Literature DB >> 31481296

Comparison of glenohumeral joint kinematics between manual wheelchair tasks and implications on the subacromial space: A biplane fluoroscopy study.

Joseph D Mozingo1, Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz2, Meegan G Van Straaten2, Naveen S Murthy3, Beth A Schueler3, David R Holmes4, Cynthia H McCollough3, Kristin D Zhao2.   

Abstract

Scapula and humerus motion associated with common manual wheelchair tasks is hypothesized to reduce the subacromial space. However, previous work relied on either marker-based motion capture for kinematic measures, which is prone to skin-motion artifact; or ultrasound imaging for arthrokinematic measures, which are 2D and acquired in statically-held positions. The aim of this study was to use a fluoroscopy-based approach to accurately quantify glenohumeral kinematics during manual wheelchair use, and compare tasks for a subset of parameters theorized to be associated with mechanical impingement. Biplane images of the dominant shoulder were acquired during scapular plane elevation, propulsion, sideways lean, and weight-relief raise in ten manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. A computed tomography scan of the shoulder was obtained, and model-based tracking was used to quantify six-degree-of-freedom glenohumeral kinematics. Axial rotation and superior/inferior and anterior/posterior humeral head positions were characterized for full activity cycles and compared between tasks. The change in the subacromial space was also determined for the period of each task defined by maximal change in the aforementioned parameters. Propulsion, sideways lean, and weight-relief raise, but not scapular plane elevation, were marked by mean internal rotation (8.1°, 10.8°, 14.7°, -49.2° respectively). On average, the humeral head was most superiorly positioned during the weight-relief raise (1.6 ± 0.9 mm), but not significantly different from the sideways lean (0.8 ± 1.1 mm) (p = 0.191), and much of the task was characterized by inferior translation. Scaption was the only task without a defined period of superior translation on average. Pairwise comparisons revealed no significant differences between tasks for anterior/posterior position (task means range: 0.1-1.7 mm), but each task exhibited defined periods of anterior translation. There was not a consistent trend across tasks between internal rotation, superior translation, and anterior translation with reductions in the subacromial space. Further research is warranted to determine the likelihood of mechanical impingement during these tasks based on the measured task kinematics and reductions in the subacromial space.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fluoroscopy; Kinematics; Model-based tracking; Shoulder; Subacromial space; Wheelchair

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31481296      PMCID: PMC7036020          DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  43 in total

1.  The accuracy and repeatability of an automatic 2D-3D fluoroscopic image-model registration technique for determining shoulder joint kinematics.

Authors:  Zhonglin Zhu; Daniel F Massimini; Guangzhi Wang; Jon J P Warner; Guoan Li
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  The effects of arm elevation on the 3-dimensional acromiohumeral distance: a biplane fluoroscopy study with normative data.

Authors:  J Erik Giphart; Olivier A J van der Meijden; Peter J Millett
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Comparison of glenohumeral motion using different rotation sequences.

Authors:  Vandana Phadke; Jonathan P Braman; Robert F LaPrade; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  In vivo estimation of the glenohumeral joint centre by functional methods: accuracy and repeatability assessment.

Authors:  Mathieu Lempereur; Fabien Leboeuf; Sylvain Brochard; Jean Rousset; Valérie Burdin; Olivier Rémy-Néris
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  An evidence-based review of current perceptions with regard to the subacromial space in shoulder impingement syndromes: Is it important and what influences it?

Authors:  Tanya Anne Mackenzie; Lee Herrington; Ian Horlsey; Ann Cools
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Scapula kinematics and associated impingement risk in manual wheelchair users during propulsion and a weight relief lift.

Authors:  Melissa M B Morrow; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Development of the Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI).

Authors:  K A Curtis; K E Roach; E B Applegate; T Amar; C S Benbow; T D Genecco; J Gualano
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1995-05

8.  MRI vs CT-based 2D-3D auto-registration accuracy for quantifying shoulder motion using biplane video-radiography.

Authors:  Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz; Rebekah L Lawrence; Arin M Ellingson; Casey P Johnson; Kristin D Zhao; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Validation of imaging-based quantification of glenohumeral joint kinematics using an unmodified clinical biplane fluoroscopy system.

Authors:  Joseph D Mozingo; Mohsen Akbari Shandiz; Felicia M Marquez; Beth A Schueler; David R Holmes; Cynthia H McCollough; Kristin D Zhao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Scapulothoracic and Glenohumeral Kinematics During Daily Tasks in Users of Manual Wheelchairs.

Authors:  Kristin D Zhao; Meegan G Van Straaten; Beth A Cloud; Melissa M Morrow; Kai-Nan An; Paula M Ludewig
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-11-20
View more
  3 in total

1.  Shoulder mechanical impingement risk associated with manual wheelchair tasks in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Joseph D Mozingo; Mohsen Akbari-Shandiz; Naveen S Murthy; Meegan G Van Straaten; Beth A Schueler; David R Holmes; Cynthia H McCollough; Kristin D Zhao
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Effect of Fatiguing Wheelchair Propulsion and Weight Relief Lifts on Subacromial Space in Wheelchair Users.

Authors:  Ursina Arnet; Michael L Boninger; Ann Cools; Fransiska M Bossuyt
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-04-27

3.  Trends and advancements in shoulder biomechanics research.

Authors:  Melissa M Morrow; Andrea G Cutti; Meghan E Vidt
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 2.368

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.