| Literature DB >> 25093733 |
Kouhei Kamiya1, Masaaki Hori2, Masakazu Miyajima3, Madoka Nakajima3, Yuriko Suzuki4, Koji Kamagata2, Michimasa Suzuki2, Hajime Arai3, Kuni Ohtomo5, Shigeki Aoki2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Previous studies suggest that compression and stretching of the corticospinal tract (CST) potentially cause treatable gait disturbance in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Measurement of axon diameter with diffusion MRI has recently been used to investigate microstructural alterations in neurological diseases. In this study, we investigated alterations in the axon diameter and intra-axonal fraction of the CST in iNPH by q-space imaging (QSI) analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25093733 PMCID: PMC4122461 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103842
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Examples of the acquired diffusion weighted images.
Results of the measurement of CST axon diameter and intra-axonal volume fraction.
| controls | iNPH patients | |||
| right | left | right | left | |
| Internal capsule level | ||||
| axon diameter (µm) | 2.07±0.35 | 2.00±0.31 | 2.00±0.53 | 2.16±0.28 |
| intra-axonal volume fraction | 0.47±0.05 | 0.46±0.06 | 0.49±0.09 | 0.53±0.08 |
| Paraventricular level | ||||
| axon diameter (µm) | 2.09±0.12 | 2.04±0.14 | 2.10±0.16 | 2.11±0.15 |
| intra-axonal volume fraction | 0.43±0.04 | 0.43±0.06 | 0.53±0.05 | 0.54±0.06 |
Figure 2Examples of axon diameter maps (top row) and intra-axonal volume fraction maps (middle row).
ROIs are shown in the raw diffusion image (bottom row, b = 2000 s/mm2).
Figure 3Boxplot comparing the CST axon diameter and intra-axonal volume fraction between the controls and iNPH patients.
Statistical analyses revealed a significant increase in CST intra-axonal volume fraction at the paraventricular level in the patients, whereas no significant difference was observed in the axon diameter. At the level of the internal capsule, neither axon diameter nor intra-axonal volume fraction differed significantly between the two groups. * The significance level was set at p = 0.006 (Bonferroni's correction for multiple comparison).