Selin Merdan1, Paul R Womble2, David C Miller2, Christine Barnett1, Zaojun Ye2, Susan M Linsell3, James E Montie2, Brian T Denton4. 1. Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 2. Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI. 3. Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI. 4. Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: btdenton@umich.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of published guidelines compared with that of current practice for radiographic staging of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative clinical registry, we identified 1509 men diagnosed with prostate cancer from March 2012 through June 2013. Clinical data included age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score (GS), clinical trial stage, number of biopsy cores, and bone scan (BS) results. We then fit a multivariate logistic regression model to examine the association between clinical variables and the occurrence of bone metastases. Because some patients did not undergo BS, we used established methods to correct for verification bias and estimate the diagnostic accuracy of published guidelines. RESULTS: Among 416 men who received a BS, 48 (11.5%) had evidence of bone metastases. Patients with bone metastases were older, with higher PSA levels and GS (all P <.05). In multivariate analyses, PSA (P <.001) and GS (P = .004) were the only independent predictors of positive BS. Guidelines from the American Urological Association and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network demonstrated similar performance in detecting bone metastases in our population, with fewer negative study results than those of the European Association of Urology guideline. Applying the American Urological Association recommendations (ie, image when PSA level >20 ng/mL or GS ≥ 8) to current clinical practice, we estimate that <1% of positive study results would be missed, whereas the number of negative study results would be reduced by 38%. CONCLUSION: Based on current practice patterns, more uniform application of existing guidelines would ensure that BS is performed for almost all men with bone metastases, while avoiding many negative imaging studies.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of published guidelines compared with that of current practice for radiographic staging of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative clinical registry, we identified 1509 men diagnosed with prostate cancer from March 2012 through June 2013. Clinical data included age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score (GS), clinical trial stage, number of biopsy cores, and bone scan (BS) results. We then fit a multivariate logistic regression model to examine the association between clinical variables and the occurrence of bone metastases. Because some patients did not undergo BS, we used established methods to correct for verification bias and estimate the diagnostic accuracy of published guidelines. RESULTS: Among 416 men who received a BS, 48 (11.5%) had evidence of bone metastases. Patients with bone metastases were older, with higher PSA levels and GS (all P <.05). In multivariate analyses, PSA (P <.001) and GS (P = .004) were the only independent predictors of positive BS. Guidelines from the American Urological Association and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network demonstrated similar performance in detecting bone metastases in our population, with fewer negative study results than those of the European Association of Urology guideline. Applying the American Urological Association recommendations (ie, image when PSA level >20 ng/mL or GS ≥ 8) to current clinical practice, we estimate that <1% of positive study results would be missed, whereas the number of negative study results would be reduced by 38%. CONCLUSION: Based on current practice patterns, more uniform application of existing guidelines would ensure that BS is performed for almost all men with bone metastases, while avoiding many negative imaging studies.
Authors: Ian Thompson; James Brantley Thrasher; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Michael S Cookson; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine M Tangen Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Mohammed A Al-Ghazo; Ibrahim F Ghalayini; Rami S Al-Azab; Ibrahim Bani-Hani; Alaa Barham; Yazan Haddad Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Alberto Briganti; Niccolò Passoni; Matteo Ferrari; Umberto Capitanio; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Gallina; Luigi Filippo Da Pozzo; Maria Picchio; Valerio Di Girolamo; Andrea Salonia; Liugi Gianolli; Cristina Messa; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-12-18 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Chad W M Ritenour; John T Abbott; Michael Goodman; Naomi Alazraki; Fray F Marshall; Muta M Issa Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2009-10-02
Authors: Christine L Barnett; Matthew S Davenport; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Lakshmi Priya Kunju; Brian T Denton; Morand Piert Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-07-26 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Akintunde T Orunmuyi; Sikiru A Adebayo; Olayinka S Ilesanmi; Augustine O Takure; E Oluwabunmi Olapade-Olaopa Journal: Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-01-28
Authors: Michael Inadomi; Karandeep Singh; Ji Qi; Rodney Dunn; Susan Linsell; Brian Denton; Patrick Hurley; Eduardo Kleer; James Montie; Khurshid R Ghani Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Felix Preisser; Elio Mazzone; Sebastiano Nazzani; Michele Marchioni; Marco Bandini; Zhe Tian; Fred Saad; Denis Soulières; Shahrokh F Shariat; Francesco Montorsi; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Derya Tilki; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Cristian Arriaga-Canon; Inti Alberto De La Rosa-Velázquez; Rodrigo González-Barrios; Rogelio Montiel-Manríquez; Diego Oliva-Rico; Francisco Jiménez-Trejo; Carlo Cortés-González; Luis A Herrera Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-04-17