Literature DB >> 28634767

Including People with Dementia in Research: An Analysis of Australian Ethical and Legal Rules and Recommendations for Reform.

Nola M Ries1, Katie A Thompson2, Michael Lowe3.   

Abstract

Research is crucial to advancing knowledge about dementia, yet the burden of the disease currently outpaces research activity. Research often excludes people with dementia and other cognitive impairments because researchers and ethics committees are concerned about issues related to capacity, consent, and substitute decision-making. In Australia, participation in research by people with cognitive impairment is governed by a national ethics statement and a patchwork of state and territorial laws that have widely varying rules. We contend that this legislative variation precludes a consistent approach to research governance and participation and hinders research that seeks to include people with impaired capacity. In this paper, we present key ethical principles, provide a comprehensive review of applicable legal rules in Australian states and territories, and highlight significant differences and ambiguities. Our analysis includes recommendations for reform to improve clarity and consistency in the law and reduce barriers that may exclude persons with dementia from participating in ethically approved research. Our recommendations seek to advance the national decision-making principles recommended by the Australian Law Reform Commission, which emphasize the rights of all adults to make their own decisions and for those with impaired capacity to have access to appropriate supports to help them make decisions that affect their lives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advance directives; Consent; Dementia; Law; Research ethics; Substitute decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28634767     DOI: 10.1007/s11673-017-9794-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  23 in total

1.  Dementia research: ethics and policy for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  R Dresser
Journal:  Georgia Law Rev       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Research in end-of-life settings: an ethical inquiry.

Authors:  Thomas W LeBlanc; Jane L Wheeler; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother       Date:  2010-09

3.  A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research.

Authors:  Dilip V Jeste; Barton W Palmer; Paul S Appelbaum; Shahrokh Golshan; Danielle Glorioso; Laura B Dunn; Kathleen Kim; Thomas Meeks; Helena C Kraemer
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2007-08

Review 4.  Dementia.

Authors:  Alistair Burns; Steve Iliffe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-02-05

5.  Comparison of two enhanced consent procedures for patients with mild Alzheimer disease or mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Dinesh Mittal; Barton W Palmer; Laura B Dunn; Reid Landes; Courtney Ghormley; Cornelia Beck; Shah Golshan; Dean Blevins; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.105

6.  Dementia research and advance consent: it is not about critical interests.

Authors:  Karin Rolanda Jongsma; Suzanne van de Vathorst
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 7.  The ethics of informed consent in Alzheimer disease research.

Authors:  Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Psychometric Properties of a Decisional Capacity Screening Tool for Individuals Contemplating Participation in Alzheimer's Disease Research.

Authors:  Jennifer Burgher Seaman; Lauren Terhorst; Amanda Gentry; Amanda Hunsaker; Lisa S Parker; Jennifer Hagerty Lingler
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.472

9.  Public's approach to surrogate consent for dementia research: cautious pragmatism.

Authors:  Raymond De Vries; Kerry A Ryan; Aimee Stanczyk; Paul S Appelbaum; Laura Damschroder; David S Knopman; Scott Y H Kim
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 4.105

10.  Research involving subjects with Alzheimer's disease in Italy: the possible role of family members.

Authors:  Corinna Porteri; Carlo Petrini
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  8 in total

1.  Planning Ahead for Dementia Research Participation: Insights from a Survey of Older Australians and Implications for Ethics, Law and Practice.

Authors:  Nola Ries; Elise Mansfield; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  A 450 Year Old Turkish Poem, Art as a Qualitative Investigation Tool, Buddhist Deathways, Karma and Eudaimonia in Death and Organ Donation: The Wonders of Truly Diverse Bioethical Inquiry!

Authors:  Michael A Ashby
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Factors influencing decisions about whether to participate in health research by people of diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds: a realist review.

Authors:  Eleanor Jayne Hoverd; George Hawker-Bond; Sophie Staniszewska; Jeremy Dale
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Ethical and Methodological Considerations for Evaluating Participant Views on Alzheimer's and Dementia Research.

Authors:  Clark Benson; Amanda Friz; Shannon Mullen; Laura Block; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  An under-represented and underserved population in trials: methodological, structural, and systemic barriers to the inclusion of adults lacking capacity to consent.

Authors:  Victoria Shepherd
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Advances and challenges in conducting ethical trials involving populations lacking capacity to consent: A decade in review.

Authors:  Victoria Shepherd
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.226

7.  The full spectrum of ethical issues in dementia research: findings of a systematic qualitative review.

Authors:  Tim G Götzelmann; Hannes Kahrass; Daniel Strech
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 8.  If Human Brain Organoids Are the Answer to Understanding Dementia, What Are the Questions?

Authors:  Lezanne Ooi; Mirella Dottori; Anthony L Cook; Martin Engel; Vini Gautam; Alexandra Grubman; Damián Hernández; Anna E King; Simon Maksour; Helena Targa Dias Anastacio; Rachelle Balez; Alice Pébay; Colin Pouton; Michael Valenzuela; Anthony White; Robert Williamson
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 7.519

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.