.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  30 in total

1.  Identification of facial images in peripheral vision.

Authors:  P Mäkelä; R Näsänen; J Rovamo; D Melmoth
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The effect of contrast and size scaling on face perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision.

Authors:  D R Melmoth; H T Kukkonen; P K Mäkelä; J M Rovamo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.

Authors:  L Parkes; J Lund; A Angelucci; J A Solomon; M Morgan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties.

Authors:  D Ariely
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-03

5.  Representation of statistical properties.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Anne Treisman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Rapid extraction of mean identity from sets of faces.

Authors:  Jan de Fockert; Cecilia Wolfenstein
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 7.  Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition.

Authors:  George A Alvarez
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Averaging facial expression over time.

Authors:  Jason Haberman; Tom Harp; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Holistic crowding of Mooney faces.

Authors:  Faraz Farzin; Susan M Rivera; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 10.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition.

Authors:  David Whitney; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  9 in total

1.  Serial dependence in the perception of visual variance.

Authors:  Marta Suárez-Pinilla; Anil K Seth; Warrick Roseboom
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Modeling mean estimation tasks in within-trial and across-trial contexts.

Authors:  Ke Tong; Chad Dubé
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.157

Review 3.  Synergy between research on ensemble perception, data visualization, and statistics education: A tutorial review.

Authors:  Lucy Cui; Zili Liu
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Perceptual effects of fast and automatic visual ensemble statistics from faces in individuals with typical development and autism spectrum conditions.

Authors:  Mrinmoy Chakrabarty; Makoto Wada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Peripheral vision in real-world tasks: A systematic review.

Authors:  Christian Vater; Benjamin Wolfe; Ruth Rosenholtz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-05-17

6.  Contribution of a common ability in average and variability judgments.

Authors:  Oakyoon Cha; Randolph Blake; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-19

7.  Holistic ensemble perception.

Authors:  Linfeng Han; Allison Yamanashi Leib; Zhimin Chen; David Whitney
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Spatial limitations in averaging social cues.

Authors:  Joseph Florey; Colin W G Clifford; Steven Dakin; Isabelle Mareschal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Encoding perceptual ensembles during visual search in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Ömer Daglar Tanrikulu; Andrey Chetverikov; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.