Literature DB >> 3897271

Specimen volume versus yield in the BACTEC blood culture system.

J J Plorde, F C Tenover, L G Carlson.   

Abstract

During a 24-month period, 5,625 blood culture specimens were collected at the Seattle Veterans Administration Medical Center in 20-ml volumes and divided into separate 10-ml aliquots. The two aliquots were processed as duplicate sets (set 1, set 2) by the BACTEC system (Johnston Laboratories, Inc., Towson, Md.). Specimens (5 ml) from each set were inoculated into aerobic (6B) and anaerobic (7C/7D) vials. A total of 434 significantly positive blood cultures were found. In 342 of these positive cultures, yielding 379 isolates (112 members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, 104 staphylococci, 87 streptococci, 27 anaerobes, 20 yeasts, 14 pseudomonads, and 15 miscellaneous organisms), there was adequate specimen volume to fill all four vials. The utilization of set 1 would have resulted only in the failure to detect 65 of 379 (17.2%) significant isolates, 52 of 342 (15.2%) positive cultures, and 20 of 198 (10.1%) bacteremic episodes. There were no significant differences in the recovery of individual species in sets 1 and 2. Although the range of isolates recovered by the aerobic and anaerobic vials of each set differed, the percent yield of total isolates was similar, indicating total isolate yield was predominantly a function of specimen volume. The addition of set 2 most dramatically increased the recovery of Escherichia coli (30%), yeasts (33%), and anaerobes (42%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3897271      PMCID: PMC268378          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.22.2.292-295.1985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

1.  Effect of blood dilution on recovery of organisms from clinical blood cultures in medium containing sodium polyanethol sulfonate.

Authors:  J F Salventi; T A Davies; E L Randall; S Whitaker; J R Waters
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Effect of volume of blood cultured on detection of bacteremia.

Authors:  M M Hall; D M Ilstrup; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Effect of volume of blood cultured on detection of Streptococcus viridans bacteraemia.

Authors:  D C Shanson; F Thomas; D Wilson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  The importance of volume of blood cultured in the detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  D M Ilstrup; J A Washington
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  The importance of blood volume cultured on detection of bacteraemia.

Authors:  P Sandven; E A Høiby
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B       Date:  1981-06

6.  Clinical laboratory comparison of the 10-ml isolator blood culture system with BACTEC radiometric blood culture media.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J P Manzella; J H McConville
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Controlled evaluation of the volume of blood cultured in detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  J H Tenney; L B Reller; S Mirrett; W L Wang; M P Weinstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Laboratory experience with radiometric detection of bacteremia with three culture media.

Authors:  K Wicher; D Koscinski
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total
  36 in total

Review 1.  Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia.

Authors:  L G Reimer; M L Wilson; M P Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Blood cultures in newborns and children: optimising an everyday test.

Authors:  J P Buttery
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Effect of sample volume on yield of positive blood cultures from adult patients with haematological malignancy.

Authors:  D F Brown; R E Warren
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Optimized pathogen detection with 30- compared to 20-milliliter blood culture draws.

Authors:  Robin Patel; Emily A Vetter; W Scott Harmsen; Cathy D Schleck; Hind J Fadel; Franklin R Cockerill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Methods used in the United Kingdom for the culture of micro-organisms from blood.

Authors:  D F Brown; S F Perry
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Utility of paired BACTEC MYCO/F LYTIC blood culture vials for detection of bacteremia, mycobacteremia, and fungemia.

Authors:  L K Archibald; H Dobbie; P Kazembe; O Nwanyanwu; C McKnight; T Byrne; R M Addison; M Bell; L B Reller; W R Jarvis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Assessing how many blood cultures are needed for detecting bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Federico G Nicola
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Discrepant results from sampling different lumens of multilumen catheters: the case for sampling all lumens.

Authors:  J Cuellar-Rodriguez; D Connor; P Murray; J Gea-Banacloche
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Is the volume of blood cultured still a significant factor in the diagnosis of bloodstream infections?

Authors:  Emilio Bouza; Dolores Sousa; Marta Rodríguez-Créixems; Juan García Lechuz; Patricia Muñoz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Importance of blood volume cultured in the detection of bacteremia.

Authors:  M Arpi; M W Bentzon; J Jensen; W Frederiksen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.