Literature DB >> 31297689

Planning Ahead for Dementia Research Participation: Insights from a Survey of Older Australians and Implications for Ethics, Law and Practice.

Nola Ries1, Elise Mansfield2, Rob Sanson-Fisher2.   

Abstract

People with dementia have commonly been excluded from research. The adverse impacts of this exclusion are now being recognized and research literature, position statements, and ethics guidelines increasingly call for inclusion of people with dementia in research. However, few published studies investigate the views of potential participants on taking part in research should they experience dementia-related cognitive impairment. This cross-sectional survey examined the views of people aged sixty and older (n=174) attending hospital outpatient clinics about clinical research participation if they had dementia and impaired decision-making ability. Over 90 percent of respondents were agreeable to participating in a wide range of research activities, such as cognitive testing, physical measurements, imaging procedures, and blood draws. For drug studies, however, agreement dropped to 60 percent. Altruism was a strong motivator for research participation. In regard to who should be involved in decisions about their participation in research during periods of incapacity, respondents mostly preferred the person they appoint as their substitute decision-maker for healthcare matters (88%) or a doctor or health professional on the research team (78%). Over three-quarters (79%) expressed interest in making an advance research directive. The study findings are discussed in relation to law reforms in Australia that aim to strengthen respect and inclusion for people with impaired decision-making capacity, especially by providing frameworks for advance planning for research participation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advance research directive; Capacity to consent; Cognitive impairment; Dementia; Ethics; Law; Research

Year:  2019        PMID: 31297689     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-019-09929-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  56 in total

1.  Actively involving people with dementia in qualitative research.

Authors:  Jane McKeown; Amanda Clarke; Christine Ingleton; Julie Repper
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.036

2.  In situ monitoring of health in older adults: technologies and issues.

Authors:  Hyun Gu Kang; Diane F Mahoney; Helen Hoenig; Victor A Hirth; Paolo Bonato; Ihab Hajjar; Lewis A Lipsitz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  Advance consent, critical interests and dementia research.

Authors:  Tom Buller
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Has dementia research lost its sense of reality? A descriptive analysis of eligibility criteria of Dutch dementia research protocols.

Authors:  K R Jongsma; R L van Bruchem-Visser; S van de Vathorst; F U S Mattace Raso
Journal:  Neth J Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.422

Review 5.  Stability of end-of-life preferences: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Catherine L Auriemma; Christina A Nguyen; Rachel Bronheim; Saida Kent; Shrivatsa Nadiger; Dustin Pardo; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Multimedia Aided Consent for Alzheimer's Disease Research.

Authors:  Barton W Palmer; Alexandrea L Harmell; Laura B Dunn; Scott Y Kim; Luz L Pinto; Shahrokh Golshan; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.619

Review 7.  Shared decision-making in dementia: A review of patient and family carer involvement.

Authors:  Lyndsey M Miller; Carol J Whitlatch; Karen S Lyons
Journal:  Dementia (London)       Date:  2014-11-03

8.  Ethical issues in Alzheimer's disease research involving human subjects.

Authors:  Dena S Davis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 9.  Dementia registries around the globe and their applications: A systematic review.

Authors:  Karolina Krysinska; Perminder S Sachdev; John Breitner; Miia Kivipelto; Walter Kukull; Henry Brodaty
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 21.566

10.  Measuring informed consent capacity in an Alzheimer's disease clinical trial.

Authors:  Peter D Guarino; Julia E Vertrees; Sanjay Asthana; Mary Sano; Maria D Llorente; Muralidhar Pallaki; Susan Love; Gerard D Schellenberg; Maurice W Dysken
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2016-09-20
View more
  4 in total

1.  Ethical and Methodological Considerations for Evaluating Participant Views on Alzheimer's and Dementia Research.

Authors:  Clark Benson; Amanda Friz; Shannon Mullen; Laura Block; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Motivations for people with cognitive impairment to complete an advance research directive - a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Karin Jongsma; Julia Perry; Silke Schicktanz; Katrin Radenbach
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.630

3.  Advances and challenges in conducting ethical trials involving populations lacking capacity to consent: A decade in review.

Authors:  Victoria Shepherd
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  The full spectrum of ethical issues in dementia research: findings of a systematic qualitative review.

Authors:  Tim G Götzelmann; Hannes Kahrass; Daniel Strech
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.652

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.