Literature DB >> 26180755

Causal Inference for a Population of Causally Connected Units.

Mark J van der Laan.   

Abstract

Suppose that we observe a population of causally connected units. On each unit at each time-point on a grid we observe a set of other units the unit is potentially connected with, and a unit-specific longitudinal data structure consisting of baseline and time-dependent covariates, a time-dependent treatment, and a final outcome of interest. The target quantity of interest is defined as the mean outcome for this group of units if the exposures of the units would be probabilistically assigned according to a known specified mechanism, where the latter is called a stochastic intervention. Causal effects of interest are defined as contrasts of the mean of the unit-specific outcomes under different stochastic interventions one wishes to evaluate. This covers a large range of estimation problems from independent units, independent clusters of units, and a single cluster of units in which each unit has a limited number of connections to other units. The allowed dependence includes treatment allocation in response to data on multiple units and so called causal interference as special cases. We present a few motivating classes of examples, propose a structural causal model, define the desired causal quantities, address the identification of these quantities from the observed data, and define maximum likelihood based estimators based on cross-validation. In particular, we present maximum likelihood based super-learning for this network data. Nonetheless, such smoothed/regularized maximum likelihood estimators are not targeted and will thereby be overly bias w.r.t. the target parameter, and, as a consequence, generally not result in asymptotically normally distributed estimators of the statistical target parameter. To formally develop estimation theory, we focus on the simpler case in which the longitudinal data structure is a point-treatment data structure. We formulate a novel targeted maximum likelihood estimator of this estimand and show that the double robustness of the efficient influence curve implies that the bias of the targeted minimum loss-based estimation (TMLE) will be a second-order term involving squared differences of two nuisance parameters. In particular, the TMLE will be consistent if either one of these nuisance parameters is consistently estimated. Due to the causal dependencies between units, the data set may correspond with the realization of a single experiment, so that establishing a (e.g. normal) limit distribution for the targeted maximum likelihood estimators, and corresponding statistical inference, is a challenging topic. We prove two formal theorems establishing the asymptotic normality using advances in weak-convergence theory. We conclude with a discussion and refer to an accompanying technical report for extensions to general longitudinal data structures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  causal inference; efficient influence curve; networks; stochastic intervention; targeted maximum likelihood estimation

Year:  2014        PMID: 26180755      PMCID: PMC4500386          DOI: 10.1515/jci-2013-0002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Causal Inference        ISSN: 2193-3685


  19 in total

1.  Developments in cluster randomized trials and Statistics in Medicine.

Authors:  M J Campbell; A Donner; N Klar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A mapping between interactions and interference: implications for vaccine trials.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Jan P Vandenbroucke; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Super learner.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Eric C Polley; Alan E Hubbard
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-16

5.  Sensitivity analysis for causal inference under unmeasured confounding and measurement error problems.

Authors:  Iván Díaz; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of the parameter of a marginal structural model.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 0.968

8.  A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods.

Authors:  J Robins
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

9.  Population intervention causal effects based on stochastic interventions.

Authors:  Iván Díaz Muñoz; Mark van der Laan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Causal inference in infectious diseases.

Authors:  M E Halloran; C J Struchiner
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.822

View more
  6 in total

1.  Causal inference when counterfactuals depend on the proportion of all subjects exposed.

Authors:  Caleb H Miles; Maya Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Dependent Happenings: A Recent Methodological Review.

Authors:  M Elizabeth Halloran; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2016-07-28

3.  Adaptive pair-matching in randomized trials with unbiased and efficient effect estimation.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Maya L Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of causal effects with interference: A simulation study.

Authors:  Paul N Zivich; Michael G Hudgens; Maurice A Brookhart; James Moody; David J Weber; Allison E Aiello
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Semi-Parametric Estimation and Inference for the Mean Outcome of the Single Time-Point Intervention in a Causally Connected Population.

Authors:  Oleg Sofrygin; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2016-11-29

6.  Spillover effects in epidemiology: parameters, study designs and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Jade Benjamin-Chung; Benjamin F Arnold; David Berger; Stephen P Luby; Edward Miguel; John M Colford; Alan E Hubbard
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.