Literature DB >> 25097298

ADAPTIVE MATCHING IN RANDOMIZED TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES.

Mark J van der Laan1, Laura B Balzer1, Maya L Petersen1.   

Abstract

In many randomized and observational studies the allocation of treatment among a sample of n independent and identically distributed units is a function of the covariates of all sampled units. As a result, the treatment labels among the units are possibly dependent, complicating estimation and posing challenges for statistical inference. For example, cluster randomized trials frequently sample communities from some target population, construct matched pairs of communities from those included in the sample based on some metric of similarity in baseline community characteristics, and then randomly allocate a treatment and a control intervention within each matched pair. In this case, the observed data can neither be represented as the realization of n independent random variables, nor, contrary to current practice, as the realization of n/2 independent random variables (treating the matched pair as the independent sampling unit). In this paper we study estimation of the average causal effect of a treatment under experimental designs in which treatment allocation potentially depends on the pre-intervention covariates of all units included in the sample. We define efficient targeted minimum loss based estimators for this general design, present a theorem that establishes the desired asymptotic normality of these estimators and allows for asymptotically valid statistical inference, and discuss implementation of these estimators. We further investigate the relative asymptotic efficiency of this design compared with a design in which unit-specific treatment assignment depends only on the units' covariates. Our findings have practical implications for the optimal design and analysis of pair matched cluster randomized trials, as well as for observational studies in which treatment decisions may depend on characteristics of the entire sample.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cluster randomized trials; G-computation formula; adaptive randomization; asymptotic linearity of an estimator; causal effect; confounding; dependent treatment allocation; efficient influence curve; empirical process; influence curve; loss function; matching; semiparametric statistical model; targeted maximum likelihood estimation; targeted minimum loss based estimation (TMLE)

Year:  2012        PMID: 25097298      PMCID: PMC4119765     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Res        ISSN: 0256-422X


  15 in total

1.  Aspects of statistical design for the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT).

Authors:  M H Gail; D P Byar; T F Pechacek; D K Corle
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1992-02

2.  Mounting a community-randomized trial: sample size, matching, selection, and randomization issues in PRISM.

Authors:  Lyndsey Watson; Rhonda Small; Stephanie Brown; Wendy Dawson; Judith Lumley
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-06

3.  Assessing the gain in efficiency due to matching in a community intervention study.

Authors:  L S Freedman; S B Green; D P Byar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Developments in cluster randomized trials and Statistics in Medicine.

Authors:  M J Campbell; A Donner; N Klar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Super learner.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Eric C Polley; Alan E Hubbard
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-16

6.  Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT): summary of design and intervention. COMMIT Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-11-20       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched-pair design.

Authors:  Kosuke Imai
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of the parameter of a marginal structural model.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 0.968

9.  The efficiency of the matched-pairs design of the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT).

Authors:  L S Freedman; M H Gail; S B Green; D K Corle
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1997-04

10.  A cluster randomized trial of routine HIV-1 viral load monitoring in Zambia: study design, implementation, and baseline cohort characteristics.

Authors:  John R Koethe; Andrew O Westfall; Dora K Luhanga; Gina M Clark; Jason D Goldman; Priscilla L Mulenga; Ronald A Cantrell; Benjamin H Chi; Isaac Zulu; Michael S Saag; Jeffrey S A Stringer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Adaptive pre-specification in randomized trials with and without pair-matching.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Causal Inference for a Population of Causally Connected Units.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2014-03

3.  Targeted estimation and inference for the sample average treatment effect in trials with and without pair-matching.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Maya L Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Adaptive pair-matching in randomized trials with unbiased and efficient effect estimation.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Maya L Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A Generally Efficient Targeted Minimum Loss Based Estimator based on the Highly Adaptive Lasso.

Authors:  Mark van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 0.968

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.