Ryan T Lacy1, Justin C Strickland1, Mark A Smith2. 1. Department of Psychology, Davidson College, USA. 2. Department of Psychology, Davidson College, USA; Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, USA. Electronic address: masmith@davidson.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the analysis of intravenous drug self-administration is limited to conditions in which subjects are tested in isolation. This limits the translational appeal of these studies because drug use in humans often occurs in the presence of others. NEW METHOD: We used custom-built operant conditioning chambers that allowed social dyads visual, olfactory, auditory, and limited tactile contact while concurrently self-administering cocaine. Male rats were trained to respond according to a fixed interval schedule of reinforcement (with a limited hold) in order to determine if patterns of cocaine (0.75mg/kg/infusion) self-administration became more similar over time in social pairs. Cocaine self-administration was tested across five days according to a 10-min fixed interval schedule (with a 5-min limited hold). Quarter-life values (time at which 25% of responses were emitted per interval) were analyzed using intraclass correlations. RESULTS: The total number of reinforcers obtained did not vary across the five days of testing; however, quarter-life values became progressively more similar between individuals within the social dyads. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Standard operant conditioning chambers are unable to assess responding in multiple animals due to their small size, the need to prevent subjects from responding on the lever of their partner, and the need to prevent infusion lines from entangling. By using custom-built social operant conditioning chambers, we assessed the effects of social contact on cocaine self-administration. CONCLUSION: Social operant conditioning chambers can be used as a preclinical method to examine social influences on drug self-administration under conditions that approximate human substance use.
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, the analysis of intravenous drug self-administration is limited to conditions in which subjects are tested in isolation. This limits the translational appeal of these studies because drug use in humans often occurs in the presence of others. NEW METHOD: We used custom-built operant conditioning chambers that allowed social dyads visual, olfactory, auditory, and limited tactile contact while concurrently self-administering cocaine. Male rats were trained to respond according to a fixed interval schedule of reinforcement (with a limited hold) in order to determine if patterns of cocaine (0.75mg/kg/infusion) self-administration became more similar over time in social pairs. Cocaine self-administration was tested across five days according to a 10-min fixed interval schedule (with a 5-min limited hold). Quarter-life values (time at which 25% of responses were emitted per interval) were analyzed using intraclass correlations. RESULTS: The total number of reinforcers obtained did not vary across the five days of testing; however, quarter-life values became progressively more similar between individuals within the social dyads. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Standard operant conditioning chambers are unable to assess responding in multiple animals due to their small size, the need to prevent subjects from responding on the lever of their partner, and the need to prevent infusion lines from entangling. By using custom-built social operant conditioning chambers, we assessed the effects of social contact on cocaine self-administration. CONCLUSION: Social operant conditioning chambers can be used as a preclinical method to examine social influences on drug self-administration under conditions that approximate human substance use.
Authors: Andrea M Robinson; Gaylen E Fronk; Huailin Zhang; Scott Tonidandel; Mark A Smith Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Mark A Smith; Karl T Schmidt; Jessica L Sharp; Tallia Pearson; Anna L Davis; Abigail N Gibson; Kenzie M Potter Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Andrea M Robinson; Ryan T Lacy; Justin C Strickland; Charlotte P Magee; Mark A Smith Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Ryan T Lacy; Justin C Strickland; Max A Feinstein; Andrea M Robinson; Mark A Smith Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2016-07-02 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Karl T Schmidt; Jessica L Sharp; Sarah B Ethridge; Tallia Pearson; Shannon Ballard; Kenzie M Potter; Mark A Smith Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 3.352