Literature DB >> 25118248

Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research.

Tom Buller.   

Abstract

Although advance directives have become a familiar instrument within the context of treatment, there has been minimal support for their expansion into the context of research. In this paper I argue that the principle of precedent autonomy that grants a competent person the right to refuse life-sustaining treatment when later incompetent, also grants a competent person the right to consent to research that is greater than minimal risk. An examination of the principle of precedent autonomy reveals that a future-binding research decision is within the scope of a competent person's critical interests, if the decision is consistent with what the person believes gives her life intrinsic value. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy; Clinical Trials; Research Ethics; Research on Special Populations

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25118248     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  8 in total

1.  Including People with Dementia in Research: An Analysis of Australian Ethical and Legal Rules and Recommendations for Reform.

Authors:  Nola M Ries; Katie A Thompson; Michael Lowe
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Planning Ahead for Dementia Research Participation: Insights from a Survey of Older Australians and Implications for Ethics, Law and Practice.

Authors:  Nola Ries; Elise Mansfield; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Advance directives for future dementia can be modified by a brief video presentation on dementia care: An experimental study.

Authors:  Theresia Volhard; Frank Jessen; Luca Kleineidam; Steffen Wolfsgruber; Dirk Lanzerath; Michael Wagner; Wolfgang Maier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders.

Authors:  Tenzin Wangmo; Mirjam Lipps; Reto W Kressig; Marcello Ienca
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Advanced consent for participation in acute care randomised control trials: protocol for a scoping review.

Authors:  Naomi Niznick; Ronda Lun; Brian Dewar; Dar Dowlatshahi; Michel Shamy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Beyond competence: advance directives in dementia research.

Authors:  Karin Rolanda Jongsma; Suzanne van de Vathorst
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015 Jun-Sep

7.  Development and validation of a casemix classification to predict costs of specialist palliative care provision across inpatient hospice, hospital and community settings in the UK: a study protocol.

Authors:  Ping Guo; Mendwas Dzingina; Alice M Firth; Joanna M Davies; Abdel Douiri; Suzanne M O'Brien; Cathryn Pinto; Sophie Pask; Irene J Higginson; Kathy Eagar; Fliss E M Murtagh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Assessment of the Perceived Acceptability of an Early Enrollment Strategy Using Advance Consent in Health Care-Associated Pneumonia.

Authors:  Amy Corneli; Brian Perry; Deborah Collyar; John H Powers; John J Farley; Sara B Calvert; Jonas Santiago; Helen K Donnelly; Teresa Swezey; Carrie B Dombeck; Carisa De Anda; Vance G Fowler; Thomas L Holland
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-12-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.