Literature DB >> 18618425

Variance identification and efficiency analysis in randomized experiments under the matched-pair design.

Kosuke Imai1.   

Abstract

In his 1923 landmark article, Neyman introduced randomization-based inference to estimate average treatment effects from experiments under the completely randomized design. Under this framework, Neyman considered the statistical estimation of the sample average treatment effect and derived the variance of the standard estimator using the treatment assignment mechanism as the sole basis of inference. In this paper, I extend Neyman's analysis to randomized experiments under the matched-pair design where experimental units are paired based on their pre-treatment characteristics and the randomization of treatment is subsequently conducted within each matched pair. I study the variance identification for the standard estimator of average treatment effects and analyze the relative efficiency of the matched-pair design over the completely randomized design. I also show how to empirically evaluate the relative efficiency of the two designs using experimental data obtained under the matched-pair design. My randomization-based analysis differs from previous studies in that it avoids modeling and other assumptions as much as possible. Finally, the analytical results are illustrated with numerical and empirical examples. Copyright 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18618425     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

1.  "All Generalizations Are Dangerous, Even This One."-Alexandre Dumas.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Improving massive experiments with threshold blocking.

Authors:  Michael J Higgins; Fredrik Sävje; Jasjeet S Sekhon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Targeted estimation and inference for the sample average treatment effect in trials with and without pair-matching.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Maya L Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Adaptive pair-matching in randomized trials with unbiased and efficient effect estimation.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Maya L Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Using a network-based approach and targeted maximum likelihood estimation to evaluate the effect of adding pre-exposure prophylaxis to an ongoing test-and-treat trial.

Authors:  Laura Balzer; Patrick Staples; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Victor DeGruttola
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  ADAPTIVE MATCHING IN RANDOMIZED TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Laura B Balzer; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  J Stat Res       Date:  2012-12-01

7.  Effectiveness of the EMPOWER-PAR Intervention in Improving Clinical Outcomes of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Anis Safura Ramli; Sharmini Selvarajah; Maryam Hannah Daud; Jamaiyah Haniff; Suraya Abdul-Razak; Tg Mohd Ikhwan Tg-Abu-Bakar-Sidik; Mohamad Adam Bujang; Boon How Chew; Thuhairah Rahman; Seng Fah Tong; Asrul Akmal Shafie; Verna K M Lee; Kien Keat Ng; Farnaza Ariffin; Hasidah Abdul-Hamid; Md Yasin Mazapuspavina; Nafiza Mat-Nasir; Chun W Chan; Abdul Rahman Yong-Rafidah; Mastura Ismail; Sharmila Lakshmanan; Wilson H H Low
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Association of Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography and Clinical Outcomes After Open Cardiac Valve or Proximal Aortic Surgery.

Authors:  Emily J MacKay; Bo Zhang; John G Augoustides; Peter W Groeneveld; Nimesh D Desai
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-02-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.