Defective autophagy in Alzheimer's disease (AD) promotes disease progression in diverse ways. Here, we demonstrate impaired autophagy flux in primary glial cells derived from CRND8 mice that overexpress mutant amyloid precursor protein (APP). Functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT) restored normal autophagy by reversing abnormal activation of mTOR signaling and deficits in lysosomal proteolysis, thereby facilitating elimination of autophagic substrates. These findings suggest SWNT as a novel neuroprotective approach to AD therapy.
Defective autophagy in Alzheimer's disease (AD) promotes disease progression in diverse ways. Here, we demonstrate impaired autophagy flux in primary glial cells derived from CRND8mice that overexpress mutant amyloid precursor protein (APP). Functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT) restored normal autophagy by reversing abnormal activation of mTOR signaling and deficits in lysosomal proteolysis, thereby facilitating elimination of autophagic substrates. These findings suggest SWNT as a novel neuroprotective approach to AD therapy.
Autophagy,
a lysosomal degradative
pathway for recycling obsolete cellular constituents and damaged organelles,
contributes to the pathogenesis of a range of human disease states.[1] Mounting evidence strongly implicates defective
autophagy in the development of several major neurodegenerative disorders,
especially Alzheimer’s disease (AD).[2,3] In
this study, we explored a strategy for reversing neural autophagy
impairments in a mouse model of AD using a novel nanoparticle strategy.
Carbon nanotubes have promising physical properties, including high
electrochemically accessible surface area,[4] excellent electronic current,[5,6] effective thermal conductivity,[7] and super mechanical strength,[8,9] which
recommend them for diverse applications in nanomedicine.[10−12] We used single walled carbon nanotubes (SWNT), a form of carbon
nanotubes with relatively high water-solubility and dispersibility,
conferring enhanced ability to translocate through cell membranes
with relatively low cytotoxicity.[13,14] Here, we took
advantage of recent reports that SWNT can strongly upregulate autophagy.[15] In most of these studies, SWNT were used at
high concentrations to promote death of cancer cells, although the
specific contribution of autophagy induction to the cytotoxicity is
unclear.[15−18] At lower concentrations, however, SWNT have cytoprotective effects[19,20] involving mechanisms of action that have not been carefully explored.
We therefore investigated the potential of low nontoxic concentrations
of SWNT to upregulate autophagy and to reverse defects in the autophagic
turnover of proteins within astroglial cells from the brains of AD
model mice.Although several forms of autophagy are known,[21] the major form, macroautophagy, hereafter referred
to as
autophagy, is induced mainly by a decrease in signaling by the protein
kinase mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) (Figure 1). Down-regulation of mTOR activates a series of macromolecular
complexes that coordinate a rearrangement of subcellular membranes
and creation of a cup-shaped phagophore that envelops cytoplasmic
constituents and closes to form an autophagosome (Figure 1). Autophagosomes ultimately fuse with lysosomes
to form acidic autolysosomes, wherein the degradation of proteins,
lipids, and other autophagy substrates occurs. Although autophagy
is constitutive in most cells, it is induced under conditions of nutrient
starvation or cell stress, such as protein aggregate accumulation,
and thereby provides energy and enables more adaptive new synthesis
from amino acids and other building blocks released from lysosomes
during substrate degradation.[21−23] The rate of substrate capture
and degradation (“autophagy flux”) can be monitored
by measuring changes in levels of specific proteins involved in substrate
sequestration, such as LC3 and p62, which are subsequently degraded
along with other captured substrates.[24]
Figure 1
Graphic
illustrates the autophagy pathway and its impairment in
CRND8 glial cells at two levels: lowered autophagy induction and lysosomal
proteolytic dysfunction, which are believed to contribute to AD pathogenesis,[6,27] Macroautophagy, hereafter referred to as autophagy, involves induction
steps dependent on the inhibition of mTOR, elongation of a membrane
structure (phagophore) around a substrate or a region of cytoplasm,
closure of this structure to form an autophagosome, fusion of the
autophagosome with lysosomes creating an autolysosome within which
autophagosomes are degraded by acidic hydrolases, yielding a lysosome.
To assess autophagy, we assayed the activation state of mTOR (induction),
formation, and translocation of LC3-II to autophagosomes (autophagosome
formation), autolysosomal degradation of autophagy substrates, including
two autophagy related proteins, LC3-II and p62. Lysosome function
is monitored by assay of cathepsin D (CatD) activation (proteolysis),
CatD maturation (enzyme activation and lysosomal pH), and lysosomal
acidification. The graphic depicts the sites of action of SWNT, internalized
by endocytosis, in restoring normal autophagy function by depressing
mTOR activity (asterisks) to stimulate autophagy induction and enhancing
lysosomal proteolysis by increasing cathepsin activation possibly
by restoring normal acidification of lysosomes (asterisks).
Graphic
illustrates the autophagy pathway and its impairment in
CRND8 glial cells at two levels: lowered autophagy induction and lysosomal
proteolytic dysfunction, which are believed to contribute to AD pathogenesis,[6,27] Macroautophagy, hereafter referred to as autophagy, involves induction
steps dependent on the inhibition of mTOR, elongation of a membrane
structure (phagophore) around a substrate or a region of cytoplasm,
closure of this structure to form an autophagosome, fusion of the
autophagosome with lysosomes creating an autolysosome within which
autophagosomes are degraded by acidic hydrolases, yielding a lysosome.
To assess autophagy, we assayed the activation state of mTOR (induction),
formation, and translocation of LC3-II to autophagosomes (autophagosome
formation), autolysosomal degradation of autophagy substrates, including
two autophagy related proteins, LC3-II and p62. Lysosome function
is monitored by assay of cathepsin D (CatD) activation (proteolysis),
CatD maturation (enzyme activation and lysosomal pH), and lysosomal
acidification. The graphic depicts the sites of action of SWNT, internalized
by endocytosis, in restoring normal autophagy function by depressing
mTOR activity (asterisks) to stimulate autophagy induction and enhancing
lysosomal proteolysis by increasing cathepsin activation possibly
by restoring normal acidification of lysosomes (asterisks).AD, the most prevalent human neurodegenerative
disease, is characterized
by intraneuronal aggregates of tau protein, extracellular β-amyloid
deposits associated with dystrophic and degenerating neurites, and
neuronal loss, ultimately leading to dementia.[25] In AD, autophagy-related vesicular compartments, especially
autolysosomes, accumulate within the grossly swollen dystrophic neurites,
reflecting a markedly defective clearance of autophagic substrates
by lysosomes.[4] The pathogenic significance
of this defect is underscored by the ability of mTOR inhibitors that
induce autophagy[26,27] or treatments that restore lysosomal
proteolysis to prevent diverse neuronal and cognitive deficits in
mouse models of AD.[28] In several lysosomal
storage disorders where neuronal autophagy is markedly impaired,[29] glial cells are also critical to clearing abnormally
accumulated or misfolded proteins[26] and
conferring neuroprotection.[30] Glial cells
may also protect neurons in AD by internalizing Aβ and other
potentially toxic proteins via endocytosis and clearing them within
lysosomes.[31−33]In a well-established transgenic mouse model
of AD-related amyloidosis
(CRND8), we investigated the therapeutic properties of a SWNT preparation[34] that was previously found to have cytoprotective
effects in a model of ethanol-induced neurodegeneration (Xue et al.
submitted). Notably, ethanol inhibits mTOR, which is an apparent neuroprotective
response because a further degree of autophagy induction with the
mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin, attenuates ethanol-induced neuronal death
while autophagy inhibition exacerbates it.[35] Under control of the Prp-promoter, CRND8mice overexpress a human
amyloid-β precursor protein (App) gene carrying
two mutations (i.e., “Swedish” and “Indiana”)
associated with familial early onset of AD.[36] Transgene overexpression leads to progressive β-amyloid deposition
and marked deficits of lysosomal proteolysis that impair turnover
of autophagy substrates and are associated with increased amyloidogenesis
and significant cognitive decline.[37,38] For the first
time, we establish in this report that autophagy is markedly impaired
in primary glia from CRND8mice and demonstrate that autophagy dysfunction
and autophagic substrate clearance are reversed by SWNT. Our results
further support the potential therapeutic value of enhancing autophagy
in AD and suggest a novel approach to restoring normal autophagy activity
when lysosomal function is impaired.
Primary CRND8 Glia as a System for Evaluating
Nanotube Effects
In our previous study,[34,39] a highly dispersed
carboxyl-functionalized SWNT system was sorted by density gradient
ultracentrifugation (DGU) in aqueous solution to obtain single-dispersed
SWNT. These SWNT fractions were found to have higher yield (50% output),
better reproducibility, and less cytotoxicity than previous preparations.[19,34] The SWNT fraction was further characterized by atomic force microscope
(AFM) (Supporting Information Figure S1A),
which revealed that the SWNTs were well dispersed and had an average
diameter of 1–2 nm (Supporting Information Figure S1B). This is consistent with our previous study by AFM height
measurements with HR-TEM results.[34]We investigated the competence of autophagy in purified primary glial
cells (Supporting Information Figure S2)
from CRND8mice and wild-type (WT) controls and the influences of
SWNT treatment. To mimic extracellular fluid (ECF) circulation in
the brain, culture medium was continuously removed and replaced by
fresh medium with/without SWNT at a constant rate using a mechanical
pump. By also removing APP metabolites secreted into the medium, this
procedure eliminated the possibility of superimposed effects of Aβ
reinternalized after its release from the cells. To evaluate autophagy
and the impact of SWNT exposure, we cultured WT and CRND8 glial cells
in medium without or with SWNT at 0.05 μg/mL, a concentration
determined to be 10-fold lower than that which induced toxicity assessed
by MTT assay (Supporting Information Figure
S3). This SWNT concentration was previously found to be neuroprotective
in our previous analyses of a neurodegeneration model (Xue et al.
submitted). As a positive control condition for autophagy responsiveness,
we used the specific mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin (5 nM), an established
autophagic inducing agent.[40] Culture medium
containing either SWNT, rapamycin, or deoxycholate sodium vehicle
alone was continuously flowed over glial cells for 10 h, following
which the glial cells were cultured with fresh medium without any
treatment.To characterize autophagy, we conducted immunoblot
analyses using
a panel of autophagy pathway markers that allowed us to interrogate
multiple steps in the autophagy pathway (Figure 1), including mTOR activation state (i.e., p70 S6 kinase phosphorylation
state), autophagosome formation (i.e., LC3-positive vesicles), and
lysosome function (i.e., LC3 and p62 turnover, cathepsin D (CatD)
maturation, lysosome acidification). Comparisons of untreated WT versus
CRND8 glial cells in Figure 2 established two
autophagy defects, an abnormal activation of mTOR signaling, reflecting
suppression of autophagy induction, and an impairment of lysosome
function in CRND8 glia (Figure 3).
Figure 2
Effects of
SWNT on autophagic induction. (A) Formation of LC3-positive
vesicular “puncta” (autophagosomes) in CRND8 glial cells
treated with SWNT and rapamycin detected by immunofluorescence using
LC3 antibody. (B) Western blot analysis showing LC3 levels with rapamycin
(5 nM, 24 h) as a positive control and actin as a loading control.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus CRND8 control group (CTRD8-Ctrl); #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 versus the
WT-Ctrl group; n = 3. (C) Western blot analysis of
LC3-II levels in the absence and presence of leupeptin, a cysteine
protease inhibitor, which blocks lysosomal degradation of LC3-II.
The difference in LC-II levels under these two conditions is a measure
of autophagosome formation.[42] Data are
presented as means ± SD *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus CRND8
control group (CTRD8-Ctrl); #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 versus the WT-Ctrl group; n = 3. (D)
Autophagic flux detection showing by Western blots with antiphospho-mTOR
(p-mTOR), antitotal-mTOR (t-mTOR), antiphospho-p70S6k (p-p70S6k),
antitotal-p70S6k (t-p70S6k),antiphospho-ULK1 (p-ULK1), and antitotal-ULK1
(t-ULK1) antibodies after treatment with SWNT 10 h following fresh
medium instead for 14 h and rapamycin for 24 h. The ratio of p-mTOR/t-mTOR
(E), p-p70S6k/t-p70S6k (F), p-ULK1/t-ULK1 (G) are quantified. Data
are presented as means ± SD *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus CRND8
control group (CTRD8-Ctrl); #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 versus the WT-Ctrl group; n = 3.
Figure 3
Effects of SWNTs on lysosomal function. (A)
CatD immunoblots showing
the mature form (matu-CatD, 32 kDa) and their pro-form (pro-CatD,
49 kDa) in both WT and CRND8 glial cells. The proportions of mature-CatD
and pro-CatD are measured. Data are presented as means ± SD *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus CRND8 control group (CRND8-Ctrl); #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 versus the
WT-Ctrl group; n = 3. (B) CatD activity assays are
assessed with LysoTracker and Bodipy-FL-pepstatin A, which binds to
active CatD. The scale bar represents 10 μm. (C) Quantitative
analysis of the intensity of Bodipy-FL-pepstatin A-positive compartments.
Data are presented as means ± SEM n = 40–50
each, randomly; ***p < 0.001 versus CRND8 control
group (CRND8-Ctrl); ###p < 0.001 versus
the WT-Ctrl group. (D) Immunofluorescence images showing double labeling
with Lamp2-positive lysosome (green) and CatD-postitive lysosomal
enzyme (red) in representative WT and CRND8 glial cells with high-magnification
images shown in inset. CatD/Lamp2-positive vesicles were counted with
ImageJ, presenting their relative size (E) and relative number (F)
of lysosomes. Data are presented as means ± SEM n = 40–50 each, randomly; ***p < 0.001
versus CRND8 control group (CRND8-Ctrl); ###p < 0.001 versus the WT-Ctrl group. (G) Western blot analysis of
p62 levels in the absence and presence of leupeptin. Data are presented
as means ± SD *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus CRND8 control
group (CTRD8-Ctrl); n = 3.
Effects of
SWNT on autophagic induction. (A) Formation of LC3-positive
vesicular “puncta” (autophagosomes) in CRND8 glial cells
treated with SWNT and rapamycin detected by immunofluorescence using
LC3 antibody. (B) Western blot analysis showing LC3 levels with rapamycin
(5 nM, 24 h) as a positive control and actin as a loading control.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus CRND8 control group (CTRD8-Ctrl); #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 versus the
WT-Ctrl group; n = 3. (C) Western blot analysis of
LC3-II levels in the absence and presence of leupeptin, a cysteine
protease inhibitor, which blocks lysosomal degradation of LC3-II.
The difference in LC-II levels under these two conditions is a measure
of autophagosome formation.[42] Data are
presented as means ± SD *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus CRND8
control group (CTRD8-Ctrl); #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 versus the WT-Ctrl group; n = 3. (D)
Autophagic flux detection showing by Western blots with antiphospho-mTOR
(p-mTOR), antitotal-mTOR (t-mTOR), antiphospho-p70S6k (p-p70S6k),
antitotal-p70S6k (t-p70S6k),antiphospho-ULK1 (p-ULK1), and antitotal-ULK1
(t-ULK1) antibodies after treatment with SWNT 10 h following fresh
medium instead for 14 h and rapamycin for 24 h. The ratio of p-mTOR/t-mTOR
(E), p-p70S6k/t-p70S6k (F), p-ULK1/t-ULK1 (G) are quantified. Data
are presented as means ± SD *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus CRND8
control group (CTRD8-Ctrl); #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 versus the WT-Ctrl group; n = 3.Effects of SWNTs on lysosomal function. (A)
CatD immunoblots showing
the mature form (matu-CatD, 32 kDa) and their pro-form (pro-CatD,
49 kDa) in both WT and CRND8 glial cells. The proportions of mature-CatD
and pro-CatD are measured. Data are presented as means ± SD *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus CRND8 control group (CRND8-Ctrl); #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 versus the
WT-Ctrl group; n = 3. (B) CatD activity assays are
assessed with LysoTracker and Bodipy-FL-pepstatin A, which binds to
active CatD. The scale bar represents 10 μm. (C) Quantitative
analysis of the intensity of Bodipy-FL-pepstatin A-positive compartments.
Data are presented as means ± SEM n = 40–50
each, randomly; ***p < 0.001 versus CRND8 control
group (CRND8-Ctrl); ###p < 0.001 versus
the WT-Ctrl group. (D) Immunofluorescence images showing double labeling
with Lamp2-positive lysosome (green) and CatD-postitive lysosomal
enzyme (red) in representative WT and CRND8 glial cells with high-magnification
images shown in inset. CatD/Lamp2-positive vesicles were counted with
ImageJ, presenting their relative size (E) and relative number (F)
of lysosomes. Data are presented as means ± SEM n = 40–50 each, randomly; ***p < 0.001
versus CRND8 control group (CRND8-Ctrl); ###p < 0.001 versus the WT-Ctrl group. (G) Western blot analysis of
p62 levels in the absence and presence of leupeptin. Data are presented
as means ± SD *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus CRND8 control
group (CTRD8-Ctrl); n = 3.
CRND8 Glia Exhibit Reduced mTOR-Dependent Autophagy Induction
and Autophagosome Formation, Which Are Reversed by SWNT
To
assess autophagosome formation, we monitored LC3, which shifts from
the cytosolic LC3-I form to LC3-II, its lipidated vesicle-associated
form, when LC3 is recruited to membranes to form new autophagosomes.[41] LC3-II is then degraded when autophagosomes
are cleared by lysosomes; therefore, steady-state levels of this protein
reflect its formation and degradation. These two processes can be
further differentiated experimentally by blocking LC3-II degradation
by inhibiting lysosomal cysteine proteases with the inhibitor leupeptin.[42] At baseline, LC3-II positive vesicles, marking
the presence of autophagosomes, were uncommon in both CRND8 and WT
cells, suggesting a low rate of formation (Figure 2A). Immunoblot analysis of LC3-II steady-state levels, however,
was increased in CRND8 glia (Figure 2B). Together,
these results suggested a low rate of autophagosome formation but
impaired LC3-II degradation in CRND8 cells. To further substantiate
a low rate of autophagosome formation in CRND8 cells, we evaluated
changes in LC3-II in the presence or absence of leupeptin. When LC3-II
degradation is blocked by leupeptin, its accumulation reflects only
the formation of autophagosomes. This analysis revealed 88% less LC3-II
build-up in CRND8 glia than in WT cells, establishing that autophagosome
formation is substantially reduced and that reduced lysosomal degradation
is the cause of the elevated LC3-II level (Figure 2C).To explain the lowered autophagosome formation,
we analyzed upstream mTOR signaling that controls the induction of
autophagosome production. In CRND8 glial cells, mTOR, a constitutive
suppressor of autophagy induction, exhibited increased activation,
as reflected in its higher phosphorylation state by Western blot analysis
(Figure 2D,E), paralleling an increased phosphorylation
state of one of its substrates, p70S6k (Figure 2D,F). In addition, the phosphorylation state of another mTOR substrate
UNC051 kinase 1 (ULK1) (at Ser757), which is directly linked to the
process of autophagosome formation was also increased (Figure 2D,G). These findings confirmed increased mTOR signaling,
which is associated with a suppression of autophagy induction and
autophagosome formation.SWNT treatment reversed abnormally
suppressed autophagy induction
in CRND8 glia but, notably, had minimal effect on WT glia. The ratios
of phospho-variant to total forms of mTOR and p70S6k in CRND8 glial
were both lowered by SWNT treatment back to WT levels (Figure 2D–F). In addition, the phosphorylation state
of p-ULK1 was also reduced in CRND8 glia to a level similar to that
in WT glia (Figure 2D,G). Interestingly, the
autophagy inducer rapamycin had similar effects to SWNT in CRND8 glia
(Figure 2D–G), but unlike SWNT, rapamycin
also induced autophagy in WT cells, as expected. Thus, SWNT had relatively
selective effect in reversing APP-driven pathological activation of
mTOR signaling in CRND8 glia without affecting the normal baseline
signaling in WT cells. These selective effects of SWNT in reducing
mTOR signaling and inducing autophagy in CRND8 glia are supported
by further immunocytochemical studies showing markedly increased numbers
of LC3-positive puncta in SWNT treated CRND8 cells (Figure 2A).
CRND8 Glia Exhibit Lysosomal Dysfunction,
Which Is Reversed
by SWNT
All forms of autophagy share the common cardinal
feature of autophagic substrate digestion within lysosomes.[3] In addition to having impaired autophagy induction,
CRND8 glia exhibited significant lysosomal dysfunction. CatD maturation
was markedly inhibited as evidenced by greatly lowered levels of the
mature (most active) 32 kDa form and an upward shift in the apparent
molecular size of full-length pro-forms of the enzyme (Figure 3A), suggesting a more immature glycosylation state.
Consistent with these alterations of active CatD in CRND8 glia, we
observed markedly decreased in situ lysosomal active CatD, reflected
by reduced fluorescence signal of the affinity ligand Bodipy-FL-pepstatin,
which binds only to the active state of CatD (Figure 3B,C).[43] Moreover, the sizes of
lysosomes were significantly enlarged as determined by morphometric
analysis after immunocytochemical detection of lysosome-associated
membrane protein 2 (Lamp2) and the lysosomal protease cathepsin D
(CatD) (Figure 3D,E). Enlargement was accompanied
by a decrease in lysosome number in CRND8 glia (59%, ###p < 0.001) (Figure 3F),
suggesting a possible impairment in lysosomal reformation.[44]SWNT treatment reversed these CatD maturation
abnormalities (Figure 3A) and the markedly
increased levels of CatD activity in CRND8 glia (51%, ***p < 0.001) assessed by Bodipy-FL-pepstatin A labeling, restoring
these levels to levels those comparable to vehicle-treated WT cells
(Figure 3B,C). Although total lysosomal protein,
reflected by levels of Lamp2, was not changed (Supporting Information Figure S4), the abnormally marked enlargement
of Lamp2- and CatD-positive lysosomes seen in CRND8 cells was also
corrected by SWNT (Figure 3D,E). The 31% reduction
(***p < 0.001) in average size of Lamp2/CatD-positive
lysosomes after SWNT treatment compared to the vehicle-treated CRND8
glia represented a full restoration to WT average lysosome size (Figure 3E). Additionally, ImageJ analysis revealed significantly
fewer lysosomes in CRND8 glia (59%, ###p < 0.001) compared to WT glia. SWNT treatment partially rescued
this abnormality (67% recovery, ***p < 0.001)
(Figure 3F). Finally, abnormally high levels
of p62 (SQSTM1/sequestome1), an established autophagy substrate, were
substantially lowered in CRND8 glial cells treated with SWNT (Figure 3G). Importantly, SWNT treatment of WT glia had negligible
effects on these parameters.Stimulating autophagy induction
has previously shown promise for
multiple neurodegenerative diseases by virtue of its potential to
preserve neuronal survival by lowering levels of toxic protein aggregates
and recycling nonessential constituents for energy and adaptive protein
synthesis under conditions of cellular stress.[1] The selective mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) inhibitor rapamycin, used
as a positive control in this study, was previously shown to attenuate
neuropathological and functional deficits in multiple ADmouse models.[45,46] Recent evidence shows that autophagy can be induced by nanomaterials,
such as fullerene C60,[47] quantum dots,[48] and nanocrystals.[49,50] Among these
nanomaterials, SWNT hold significant therapeutic promise as neuroprotective
agents that enhance neural growth, differentiation, and maturity.[51−53] However, few studies have addressed mechanisms underlying these
neuroprotective effects, including the potential of SWNT to induce
autophagy and enhance lysosomal clearance of autophagic substrates
in neurodegenerative diseases, which could shed light on possible
therapeutic applications.We show in this study for the first
time that primary glial cells
from the CRND8 transgenic mouse model of AD recapitulate the lysosomal
dysfunction demonstrated in CRND8 brain, which underlies deficits
in autophagic protein turnover and cognition.[37,54] We also provide the first evidence that impaired autophagic clearance
of substrates in this model is also accompanied by a significant activation
of mTOR signaling leading to the suppression of autophagy induction.
This combination of impairments would be expected to significantly
reduce autophagy substrate turnover and the capacity of neural cells
to respond to cellular stress and eliminate potentially toxic materials
internalized from the extracellular space or generated intracellularly,
such as Aβ peptide. The design of this cell culture system,
which incorporated a mechanism to continually remove from the medium
metabolites, such as Aβ, that are released from the cells, allows
us to conclude that these adverse effects on autophagy are due not
to endocytosis of released Aβ, which is potentially toxic to
lysosomes, but rather to other factors initiated by the overexpression
of mutant APP, which may include intracellular generation and accumulation
of Aβ and other APP metabolites or to altered signaling functions
of APP.We further observed remarkable effects of SWNT in reversing
both
the deficits in autophagy induction caused by abnormal mTOR signaling
and the impairments of lysosomal proteolysis leading to accumulation
of autophagic substrates and lysosome swelling. Improved lysosome
function may also be related to robust up-regulation of mTOR-dependent
autophagy induction, which is known to activate transcription factors,
including TFEB, that promotes transcription of most genes controlling
lysosome biogenesis and hydrolytic function and additional genes regulating
autophagy.[55,56] The ability of SWNT to enhance
autophagic flux represents one potential mechanism to account for
previously observed neuroprotective effects of SWNT in several pathological
settings. In studies by us (under review) and others, SWNT showed
neuroprotective effects at low nontoxic concentrations in several
neuropathological states in vitro[57] and
in vivo,[20] including experimental stroke,
in one case by triggering a neurotrophic pathway via the stimulation
of the Tropomyosin-receptor kinase (Trk) family and their downstream
protein molecules. These studies support our current evidence that
SWNT could have therapeutic actions in Alzheimer’s disease.Lysosomal dysfunction is a pathogenic factor in AD, PD, and other
neurodegenerative diseases and a potential therapeutic target.[23,58,59] To mimic possible in vivo conditions
for therapeutic delivery of SWNT, we provided a continuous flow of
SWNT over glial cells at very low concentrations that exerted no evident
cytotoxicity and are comparable to concentrations used by others without
mechanical pump.[15,60] Interestingly, concentrations
of SWNT that dramatically reversed autophagy deficits in CRND8 glia
negligibly altered autophagic/lysosome activation in WT cells. Although
it is tempting to speculate that SWNT may have selective effects on
the specific pathological processes leading to autophagy deficits
in the CRND8 model, it is alternatively possible that healthier WT
glial cells internalize and/or accumulate less SWNT or are more resistant
to an autophagy-triggering cellular stress induced by SWNT.While the mechanisms responsible for autophagy rescue by SWNT require
further investigation, our current findings provide proof-of-concept
evidence for a nanoparticle-based neuroprotective approach for AD
and other neurodegenerative diseases in which autophagy impairment
is a pathogenic factor. The future success of such biocompatible nanomaterials
will depend on optimization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties[61] and finding a balance between maximal therapeutic
efficacy and minimal adverse reactivity. To date, several studies
have demonstrated therapeutic effects of SWNT in brain ischemia by
local administration,[20,62] illustrating the potential for
clinical translation of nanomaterials.
Authors: Daniel J Klionsky; Hagai Abeliovich; Patrizia Agostinis; Devendra K Agrawal; Gjumrakch Aliev; David S Askew; Misuzu Baba; Eric H Baehrecke; Ben A Bahr; Andrea Ballabio; Bruce A Bamber; Diane C Bassham; Ettore Bergamini; Xiaoning Bi; Martine Biard-Piechaczyk; Janice S Blum; Dale E Bredesen; Jeffrey L Brodsky; John H Brumell; Ulf T Brunk; Wilfried Bursch; Nadine Camougrand; Eduardo Cebollero; Francesco Cecconi; Yingyu Chen; Lih-Shen Chin; Augustine Choi; Charleen T Chu; Jongkyeong Chung; Peter G H Clarke; Robert S B Clark; Steven G Clarke; Corinne Clavé; John L Cleveland; Patrice Codogno; María I Colombo; Ana Coto-Montes; James M Cregg; Ana Maria Cuervo; Jayanta Debnath; Francesca Demarchi; Patrick B Dennis; Phillip A Dennis; Vojo Deretic; Rodney J Devenish; Federica Di Sano; J Fred Dice; Marian Difiglia; Savithramma Dinesh-Kumar; Clark W Distelhorst; Mojgan Djavaheri-Mergny; Frank C Dorsey; Wulf Dröge; Michel Dron; William A Dunn; Michael Duszenko; N Tony Eissa; Zvulun Elazar; Audrey Esclatine; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; László Fésüs; Kim D Finley; José M Fuentes; Juan Fueyo; Kozo Fujisaki; Brigitte Galliot; Fen-Biao Gao; David A Gewirtz; Spencer B Gibson; Antje Gohla; Alfred L Goldberg; Ramon Gonzalez; Cristina González-Estévez; Sharon Gorski; Roberta A Gottlieb; Dieter Häussinger; You-Wen He; Kim Heidenreich; Joseph A Hill; Maria Høyer-Hansen; Xun Hu; Wei-Pang Huang; Akiko Iwasaki; Marja Jäättelä; William T Jackson; Xuejun Jiang; Shengkan Jin; Terje Johansen; Jae U Jung; Motoni Kadowaki; Chanhee Kang; Ameeta Kelekar; David H Kessel; Jan A K W Kiel; Hong Pyo Kim; Adi Kimchi; Timothy J Kinsella; Kirill Kiselyov; Katsuhiko Kitamoto; Erwin Knecht; Masaaki Komatsu; Eiki Kominami; Seiji Kondo; Attila L Kovács; Guido Kroemer; Chia-Yi Kuan; Rakesh Kumar; Mondira Kundu; Jacques Landry; Marianne Laporte; Weidong Le; Huan-Yao Lei; Michael J Lenardo; Beth Levine; Andrew Lieberman; Kah-Leong Lim; Fu-Cheng Lin; Willisa Liou; Leroy F Liu; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Carlos López-Otín; Bo Lu; Kay F Macleod; Walter Malorni; Wim Martinet; Ken Matsuoka; Josef Mautner; Alfred J Meijer; Alicia Meléndez; Paul Michels; Giovanni Miotto; Wilhelm P Mistiaen; Noboru Mizushima; Baharia Mograbi; Iryna Monastyrska; Michael N Moore; Paula I Moreira; Yuji Moriyasu; Tomasz Motyl; Christian Münz; Leon O Murphy; Naweed I Naqvi; Thomas P Neufeld; Ichizo Nishino; Ralph A Nixon; Takeshi Noda; Bernd Nürnberg; Michinaga Ogawa; Nancy L Oleinick; Laura J Olsen; Bulent Ozpolat; Shoshana Paglin; Glen E Palmer; Issidora Papassideri; Miles Parkes; David H Perlmutter; George Perry; Mauro Piacentini; Ronit Pinkas-Kramarski; Mark Prescott; Tassula Proikas-Cezanne; Nina Raben; Abdelhaq Rami; Fulvio Reggiori; Bärbel Rohrer; David C Rubinsztein; Kevin M Ryan; Junichi Sadoshima; Hiroshi Sakagami; Yasuyoshi Sakai; Marco Sandri; Chihiro Sasakawa; Miklós Sass; Claudio Schneider; Per O Seglen; Oleksandr Seleverstov; Jeffrey Settleman; John J Shacka; Irving M Shapiro; Andrei Sibirny; Elaine C M Silva-Zacarin; Hans-Uwe Simon; Cristiano Simone; Anne Simonsen; Mark A Smith; Katharina Spanel-Borowski; Vickram Srinivas; Meredith Steeves; Harald Stenmark; Per E Stromhaug; Carlos S Subauste; Seiichiro Sugimoto; David Sulzer; Toshihiko Suzuki; Michele S Swanson; Ira Tabas; Fumihiko Takeshita; Nicholas J Talbot; Zsolt Tallóczy; Keiji Tanaka; Kozo Tanaka; Isei Tanida; Graham S Taylor; J Paul Taylor; Alexei Terman; Gianluca Tettamanti; Craig B Thompson; Michael Thumm; Aviva M Tolkovsky; Sharon A Tooze; Ray Truant; Lesya V Tumanovska; Yasuo Uchiyama; Takashi Ueno; Néstor L Uzcátegui; Ida van der Klei; Eva C Vaquero; Tibor Vellai; Michael W Vogel; Hong-Gang Wang; Paul Webster; John W Wiley; Zhijun Xi; Gutian Xiao; Joachim Yahalom; Jin-Ming Yang; George Yap; Xiao-Ming Yin; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Li Yu; Zhenyu Yue; Michisuke Yuzaki; Olga Zabirnyk; Xiaoxiang Zheng; Xiongwei Zhu; Russell L Deter Journal: Autophagy Date: 2007-11-21 Impact factor: 16.016
Authors: Sandhya Vardharajula; Sk Z Ali; Pooja M Tiwari; Erdal Eroğlu; Komal Vig; Vida A Dennis; Shree R Singh Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2012-10-09
Authors: Abdelmagid M Elmatboly; Ahmed M Sherif; Dalia A Deeb; Amira Benmelouka; May N Bin-Jumah; Lotfi Aleya; Mohamed M Abdel-Daim Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Ju-Hyun Lee; Devin M Wolfe; Sandipkumar Darji; Mary Kate McBrayer; Daniel J Colacurcio; Asok Kumar; Philip Stavrides; Panaiyur S Mohan; Ralph A Nixon Journal: J Mol Biol Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 5.469