Literature DB >> 16601380

A study on staging bone scans in newly diagnosed prostate cancer.

R Ayyathurai1, R Mahapatra, R Rajasundaram, V Srinivasan, N P Archard, H Toussi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the role of bone scan as a staging investigation in newly diagnosed untreated prostate cancers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bone scan results in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were reviewed and correlated with clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason scores from the biopsy specimen.
RESULTS: In all, 124 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria with an age range of 51-94 (mean 72.3) years. Pre-biopsy PSA ranged from 2.2 to 5,864 with a median of 21.1 ng/ml. Clinical stage was T0-T1c 14.5%, T2a 41.9%, T2b 17.7%, T3 16.9%, and T4 9%. A Gleason score of 7 was found in 31%. Four patients' samples were not suitable for Gleason scoring. Twenty patients (16.1%) had a positive bone scan with a mean age of 79.4 years (median 83). Two patients with PSA<20 ng/ml were positive. Of the 44 scans performed in the patients with PSA<or=20 ng/ml, clinical stage<T4 and Gleason sum<or=7 (with the major Gleason<4), none was positive. The above criteria give a 100% negative predictive value for avoiding bone scans as a staging investigation.
CONCLUSIONS: Staging bone scan can be safely omitted in patients with a clinical stage of <T4, PSA level of <or=20 ng/ml and a Gleason score of <or=7 (with major Gleason pattern<4) unless the symptoms are suggestive of metastasis. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16601380     DOI: 10.1159/000091620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  4 in total

1.  Predicting bone scan positivity after biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in both hormone-naive men and patients receiving androgen-deprivation therapy: results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  D M Moreira; M R Cooperberg; L E Howard; W J Aronson; C J Kane; M K Terris; C L Amling; M Kuchibhatla; S J Freedland
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Changing the referral criteria for bone scan in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  C McArthur; G McLaughlin; R N Meddings
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Validating the screening criteria for bone metastases in treatment-naïve unfavorable intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer - the prevalence and location of bone- and lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Erik Rud; Daniyal Noor; Kristina Flor Galtung; Fredrik Ottosson; Maciej Jacewicz; Eduard Baco; Peter Mæhre Lauritzen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 7.034

4.  Toward better use of bone scans among men with early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Selin Merdan; Paul R Womble; David C Miller; Christine Barnett; Zaojun Ye; Susan M Linsell; James E Montie; Brian T Denton
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.649

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.