Hyun Ju Kim1, Jong Wook Kim1, Hong Seok Park1, Du Geon Moon1, Jeong Gu Lee1, Mi Mi Oh2,3. 1. Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Urology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. mamah@hanmail.net. 3. Department of Urology, Korea University Guro Hospital, #148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul, 08308, Republic of Korea. mamah@hanmail.net.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study evaluated the effects of using a heating pad during cystoscopy on anxiety, pain, and distress in female patients. METHODS:Seventy-four female patients who underwent rigid cystoscopy between January 2017 and August 2017 were randomized to either the experimental group using a heating pad (n = 37) or the control group using a pad without heat (n = 37). In the experimental group, a heating pad was applied to the patient's sacrum during cystoscopy. All patients completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-S (STAI-S, 20-80) before and after the procedure and assessed their degree of pain and distress after the procedure using a visual analog scale (0-10). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate were also measured before and after the procedure. RESULTS:Demographic characteristics, mean age, procedure duration, and pre- and post-procedural systolic and diastolic blood pressures and pulse rate were statistically similar between the experimental and control groups. The mean STAI-S score of the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (33.1 ± 10.1 vs 48.2 ± 11.1, p < 0.001). The experimental group had significantly lower pain and distress scores (visual analog scale, 3.8 ± 1.6 and 3.8 ± 1.8 respectively,) than the control group (6.4 ± 1.9 and 6.3 ± 2.1 respectively, both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using a heating pad during cystoscopy significantly reduced female patients' anxiety, pain, and distress. We found this to be a safe, simple, and effective tool to use during cystoscopy.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study evaluated the effects of using a heating pad during cystoscopy on anxiety, pain, and distress in female patients. METHODS: Seventy-four female patients who underwent rigid cystoscopy between January 2017 and August 2017 were randomized to either the experimental group using a heating pad (n = 37) or the control group using a pad without heat (n = 37). In the experimental group, a heating pad was applied to the patient's sacrum during cystoscopy. All patients completed the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-S (STAI-S, 20-80) before and after the procedure and assessed their degree of pain and distress after the procedure using a visual analog scale (0-10). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate were also measured before and after the procedure. RESULTS: Demographic characteristics, mean age, procedure duration, and pre- and post-procedural systolic and diastolic blood pressures and pulse rate were statistically similar between the experimental and control groups. The mean STAI-S score of the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group (33.1 ± 10.1 vs 48.2 ± 11.1, p < 0.001). The experimental group had significantly lower pain and distress scores (visual analog scale, 3.8 ± 1.6 and 3.8 ± 1.8 respectively,) than the control group (6.4 ± 1.9 and 6.3 ± 2.1 respectively, both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using a heating pad during cystoscopy significantly reduced female patients' anxiety, pain, and distress. We found this to be a safe, simple, and effective tool to use during cystoscopy.
Authors: Marko Babjuk; Andreas Böhle; Maximilian Burger; Otakar Capoun; Daniel Cohen; Eva M Compérat; Virginia Hernández; Eero Kaasinen; Joan Palou; Morgan Rouprêt; Bas W G van Rhijn; Shahrokh F Shariat; Viktor Soukup; Richard J Sylvester; Richard Zigeuner Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Marc R Walker; George J S Kallingal; John E Musser; Raymond Folen; Melba C Stetz; Joseph Y Clark Journal: Mil Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Hugo Hall; Yasmin Dhuga; Caroline Yan Zheng; Gemma Clunie; Elizabeth Joyce; Helen McNair; Alison H McGregor Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-03-16 Impact factor: 2.692