Literature DB >> 2512159

Importance of blood volume cultured in the detection of bacteremia.

M Arpi1, M W Bentzon, J Jensen, W Frederiksen.   

Abstract

The influence of the volume of blood cultured on the rate of detection of bacteremia was evaluated in a routine 12-tube blood culture system using 1693 samples from 1502 patients. Blood samples were drawn simultaneously into two transport tubes. The blood volume cultured was the only varying parameter. Generally, 17% more cultures with clinically significant microorganisms (both Enterobacteriaceae and gram-positive cocci) were found when blood from two instead of one tube was used (in most cases comparing 13-16 ml of blood with 6.5-8 ml). Of the most prevalent species, the maximum average extra yield was observed for Staphylococcus aureus (26%) followed by Escherichia coli (16%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (12%). In adults most cases of bacteremia are low-grade. The grade of bacteremia in our patient population was on average as low as 0.25 CFU/ml blood. Therefore, all patients suspected of having bacteremia should have the benefit of a sufficient volume of blood cultured. Since the volume of blood cultured seems to be the single most important factor in the detection of bacteremia, it is imperative that the volume is the same in comparative studies of different blood culture systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2512159     DOI: 10.1007/bf02185857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  19 in total

Review 1.  Blood cultures: principles and techniques.

Authors:  J A Washington
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Quantitative blood cultures in childhood bacteremia.

Authors:  W A Durbin; E G Szymczak; D A Goldmann
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Specimen volume versus yield in the BACTEC blood culture system.

Authors:  J J Plorde; F C Tenover; L G Carlson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Etiologic importance of coagulase-negative Micrococcaceae isolated from blood cultures.

Authors:  B G Hansen
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B       Date:  1985-02

5.  Comparative analysis of two blood culture systems (Isolator and a 12-tube system) by cumulative differences in detection power at different times during incubation.

Authors:  M Arpi; J Prag; S S Schrøder; M W Bentzon; W Frederiksen
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.205

6.  Effect of volume of blood cultured on detection of bacteremia.

Authors:  M M Hall; D M Ilstrup; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  A comparison of a conventional and a radio-metric examination of clinical blood cultures with respect to recovery rate and detection time of microorganisms.

Authors:  M Arpi; A Lester; W Frederiksen
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B       Date:  1985-08

Review 8.  Gram-negative bacteremia. III. Reassessment of etiology, epidemiology and ecology in 612 patients.

Authors:  B E Kreger; D E Craven; P C Carling; W R McCabe
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Microbiological and clinical evaluation of the isolator lysis-centrifugation blood culture tube.

Authors:  N K Henry; C A McLimans; A J Wright; R L Thompson; W R Wilson; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  A study of bacteremias in Denmark from 1977-1978.

Authors:  B Bruun; K Sloth; M W Bentzon; W Frederiksen
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B       Date:  1982-08
View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  L G Reimer; M L Wilson; M P Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  An international multicenter study of blood culture practices. The International Collaborative Blood Culture Study Group.

Authors:  J A Washington
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Bacteraemia in man and animals: an overview.

Authors:  J Vaid
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of SeptiFast multi-pathogen real-time PCR in the setting of suspected healthcare-associated bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Geoffrey Warhurst; Satanayarana Maddi; Graham Dunn; Murad Ghrew; Paul Chadwick; Peter Alexander; Andrew Bentley; John Moore; Michael Sharman; Gordon L Carlson; Duncan Young; Paul Dark
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Detection kinetics for positive blood culture bottles by using the VITAL automated system.

Authors:  H Marchandin; B Compan; M Simeon De Buochberg; E Despaux; C Perez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Utilization review of the use of BACTEC PLUS high-volume blood culture bottles.

Authors:  R C Porter; P Lo; D E Low; A E Simor; A McGeer; S Scriver; T C Moore; C Goldman; M Skulnick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Bench-to-bedside review: the promise of rapid infection diagnosis during sepsis using polymerase chain reaction-based pathogen detection.

Authors:  Paul M Dark; Paul Dean; Geoffrey Warhurst
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Controlled comparison of the BacT/Alert and BACTEC 660/730 nonradiometric blood culture systems.

Authors:  M L Wilson; M P Weinstein; L G Reimer; S Mirrett; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Controlled evaluation of BACTEC PLUS 27 and Roche Septi-Chek anaerobic blood culture bottles.

Authors:  M L Wilson; L J Harrell; S Mirrett; M P Weinstein; C W Stratton; L B Reller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  The era of molecular and other non-culture-based methods in diagnosis of sepsis.

Authors:  Nicasio Mancini; Silvia Carletti; Nadia Ghidoli; Paola Cichero; Roberto Burioni; Massimo Clementi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 26.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.