STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. OBJECTIVES: To compare differences in glenohumeral joint angular motion and linear translations between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals during shoulder motion performed in 3 planes of humerothoracic elevation. BACKGROUND: Numerous clinical theories have linked abnormal glenohumeral kinematics, including decreased glenohumeral external rotation and increased superior translation, to individuals with shoulder pain and impingement diagnoses. However, relatively few studies have investigated glenohumeral joint angular motion and linear translations in this population. METHODS: Transcortical bone pins were inserted into the scapula and humerus of 12 asymptomatic and 10 symptomatic participants for direct bone-fixed tracking using electromagnetic sensors. Glenohumeral joint angular positions and linear translations were calculated during active shoulder flexion, abduction, and scapular plane abduction. RESULTS: Differences between groups in angular positions were limited to glenohumeral elevation, coinciding with a reduction in scapulothoracic upward rotation. Symptomatic participants demonstrated 1.4 mm more anterior glenohumeral translation between 90° and 120° of shoulder flexion and an average of 1 mm more inferior glenohumeral translation throughout shoulder abduction. CONCLUSION: Differences in glenohumeral kinematics exist between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. The clinical implications of these differences are not yet understood, and more research is needed to understand the relationship between abnormal kinematics, shoulder pain, and pathoanatomy.
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. OBJECTIVES: To compare differences in glenohumeral joint angular motion and linear translations between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals during shoulder motion performed in 3 planes of humerothoracic elevation. BACKGROUND: Numerous clinical theories have linked abnormal glenohumeral kinematics, including decreased glenohumeral external rotation and increased superior translation, to individuals with shoulder pain and impingement diagnoses. However, relatively few studies have investigated glenohumeral joint angular motion and linear translations in this population. METHODS: Transcortical bone pins were inserted into the scapula and humerus of 12 asymptomatic and 10 symptomatic participants for direct bone-fixed tracking using electromagnetic sensors. Glenohumeral joint angular positions and linear translations were calculated during active shoulder flexion, abduction, and scapular plane abduction. RESULTS: Differences between groups in angular positions were limited to glenohumeral elevation, coinciding with a reduction in scapulothoracic upward rotation. Symptomatic participants demonstrated 1.4 mm more anterior glenohumeral translation between 90° and 120° of shoulder flexion and an average of 1 mm more inferior glenohumeral translation throughout shoulder abduction. CONCLUSION: Differences in glenohumeral kinematics exist between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. The clinical implications of these differences are not yet understood, and more research is needed to understand the relationship between abnormal kinematics, shoulder pain, and pathoanatomy.
Authors: Garry E Gold; George P Pappas; Silvia S Blemker; Sean T Whalen; Gordon Campbell; Timothy A McAdams; Christopher F Beaulieu Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-08-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: W Ben Kibler; Paula M Ludewig; Phil W McClure; Lori A Michener; Klaus Bak; Aaron D Sciascia Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: J Erik Giphart; John P Brunkhorst; Nils H Horn; Kevin B Shelburne; Michael R Torry; Peter J Millett Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Paula M Ludewig; Vandana Phadke; Jonathan P Braman; Daniel R Hassett; Cort J Cieminski; Robert F LaPrade Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Paula M Ludewig; Danilo H Kamonseki; Justin L Staker; Rebekah L Lawrence; Paula R Camargo; Jonathan P Braman Journal: Int J Sports Phys Ther Date: 2017-11
Authors: Hema J Sulkar; Tyler W Knighton; Linda Amoafo; Klevis Aliaj; Christopher W Kolz; Yue Zhang; Tucker Hermans; Heath B Henninger Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2022-05-01 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Rebekah L Lawrence; Jonathan P Braman; Robert F Laprade; Paula M Ludewig Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Joseph D Mozingo; Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz; Meegan G Van Straaten; Naveen S Murthy; Beth A Schueler; David R Holmes; Cynthia H McCollough; Kristin D Zhao Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 2.368