Literature DB >> 25931648

Incorporating research technology into the clinical assessment of balance and mobility: perspectives of physiotherapists and people with stroke.

Patricia Pak1, Hina Jawed1, Christina Tirone1, Bethany Lamb1, Cheryl Cott2, Karen Brunton3, Avril Mansfield4, Elizabeth L Inness5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the perspectives of people with stroke and their physiotherapists on the use of biomechanics technology to assess balance and mobility.
METHODS: This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with patients with stroke and a focus group with their physiotherapists. Coding of interview and focus-group data used a line-by-line inductive approach, with qualitative software to develop codes into themes.
RESULTS: The quantitative data from the assessment were seen as beneficial to providing patients with insight into balance and mobility problems. Physiotherapists found that the assessment confirmed clinical reasoning and aided in precise evaluation of progress but expressed mixed opinions as to whether treatment choice was influenced. Patients would have liked more communication regarding the purpose of the assessment. Patients also stated that trust in their physiotherapists helped them overcome anxieties and that confidence was gained through exposure to more challenging balance assessments. Physiotherapists advocated for the use of a harness system to safely incorporate reactive balance control assessment and training into practice.
CONCLUSION: Both patients and therapists saw value in the quantitative data provided by the assessment. Regardless of the technology used, patients value a strong physiotherapist-patient relationship. Ongoing collaboration between clinicians and researchers should guide the evolution of technology into clinically useful tools.

Entities:  

Keywords:  patient outcome assessment; postural balance; stroke; technology

Year:  2015        PMID: 25931648      PMCID: PMC4403336          DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2013-63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  24 in total

1.  Clinical correlates of between-limb synchronization of standing balance control and falls during inpatient stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Avril Mansfield; George Mochizuki; Elizabeth L Inness; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 2.  Pursuing common agendas: a collaborative model for knowledge translation between research and practice in clinical settings.

Authors:  Jennifer L Baumbusch; Sheryl Reimer Kirkham; Koushambhi Basu Khan; Heather McDonald; Pat Semeniuk; Elsie Tan; Joan M Anderson
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Validity and reliability of the Nintendo Wii Balance Board for assessment of standing balance.

Authors:  Ross A Clark; Adam L Bryant; Yonghao Pua; Paul McCrory; Kim Bennell; Michael Hunt
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Balance assessment practices and use of standardized balance measures among Ontario physical therapists.

Authors:  Kathryn M Sibley; Sharon E Straus; Elizabeth L Inness; Nancy M Salbach; Susan B Jaglal
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-08-25

Review 5.  The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits.

Authors:  M Mancini; F B Horak
Journal:  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.874

Review 6.  Rehabilitation care and outcomes from the patient's perspective.

Authors:  A M Kramer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care.

Authors:  P D Cleary; B J McNeil
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 8.  Falls in individuals with stroke.

Authors:  Vivian Weerdesteyn; Mark de Niet; Hanneke J R van Duijnhoven; Alexander C H Geurts
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

9.  Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: a comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization.

Authors:  Kara K Patterson; William H Gage; Dina Brooks; Sandra E Black; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-11-22       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 10.  Enriching the doctor-patient relationship by inviting the patient's perspective.

Authors:  T L Delbanco
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinician's Commentary on Pak et al.(1).

Authors:  Bimal Lakhani
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Relationships between fear of falling, balance confidence, and control of balance, gait, and reactive stepping in individuals with sub-acute stroke.

Authors:  Alison Schinkel-Ivy; Elizabeth L Inness; Avril Mansfield
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Integrating Technology Into Clinical Practice for the Assessment of Balance and Mobility: Perspectives of Exercise Professionals Practicing in Retirement and Long-term Care.

Authors:  Karen Van Ooteghem; Avril Mansfield; Elizabeth L Inness; Jaimie Killingbeck; Kathryn M Sibley
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2020-01-16

4.  Embodiment, tailoring, and trust are important for co-construction of meaning in physiotherapy after stroke: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Marianne Sivertsen; Hanne De Jaegher; Ellen Christin Arntzen; Karl Bjørnar Alstadhaug; Britt Normann
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2022-03-20

5.  Perspectives on the prospective development of stroke-specific lower extremity wearable monitoring technology: a qualitative focus group study with physical therapists and individuals with stroke.

Authors:  Dennis R Louie; Marie-Louise Bird; Carlo Menon; Janice J Eng
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 4.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.