OBJECTIVE: Assessment of virtual reality (VR) distraction for alleviating pain and anxiety during flexible cystoscopy. Cystoscopy is a common ambulatory procedure performed in Urology and can be associated with moderate pain and anxiety. Sophisticated distraction techniques are not used with cystoscopy and VR has not been studied for this procedure. We designed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial assessing the efficacy of VR for alleviating pain and anxiety during flexible cystoscopy. METHODS:Adult men referred for cystoscopy were randomized into a control or VR group. Subjects were given preprocedure and postprocedure questionnaires addressing anxiety, pain, and time spent thinking about pain. Vitals signs and galvanic skin monitors were used as objective measures. The control group underwent routine cystoscopy and the VR group underwent cystoscopy with VR. Physicians answered a postprocedure questionnaire assessing the difficulty of the exam. All questionnaires used a visual analog score for assessment. RESULTS:23 patients enrolled in the control group and 22 in the VR group. Mean scores and Student's t-test were employed to analyze the data. No data endpoints showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded no benefit to VR distraction mitigating pain in male patients during cystoscopy. Reprint &
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Assessment of virtual reality (VR) distraction for alleviating pain and anxiety during flexible cystoscopy. Cystoscopy is a common ambulatory procedure performed in Urology and can be associated with moderate pain and anxiety. Sophisticated distraction techniques are not used with cystoscopy and VR has not been studied for this procedure. We designed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial assessing the efficacy of VR for alleviating pain and anxiety during flexible cystoscopy. METHODS: Adult men referred for cystoscopy were randomized into a control or VR group. Subjects were given preprocedure and postprocedure questionnaires addressing anxiety, pain, and time spent thinking about pain. Vitals signs and galvanic skin monitors were used as objective measures. The control group underwent routine cystoscopy and the VR group underwent cystoscopy with VR. Physicians answered a postprocedure questionnaire assessing the difficulty of the exam. All questionnaires used a visual analog score for assessment. RESULTS: 23 patients enrolled in the control group and 22 in the VR group. Mean scores and Student's t-test were employed to analyze the data. No data endpoints showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded no benefit to VR distraction mitigating pain in male patients during cystoscopy. Reprint &
Authors: Kevin Koo; Lisa Zubkoff; Brenda E Sirovich; Philip P Goodney; Douglas J Robertson; John D Seigne; Florian R Schroeck Journal: Urology Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Stephan Seklehner; Paul Friedrich Engelhardt; Mesut Remzi; Harun Fajkovic; Zana Saratlija-Novakovic; Matthias Skopek; Irene Resch; Mario Duvnjak; Stephan Hruby; Clemens Wehrberger; Davor Librenjak; Wilhelm Hübner; Eckart Breinl; Claus Riedl Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Hyun Ju Kim; Jong Wook Kim; Hong Seok Park; Du Geon Moon; Jeong Gu Lee; Mi Mi Oh Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Driss Laghlam; Cecile Naudin; Lucas Coroyer; Vincent Aidan; Julien Malvy; Ghilas Rahoual; Philippe Estagnasié; Pierre Squara Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: Henry Xiang; Jiabin Shen; Krista K Wheeler; Jeremy Patterson; Kimberly Lever; Megan Armstrong; Junxin Shi; Rajan K Thakkar; Jonathan I Groner; Dana Noffsinger; Sheila A Giles; Renata B Fabia Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-06-01