Rebekah L Lawrence1, Jonathan P Braman2, Daniel F Keefe3, Paula M Ludewig4. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Bone and Joint Center, Henry Ford Health System, 6135 Woodward Ave, Detroit, MI 48202 (USA). 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota. 3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota. 4. PhD, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Scapulothoracic upward rotation (UR) is an important shoulder complex motion allowing for a larger functional work space and improved glenohumeral muscle function. However, the kinematic mechanisms producing scapulothoracic UR remain unclear, limiting the understanding of normal and abnormal shoulder movements. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the coupling relationships through which sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joint motions contribute to scapulothoracic UR. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional observational study. METHODS: Sixty participants were enrolled in this study; 30 had current shoulder pain, and 30 had no history of shoulder symptoms. Shoulder complex kinematics were quantified using single-plane fluoroscopy and 2D/3D shape matching and were described as finite helical displacements for 30-degree phases of humerothoracic elevation (30 degrees-60 degrees, 60 degrees-90 degrees, and 90 degrees-120 degrees). A coupling function was derived to estimate scapulothoracic UR from its component motions of acromioclavicular UR, sternoclavicular posterior rotation, and sternoclavicular elevation as a function of acromioclavicular internal rotation. The proportional contributions of each of the component motions were also calculated and compared between phases of humerothoracic elevation and groups. RESULTS: Scapulothoracic UR displacement could be effectively predicted using the derived coupling function. During the 30- to 60-degree humerothoracic elevation phase, acromioclavicular UR accounted for 84.2% of scapulothoracic UR, whereas sternoclavicular posterior rotation and elevation each accounted for < 10%. During later phases, acromioclavicular UR and sternoclavicular posterior rotation each accounted for 32% to 42%, whereas sternoclavicular elevation accounted for < 11%. LIMITATIONS: Error due to the tracking of sternoclavicular posterior rotation may have resulted in an underprediction of its proportional contribution and an overprediction of the proportional contribution of acromioclavicular UR. CONCLUSIONS: Acromioclavicular UR and sternoclavicular posterior rotation are the predominant component motions of scapulothoracic UR. More research is needed to investigate how these coupling relationships are affected by muscle function and influenced by scapular dyskinesis.
BACKGROUND: Scapulothoracic upward rotation (UR) is an important shoulder complex motion allowing for a larger functional work space and improved glenohumeral muscle function. However, the kinematic mechanisms producing scapulothoracic UR remain unclear, limiting the understanding of normal and abnormal shoulder movements. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the coupling relationships through which sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joint motions contribute to scapulothoracic UR. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional observational study. METHODS: Sixty participants were enrolled in this study; 30 had current shoulder pain, and 30 had no history of shoulder symptoms. Shoulder complex kinematics were quantified using single-plane fluoroscopy and 2D/3D shape matching and were described as finite helical displacements for 30-degree phases of humerothoracic elevation (30 degrees-60 degrees, 60 degrees-90 degrees, and 90 degrees-120 degrees). A coupling function was derived to estimate scapulothoracic UR from its component motions of acromioclavicular UR, sternoclavicular posterior rotation, and sternoclavicular elevation as a function of acromioclavicular internal rotation. The proportional contributions of each of the component motions were also calculated and compared between phases of humerothoracic elevation and groups. RESULTS: Scapulothoracic UR displacement could be effectively predicted using the derived coupling function. During the 30- to 60-degree humerothoracic elevation phase, acromioclavicular UR accounted for 84.2% of scapulothoracic UR, whereas sternoclavicular posterior rotation and elevation each accounted for < 10%. During later phases, acromioclavicular UR and sternoclavicular posterior rotation each accounted for 32% to 42%, whereas sternoclavicular elevation accounted for < 11%. LIMITATIONS: Error due to the tracking of sternoclavicular posterior rotation may have resulted in an underprediction of its proportional contribution and an overprediction of the proportional contribution of acromioclavicular UR. CONCLUSIONS: Acromioclavicular UR and sternoclavicular posterior rotation are the predominant component motions of scapulothoracic UR. More research is needed to investigate how these coupling relationships are affected by muscle function and influenced by scapular dyskinesis.
Authors: Jonathan P Braman; Brian M Thomas; Robert F Laprade; Vandana Phadke; Paula M Ludewig Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2010-06-05 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Hillary A Plummer; Jonathan C Sum; Federico Pozzi; Rini Varghese; Lori A Michener Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Yannick J Ehmann; Daniel P Berthold; Sven Reuter; Knut Beitzel; Robin Köhler; Fabian Stöcker; Lukas N Muench; Jonas Pogorzelski; Marco-Christopher Rupp; Sepp Braun; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Buchmann Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2021-11-06 Impact factor: 4.114