Andrea M Robinson1, Gaylen E Fronk1, Huailin Zhang1, Scott Tonidandel1, Mark A Smith2. 1. Department of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA. 2. Department of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA. Electronic address: masmith@davidson.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies conducted in male rats report that social contact can either facilitate or inhibit drug intake depending on the behavior of social partners. The purpose of the present study was to: (1) examine the effects of social contact on cocaine intake in female rats, (2) examine the behavioral mechanisms by which social contact influences cocaine intake, and (3) examine whether the estrous cycle moderates the effects of social contact on cocaine intake. METHODS: Female rats were assigned to either isolated or pair-housed conditions in which a social partner either had access to cocaine (cocaine partner) or did not have access to cocaine (abstinent partner). Pair-housed rats were tested in custom-built operant conditioning chambers that allowed both rats to be tested simultaneously in the same chamber. RESULTS: Rats housed with a cocaine partner self-administered more cocaine than isolated rats and rats housed with an abstinent partner. A behavioral economic analysis indicated that these differences were driven by a greater intensity of cocaine demand (i.e., greater intake at lower unit prices) in rats housed with a cocaine partner. Multivariate modeling revealed that the estrous cycle did not moderate the effects of social contact on cocaine intake. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that: (1) social contact influences cocaine self-administration in females in a manner similar to that reported in males, (2) these effects are due to differences in the effects of social contact on the intensity of cocaine demand, and (3) these effects are consistent across all phases of the estrous cycle.
BACKGROUND: Studies conducted in male rats report that social contact can either facilitate or inhibit drug intake depending on the behavior of social partners. The purpose of the present study was to: (1) examine the effects of social contact on cocaine intake in female rats, (2) examine the behavioral mechanisms by which social contact influences cocaine intake, and (3) examine whether the estrous cycle moderates the effects of social contact on cocaine intake. METHODS: Female rats were assigned to either isolated or pair-housed conditions in which a social partner either had access to cocaine (cocaine partner) or did not have access to cocaine (abstinent partner). Pair-housed rats were tested in custom-built operant conditioning chambers that allowed both rats to be tested simultaneously in the same chamber. RESULTS:Rats housed with a cocaine partner self-administered more cocaine than isolated rats and rats housed with an abstinent partner. A behavioral economic analysis indicated that these differences were driven by a greater intensity of cocaine demand (i.e., greater intake at lower unit prices) in rats housed with a cocaine partner. Multivariate modeling revealed that the estrous cycle did not moderate the effects of social contact on cocaine intake. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that: (1) social contact influences cocaine self-administration in females in a manner similar to that reported in males, (2) these effects are due to differences in the effects of social contact on the intensity of cocaine demand, and (3) these effects are consistent across all phases of the estrous cycle.
Authors: Vera Frajzyngier; Alan Neaigus; V Anna Gyarmathy; Maureen Miller; Samuel R Friedman Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2007-02-05 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Hanneke A Teunissen; Renske Spijkerman; Mitchell J Prinstein; Geoffrey L Cohen; Rutger C M E Engels; Ron H J Scholte Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-04-17 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Mark A Smith; Karl T Schmidt; Jessica L Sharp; Tallia Pearson; Anna L Davis; Abigail N Gibson; Kenzie M Potter Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Amy R Johnson; Kimberly C Thibeault; Alberto J Lopez; Emily G Peck; L Paul Sands; Christina M Sanders; Munir Gunes Kutlu; Erin S Calipari Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 7.853