Literature DB >> 26289480

Modulation of reactive response to slip-like perturbations: effect of explicit cues on paretic versus non-paretic side stepping and fall-risk.

Prakruti Patel1, Tanvi Bhatt2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effect of explicit cuing on reactive stepping with the paretic limb during slip-like perturbations in stroke survivors and to identify differences in postural stability and fall-risk while stepping with either limb. Eleven chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors received slip-like stance perturbations in no-cue (implicit, no instructions) and cued (explicit, instructions to step with paretic limb) conditions. Frequency of stepping with the paretic limb was recorded. Differences between non-paretic and paretic steps for falls, number of compensatory steps, relative center-of-mass position (X COM/BOS), and velocity (Ẋ(COM/BOS)), and vertical limb support (hip descent-Z hip) were analyzed. Stepping with the paretic limb increased from 6% in no-cue condition to 42% in cued condition with no significant difference in number of falls and steps regardless of stepping limb. At liftoff of the compensatory step, stability was greater (anterior X COM/BOS) with paretic than non-paretic limb stepping whereas, at touchdown (TD) of the step, stability with paretic limb reduced (posterior X COM/BOS and Ẋ(COM/BOS)) due to a smaller compensatory step taken with the paretic versus non-paretic limb. There was no significant difference in peak Z hip regardless of stepping limb; however, the timing of peak Z hip differed (occuring prior to TD during non-paretic stepping and post-TD during paretic stepping). Thus, fall onset was earlier with non-paretic versus paretic stepping. The results support that explicit cueing can facilitate initiation of reactive step from the paretic limb as compared with the no-cue condition. Stepping with the paretic limb in the cued condition however altered time of fall onset. Regardless of the stepping side, individuals demonstrated a fall risk suggesting the need for interventions focusing on reactive step training with both the limbs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic stability; Hemiparesis; Paretic limb stepping; Slips

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26289480     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4367-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  50 in total

1.  Diminished stepping responses lead to a fall following a novel slip induced during a sit-to-stand.

Authors:  Michael J Pavol; Eileen F Runtz; Yi-Chung Pai
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Are age-related impairments in change-in-support balance reactions dependent on the method of balance perturbation?

Authors:  Avril Mansfield; Brian E Maki
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Is impaired control of reactive stepping related to falls during inpatient stroke rehabilitation?

Authors:  Avril Mansfield; Elizabeth L Inness; Jennifer S Wong; Julia E Fraser; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 4.  Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Paulette M van Vliet; Gabriele Wulf
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2006 Jul 15-30       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 5.  The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the "change-in-support" strategy.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1997-05

6.  Dynamic stability and compensatory stepping responses during anterior gait-slip perturbations in people with chronic hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  Tejal Kajrolkar; Feng Yang; Y-C Pai; Tanvi Bhatt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Independent influence of gait speed and step length on stability and fall risk.

Authors:  D D Espy; F Yang; T Bhatt; Y-C Pai
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Mechanisms of limb collapse following a slip among young and older adults.

Authors:  Yi-Chung Pai; Feng Yang; Jason D Wening; Michael J Pavol
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Effects of visual center of pressure feedback on postural control in young and elderly healthy adults and in stroke patients.

Authors:  Mylène C Dault; Mirjam de Haart; Alexander C H Geurts; Ilse M P Arts; Bart Nienhuis
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; H O Raaschou; J Vive-Larsen; M Støier; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  4 in total

1.  Maintaining sagittal plane balance compromises frontal plane balance during reactive stepping in people post-stroke.

Authors:  Tom J W Buurke; Chang Liu; Sungwoo Park; Rob den Otter; James M Finley
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Posterior fall-recovery training applied to individuals with chronic stroke: A single-group intervention study.

Authors:  Jamie Pigman; Darcy S Reisman; Ryan T Pohlig; John J Jeka; Tamara R Wright; Benjamin C Conner; Drew A Petersen; Michael S Christensen; Jeremy R Crenshaw
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Examining Neural Plasticity for Slip-Perturbation Training: An fMRI Study.

Authors:  Prakruti J Patel; Tanvi Bhatt; Sophie R DelDonno; Scott A Langenecker; Shamali Dusane
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Body configuration at first stepping-foot contact predicts backward balance recovery capacity in people with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Digna de Kam; Jolanda M B Roelofs; Alexander C H Geurts; Vivian Weerdesteyn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.