Elizabeth L Inness1, Avril Mansfield2, Bimal Lakhani3, Mark Bayley4, William E McIlroy5. 1. E.L. Inness, BScPT, MSc, PhD candidate, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, 550 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2A2, and Department of Physical Therapy and Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. liz.inness@uhn.ca. 2. A. Mansfield, PhD, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network; Department of Physical Therapy and Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Toronto; the Heart & Stroke Foundation, Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery; and the Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. B. Lakhani, PhD, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network (currently affiliated with the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). 4. M. Bayley, MD, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto; Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto; and Heart & Stroke Foundation, Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery. 5. W.E. McIlroy, PhD, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network; Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Science, University of Toronto; Heart & Stroke Foundation, Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery; and the Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individuals with stroke are at increased risk for falls soon after hospital discharge. The ability to react to a balance perturbation, specifically with a rapid step, is critical to maintain balance and prevent falls. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of impaired reactive stepping responses in an ambulatory group of patients with stroke who were preparing for discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and the relationship to patient performance on commonly used clinical measures of balance, mobility, and lower limb impairment. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective analysis of patient admissions over a 3-year period. METHODS: Charts were reviewed for patients who, at time of discharge, had completed a perturbation-evoked reactive stepping assessment. RESULTS: Ninety-nine (71%) of 139 patients had impaired stepping reactions characterized by the need for assistance, an inability to step with either lower limb, or the need for multiple-step responses. There was a statistically significant difference in clinical scores between those with and without impaired stepping, but groups were characterized by considerable variation in clinical profiles. For example, Berg Balance Scale scores ranged from 25 to 55 versus 20 to 56 and gait speeds ranged from 0.17 to 1.43 versus 0.26 to 1.55 m/s for patients who demonstrated a failed step versus a successful step, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Not all patients who attended stroke rehabilitation received a reactive stepping assessment at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired reactive stepping is a prevalent problem for ambulatory patients with stroke preparing for discharge, possibly increasing their risk of falling when faced with the challenges of community ambulation. Specific tests that target the capacity to perform perturbation-evoked stepping reactions may be important to identify those at risk for falls and to direct appropriate intervention strategies.
BACKGROUND: Individuals with stroke are at increased risk for falls soon after hospital discharge. The ability to react to a balance perturbation, specifically with a rapid step, is critical to maintain balance and prevent falls. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence of impaired reactive stepping responses in an ambulatory group of patients with stroke who were preparing for discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and the relationship to patient performance on commonly used clinical measures of balance, mobility, and lower limb impairment. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective analysis of patient admissions over a 3-year period. METHODS: Charts were reviewed for patients who, at time of discharge, had completed a perturbation-evoked reactive stepping assessment. RESULTS: Ninety-nine (71%) of 139 patients had impaired stepping reactions characterized by the need for assistance, an inability to step with either lower limb, or the need for multiple-step responses. There was a statistically significant difference in clinical scores between those with and without impaired stepping, but groups were characterized by considerable variation in clinical profiles. For example, Berg Balance Scale scores ranged from 25 to 55 versus 20 to 56 and gait speeds ranged from 0.17 to 1.43 versus 0.26 to 1.55 m/s for patients who demonstrated a failed step versus a successful step, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Not all patients who attended stroke rehabilitation received a reactive stepping assessment at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired reactive stepping is a prevalent problem for ambulatory patients with stroke preparing for discharge, possibly increasing their risk of falling when faced with the challenges of community ambulation. Specific tests that target the capacity to perform perturbation-evoked stepping reactions may be important to identify those at risk for falls and to direct appropriate intervention strategies.
Authors: Avril Mansfield; Elizabeth L Inness; Jennifer S Wong; Julia E Fraser; William E McIlroy Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Jennifer S Wong; Hardika Jasani; Vivien Poon; Elizabeth L Inness; William E McIlroy; Avril Mansfield Journal: Gait Posture Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 2.840
Authors: C Gowland; P Stratford; M Ward; J Moreland; W Torresin; S Van Hullenaar; J Sanford; S Barreca; B Vanspall; N Plews Journal: Stroke Date: 1993-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Patricia Pak; Hina Jawed; Christina Tirone; Bethany Lamb; Cheryl Cott; Karen Brunton; Avril Mansfield; Elizabeth L Inness Journal: Physiother Can Date: 2015 Impact factor: 1.037