Literature DB >> 21176275

Do all patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer need staging radionuclide bone scan? A retrospective study.

Mohammed A Al-Ghazo1, Ibrahim F Ghalayini, Rami S Al-Azab, Ibrahim Bani-Hani, Alaa Barham, Yazan Haddad.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Define a group of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, whose risk of bone metastasis is low enough to omit a bone scan staging study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2009, the medical records of patients who were newly diagnosed with prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed. The data collected included: age, digital rectal examination, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, clinical T stage, and bone isotope scan. Patients were divided into two groups according to the results of bone isotope scan; positive group and negative group. A univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression was used to analyze the results.
RESULTS: Of the 106 patients, 98 had a complete data collection and were entered into the study. The median age of the patients was 70.5 years and patients with a positive bone scan was 74 years, significantly higher than for patients with negative scans (69 years) (p=0.02). Bone metastasis was detected in 39 cases (39.7%). In all patients with clinical T1-2 stage, a Gleason score of <8 and PSA≤20 ng/mL, the bone isotope scans were negative. In univariate analysis, PSA (>20 ng/mL) and Gleason score (>7) were independently predictive of positive bone scan, while clinical stage was not.
CONCLUSION: Staging bone scans can be omitted in patients with a PSA level of ≤20 ng/mL, and Gleason score<8. Our results suggest that by considering the Gleason score and PSA, a larger proportion of patients with prostate cancer could avoid a staging bone scan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21176275     DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382010000600006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  6 in total

1.  A Bone Scan Is Valuable for Primary Staging of Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer in a Low-Resource Setting (Nigeria).

Authors:  Akintunde T Orunmuyi; Sikiru A Adebayo; Olayinka S Ilesanmi; Augustine O Takure; E Oluwabunmi Olapade-Olaopa
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-01-28

Review 2.  Systematic review of interventions that improve provider compliance to imaging guidelines for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samuel M Pettit; David Mikhail; Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.052

3.  Toward better use of bone scans among men with early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Selin Merdan; Paul R Womble; David C Miller; Christine Barnett; Zaojun Ye; Susan M Linsell; James E Montie; Brian T Denton
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Application of bone scans for prostate cancer staging: Which guideline shows better result?

Authors:  Ari Chong; Insang Hwang; Jung-Min Ha; Seong Hyeon Yu; Eu Chang Hwang; Ho Song Yu; Sun Ouck Kim; Seung-Il Jung; Taek Won Kang; Dong Deuk Kwon; Kwangsung Park
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Is it suitable to eliminate bone scan for prostate cancer patients with PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL?

Authors:  Seung Hwan Lee; Mun Su Chung; Kyung Kgi Park; Chan Dong Yom; Dae Hoon Lee; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Prostate-specific Antigen as a Risk Factor for Skeletal Metastasis in Native Ethnic African Men with Prostate Cancer: A Case-control Study.

Authors:  Ayman M Qureshi; Khalid Makhdomi; William Stones
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.