BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: White matter alteration in iNPH has not been well-investigated. TBSS is a voxelwise statistical analysis developed for DTI data. We aimed to elucidate the cerebral white matter alteration in patients with iNPH by using DTI and to test the accuracy of TBSS analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DTI data were obtained from 20 patients with iNPH and 20 age- and sex-matched controls. The FA values were evaluated by using TBSS, region-of-interest and tract-specific analysis of the CST. The accuracy of TBSS analysis was tested by using "back-projection" of TBSS results and by comparing the TBSS analysis results with those of region-of-interest and tract-specific analysis. RESULTS: Back-projection of the TBSS results showed accurate registration of the whole brain, with the exception of parts of the thalamus, fornix, and white matter around the posterior body of the lateral ventricle. The TBSS analysis results were consistent with those of the region-of-interest analysis and tract-specific analysis. In patients with iNPH compared with control subjects, the FA values were significantly decreased in parts of the corpus callosum, periventricular white matter, and juxtacortical white matter in the frontal and parietal lobes. In contrast, FA values were significantly increased in the internal capsule, extending to the white matter in the centrum semiovale. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients with iNPH have various patterns of white matter damage and that TBSS analysis is a promising tool for performing accurate voxelwise statistical analysis of the iNPH brain, with the exception of misregistered areas.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: White matter alteration in iNPH has not been well-investigated. TBSS is a voxelwise statistical analysis developed for DTI data. We aimed to elucidate the cerebral white matter alteration in patients with iNPH by using DTI and to test the accuracy of TBSS analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DTI data were obtained from 20 patients with iNPH and 20 age- and sex-matched controls. The FA values were evaluated by using TBSS, region-of-interest and tract-specific analysis of the CST. The accuracy of TBSS analysis was tested by using "back-projection" of TBSS results and by comparing the TBSS analysis results with those of region-of-interest and tract-specific analysis. RESULTS: Back-projection of the TBSS results showed accurate registration of the whole brain, with the exception of parts of the thalamus, fornix, and white matter around the posterior body of the lateral ventricle. The TBSS analysis results were consistent with those of the region-of-interest analysis and tract-specific analysis. In patients with iNPH compared with control subjects, the FA values were significantly decreased in parts of the corpus callosum, periventricular white matter, and juxtacortical white matter in the frontal and parietal lobes. In contrast, FA values were significantly increased in the internal capsule, extending to the white matter in the centrum semiovale. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients with iNPH have various patterns of white matter damage and that TBSS analysis is a promising tool for performing accurate voxelwise statistical analysis of the iNPH brain, with the exception of misregistered areas.
Authors: H Stolze; J P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; H Drücke; K Jöhnk; M Illert; G Deuschl Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Niklas Lenfeldt; Anne Larsson; Lars Nyberg; Micael Andersson; Richard Birgander; Anders Eklund; Jan Malm Journal: Brain Date: 2008-10-18 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Daniel Rueckert; Thomas E Nichols; Clare E Mackay; Kate E Watkins; Olga Ciccarelli; M Zaheer Cader; Paul M Matthews; Timothy E J Behrens Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-04-19 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: A Rajagopal; J S Shimony; R C McKinstry; M Altaye; T Maloney; F T Mangano; D D Limbrick; S K Holland; B V Jones; S Simpson; D Mercer; W Yuan Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-09-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: B F M Rijken; A Leemans; Y Lucas; K van Montfort; I M J Mathijssen; M H Lequin Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M Ivkovic; B Liu; F Ahmed; D Moore; C Huang; A Raj; I Kovanlikaya; L Heier; N Relkin Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Yafell Serulle; Henry Rusinek; Ivan I Kirov; Hannah Milch; Els Fieremans; Alexander B Baxter; John McMenamy; Rajan Jain; Jeffrey Wisoff; James Golomb; Oded Gonen; Ajax E George Journal: J Neurol Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: A M Wong; H-S Wang; E S Schwartz; C-H Toh; R A Zimmerman; P-L Liu; Y-M Wu; S-H Ng; J-J Wang Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ramin Eskandari; Osama Abdullah; Cameron Mason; Kelley E Lloyd; Amanda N Oeschle; James P McAllister Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 1.475