OBJECTIVE: This study investigated stimulation strategies to increase the selectivity of activating axonal pathways within the brain based on their orientations relative to clinical deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead implants. APPROACH: Previous work has shown how varying electrode shape and controlling the primary electric field direction through preclinical electrode arrays can produce orientation-selective axonal stimulation. Here, we significantly extend those results using computational models to evaluate the degree to which clinical DBS leads can direct stimulus-induced electric fields and generate orientation-selective activation of fiber pathways in the brain. Orientation-selective pulse paradigms were evaluated in conceptual models and in patient-specific models of subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS for treating Parkinson's disease. MAIN RESULTS: Single-contact monopolar or two-contact bipolar stimulation through clinical DBS leads with cylindrical electrodes primarily activated axons orientated parallel to the lead. Conversely, multi-contact monopolar stimulation with a cathode-leading pulse waveform selectively activated axons perpendicular to the DBS lead. Clinical DBS leads with segmented rows of electrodes and a single current source provided additional angular resolution for activating axons oriented 0°, ±22.5°, ±45°, ±67.5°, or 90° relative to the lead shaft. Employing multiple independent current sources to deliver unequal amounts of current through these leads further increased the angular resolution of activation relative to the lead shaft. The patient-specific models indicated that multi-contact cathode configurations, which are rarely used in clinical practice, could increase activation of the hyperdirect pathway collaterals projecting into STN (a putative therapeutic target), while minimizing direct activation of the corticospinal tract of internal capsule, which can elicit sensorimotor side-effects when stimulated. SIGNIFICANCE: When combined with patient-specific tissue anisotropy and patient-specific anatomical morphologies of neural pathways responsible for therapy and side effects, orientation-selective DBS approaches show potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes of DBS therapy for a range of existing and investigational clinical indications.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated stimulation strategies to increase the selectivity of activating axonal pathways within the brain based on their orientations relative to clinical deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead implants. APPROACH: Previous work has shown how varying electrode shape and controlling the primary electric field direction through preclinical electrode arrays can produce orientation-selective axonal stimulation. Here, we significantly extend those results using computational models to evaluate the degree to which clinical DBS leads can direct stimulus-induced electric fields and generate orientation-selective activation of fiber pathways in the brain. Orientation-selective pulse paradigms were evaluated in conceptual models and in patient-specific models of subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS for treating Parkinson's disease. MAIN RESULTS: Single-contact monopolar or two-contact bipolar stimulation through clinical DBS leads with cylindrical electrodes primarily activated axons orientated parallel to the lead. Conversely, multi-contact monopolar stimulation with a cathode-leading pulse waveform selectively activated axons perpendicular to the DBS lead. Clinical DBS leads with segmented rows of electrodes and a single current source provided additional angular resolution for activating axons oriented 0°, ±22.5°, ±45°, ±67.5°, or 90° relative to the lead shaft. Employing multiple independent current sources to deliver unequal amounts of current through these leads further increased the angular resolution of activation relative to the lead shaft. The patient-specific models indicated that multi-contact cathode configurations, which are rarely used in clinical practice, could increase activation of the hyperdirect pathway collaterals projecting into STN (a putative therapeutic target), while minimizing direct activation of the corticospinal tract of internal capsule, which can elicit sensorimotor side-effects when stimulated. SIGNIFICANCE: When combined with patient-specific tissue anisotropy and patient-specific anatomical morphologies of neural pathways responsible for therapy and side effects, orientation-selective DBS approaches show potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes of DBS therapy for a range of existing and investigational clinical indications.
Authors: T E J Behrens; M W Woolrich; M Jenkinson; H Johansen-Berg; R G Nunes; S Clare; P M Matthews; J M Brady; S M Smith Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lauri J Lehto; Julia P Slopsema; Matthew D Johnson; Artem Shatillo; Benjamin A Teplitzky; Lynn Utecht; Gregor Adriany; Silvia Mangia; Alejandra Sierra; Walter C Low; Olli Gröhn; Shalom Michaeli Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2017-01-09 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Qian Li; Ya Ke; Danny C W Chan; Zhong-Ming Qian; Ken K L Yung; Ho Ko; Gordon W Arbuthnott; Wing-Ho Yung Journal: Neuron Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Edgar Peña; Simeng Zhang; Remi Patriat; Joshua E Aman; Jerrold L Vitek; Noam Harel; Matthew D Johnson Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2018-09-13 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Lauri J Lehto; Antonietta Canna; Lin Wu; Alejandra Sierra; Ekaterina Zhurakovskaya; Jun Ma; Clairice Pearce; Maple Shaio; Pavel Filip; Matthew D Johnson; Walter C Low; Olli Gröhn; Heikki Tanila; Silvia Mangia; Shalom Michaeli Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Gordon Duffley; Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Johannes Vorwerk; Alan D Dorval; Christopher R Butson Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Vinata Vedam-Mai; Karl Deisseroth; James Giordano; Gabriel Lazaro-Munoz; Winston Chiong; Nanthia Suthana; Jean-Philippe Langevin; Jay Gill; Wayne Goodman; Nicole R Provenza; Casey H Halpern; Rajat S Shivacharan; Tricia N Cunningham; Sameer A Sheth; Nader Pouratian; Katherine W Scangos; Helen S Mayberg; Andreas Horn; Kara A Johnson; Christopher R Butson; Ro'ee Gilron; Coralie de Hemptinne; Robert Wilt; Maria Yaroshinsky; Simon Little; Philip Starr; Greg Worrell; Prasad Shirvalkar; Edward Chang; Jens Volkmann; Muthuraman Muthuraman; Sergiu Groppa; Andrea A Kühn; Luming Li; Matthew Johnson; Kevin J Otto; Robert Raike; Steve Goetz; Chengyuan Wu; Peter Silburn; Binith Cheeran; Yagna J Pathak; Mahsa Malekmohammadi; Aysegul Gunduz; Joshua K Wong; Stephanie Cernera; Wei Hu; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Wissam Deeb; Addie Patterson; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Antonietta Canna; Lauri J Lehto; Lin Wu; Sheng Sang; Hanne Laakso; Jun Ma; Pavel Filip; Yuan Zhang; Olli Gröhn; Fabrizio Esposito; Clark C Chen; Igor Lavrov; Shalom Michaeli; Silvia Mangia Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Jessica Frey; Jackson Cagle; Kara A Johnson; Joshua K Wong; Justin D Hilliard; Christopher R Butson; Michael S Okun; Coralie de Hemptinne Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Alan D Dorval; John D Rolston; Stefan M Pulst; Collin J Anderson Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Angela M Noecker; Anneke M Frankemolle-Gilbert; Bryan Howell; Mikkel V Petersen; Sinem Balta Beylergil; Aasef G Shaikh; Cameron C McIntyre Journal: Neuromodulation Date: 2021-01-03