| Literature DB >> 25093589 |
Shannon Dillon1, Rachel McEvoy2, Darren S Baldwin3, Gavin N Rees3, Yvonne Parsons2, Simon Southerton1.
Abstract
As an increasing number of ecosystems face departures from long standing environmental conditions under climate change, our understanding of the capacity of species to adapt will become important for directing conservation and management of biodiversity. Insights into the potential for genetic adaptation might be gained by assessing genomic signatures of adaptation to historic or prevailing environmental conditions. The river red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.) is a widespread Australian eucalypt inhabiting riverine and floodplain habitats which spans strong environmental gradients. We investigated the effects of adaptation to environment on population level genetic diversity of E. camaldulensis, examining SNP variation in candidate gene loci sampled across 20 climatically diverse populations approximating the species natural distribution. Genetic differentiation among populations was high (F(ST) = 17%), exceeding previous estimates based on neutral markers. Complementary statistical approaches identified 6 SNP loci in four genes (COMT, Dehydrin, ERECTA and PIP2) which, after accounting for demographic effects, exhibited higher than expected levels of genetic differentiation among populations and whose allelic variation was associated with local environment. While this study employs but a small proportion of available diversity in the eucalyptus genome, it draws our attention to the potential for application of wide spread eucalypt species to test adaptive hypotheses.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25093589 PMCID: PMC4122390 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103515
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
E. camaldulensis populations sampled at 20 sites across Australia.
| population | region | state | taxon | no. | latitude | longitude | CLIMPCA 1 | CLIMPCA2 | ECOLPCA 1 | ECOLPCA2 | GEOGPCA1 | GEOGPCA2 |
| Barmah | Murray-Darling Basin | NSW |
| 10 | −35.50 | 145.07 | −3.20 | −0.27 | 1.35 | 0.13 | −1.30 | 0.93 |
| Boolcunda Creek | Spencer Gulf | SA |
| 10 | −32.18 | 138.28 | −2.33 | 0.90 | −0.65 | 0.21 | 0.60 | 1.34 |
| Bunyeroo Creek | Spencer Gulf | SA |
| 10 | −31.24 | 138.25 | −1.57 | 1.52 | −0.66 | 0.53 | −0.15 | 1.08 |
| Edith River | Northern Australia | NT |
| 10 | −14.11 | 132.02 | 2.86 | −3.14 | 1.67 | 0.92 | −0.83 | −1.19 |
| Elong | Western Australia | WA |
| 10 | −25.15 | 116.41 | 1.66 | 2.04 | −1.53 | 0.09 | 1.35 | −1.85 |
| Fitzroy Crossing | Northern Australia | WA |
| 7 | −18.11 | 125.36 | 3.20 | 0.54 | 0.01 | 0.02 | −0.01 | −1.89 |
| Fortescue | Western Australia | WA |
| 9 | −21.18 | 116.09 | 2.87 | 1.14 | −1.14 | 0.13 | −0.94 | −2.07 |
| Giles Creek | Central Australia | WA |
| 10 | −25.04 | 128.40 | 0.95 | 2.67 | −0.81 | 0.12 | 3.60 | −0.25 |
| Hillston | Murray-Darling Basin | NSW |
| 10 | −33.37 | 145.18 | −2.16 | 0.36 | −0.63 | 0.16 | −1.73 | 1.67 |
| Huddleston | Spencer Gulf | SA |
| 5 | −33.20 | 138.20 | −3.04 | −0.48 | 2.94 | 1.16 | 1.04 | 0.54 |
| Kooline | Western Australia | WA |
| 10 | −22.55 | 116.17 | 2.49 | 1.91 | −1.08 | 0.07 | 0.58 | −0.59 |
| Laura River | North Eastern Australia | QLD |
| 10 | −15.39 | 144.31 | 1.42 | −2.92 | 0.07 | −0.46 | −1.70 | −0.99 |
| Mitchell River | North Eastern Australia | QLD |
| 10 | −16.31 | 143.38 | 1.99 | −2.20 | −0.51 | −0.08 | −1.41 | 0.14 |
| Normanby River | North Eastern Australia | QLD |
| 10 | −15.18 | 144.51 | 1.34 | −3.29 | 1.01 | −4.14 | −0.86 | −0.19 |
| Palmer River | Central Australia | NT |
| 10 | −24.34 | 132.47 | 0.26 | 2.15 | −0.87 | −0.03 | 3.24 | 0.39 |
| Towong | Murray-Darling Basin | NSW |
| 10 | −36.08 | 148.00 | −4.21 | −2.51 | 1.79 | −0.03 | −0.13 | 2.25 |
| Victoria River (lower) | Northern Australia | NT |
| 10 | −15.37 | 130.28 | 2.44 | −1.52 | 1.02 | 0.44 | −2.24 | −1.10 |
| Warburton | Central Australia | WA |
| 10 | −26.09 | 126.33 | 1.07 | 2.67 | −1.22 | 0.07 | 2.42 | 0.04 |
| Wentworth | Murray-Darling Basin | NSW |
| 10 | −34.07 | 141.55 | −2.62 | 0.51 | −0.39 | 0.40 | −0.99 | 1.39 |
| Wirrengren Plain | Murray-Darling Basin | VIC |
| 10 | −35.26 | 141.53 | −3.41 | −0.07 | −0.37 | 0.28 | −0.53 | 0.33 |
no. = number of trees sampled per population.
Populations are a sub sample from the collection of Butcher et al. [40].
Subspecies nomenclature as per [95].
Principal component variables were calculated from three sets of environmental parameters relating to climate, ecology and geography.
Figure 1Location of E. camaldulensis populations sampled at 20 sites across mainland Australia.
Occurrence records of E. camaldulensis downloaded from the Atlas of Living Australia (small circles) approximate the distribution of this species, which does not occur in Tasmania.
Candidate genes examined across E. camaldulensis populations.
| abbreviated name | gene name |
| length | putative function |
| CAD | Cinnamyl-Alcohol Dehydrogenase | Eucgr.G01350 | 900 | lignin biosynthesis, |
| CCR | Cinnamoyl-CoA Reductase | Eucgr.J03114 | 6000 | lignin biosynthesis, |
| CesA1 | Cellulose Synthase 1 | Eucgr.D00476 | 7000 | cellulose biosynthesis, |
| CesA3 | Cellulose Synthase 3 | Eucgr.C00246 | 7000 | cellulose biosynthesis, |
| COBL4 | COBRA4 like gene | Eucgr.J01392 | 3000 | cellulose biosynthesis, |
| COMT | Caffeate 3-O-methyltransferase 1 | Eucgr.A01397 | 2000 | lignin biosynthesis, |
| Dehydrin | Dehydrin like protein | Eucgr.I00186 | 1000 | water stress response, |
| ERECTA | Erecta leucine rich repeat protein | Eucgr.C0073 | 4500 | water use efficiency, |
| Korrigan | Korrigan (Endo-1,4-β-Glucanase) | Eucgr.G00035 | 2500 | cell wall expansion, |
| MYB4 | MYB4 Transcription Factor | Eucgr.G03385 | 1800 | lignin biosynthesiş |
| bZIP | bZip Transcription Factor | Eucgr.F01867 | 9000 | lignin biosynthesis, |
| PIP2 | Plasma Membrane Intrinsic Protein | Eucgr.D02548 | 3500 | water stress response, |
*gene ID from annotated E. grandis genome sequence (www.phytozome.net).
**length of sequenced gene region in base pairs.
54].
Significance in multiple tests for selection suggest diversity at SNP loci from four genes may reflect local adaptation.
| Outlier tests | Association tests | Partial Mantel | |||||||||||||
| locus | gene | SNP | type | FST Fdist | p-valFidst | FST BayeScan | Log(odds)BayeScan | ENV | p-valWald | p-valLRT | p-valGLM | R2 GLM | Log(odds)MCMC | R2 Mantel | p-valMantel |
| SNP29 | COMT | A/G | silent | 0.4 | 2.80E–03 | 0.21 | ns | ECOLPCA1 | 8.83E–07 | 1.40E–07 | 0.001 | 0.122 | 0.51 | 0.027 | 0.102 |
| CLIMPCA2 | 8.35E–06 | 8.07E–06 | 0.002 | 0.074 | 0.70 | 0.005 | 0.218 | ||||||||
| SNP32 | Dehydrin | A/G | synonymous | 0.34 | 6.80E–03 | 0.26 | ns | CLIMPCA1 | 9.76E–05 | 1.08E–04 | 0.001 | 0.061 | 0.62 | 0.041 | 0.009 |
| GEOGPCA2 | 6.35E–06 | 4.24E–06 | 0.001 | 0.088 | ns | 0.102 | 0.002 | ||||||||
| SNP33 | Dehydrin | G/T | synonymous | 0.40 | 2.10E–03 | 0.30 | ns | GEOGPCA2 | ns | ns | 0.017 | 0.043 | 0.54 | 0.123 | 0.001 |
| SNP37 | ERECTA | G/T | silent | 0.45 | 2.00E–05 | 0.42 | 1.74 | CLIMPCA1 | 6.68E–11 | 5.55E–15 | 0.024 | 0.033 | ns | 0.192 | 0.0001 |
| GEOGPCA2 | ns | ns | 0.054 | 0.039 | ns | 0.102 | 0.001 | ||||||||
| SNP56 | PIP2 | C/T | synonymous | 0.34 | 6.20E–03 | 0.31 | 0.54 | CLIMPCA1 | 1.67E–09 | 6.66E–16 | ns | ns | ns | 0.292 | 0.0001 |
| GEOGPCA2 | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | 0.096 | 0.001 | ||||||||
| SNP58 | PIP2 | C/T | silent | 0.45 | 8.30E–04 | 0.37 | 1.78 | CLIMPCA1 | 2.19E–11 | 3.33E–16 | 0.014 | 0.041 | 0.91 | 0.102 | 0.001 |
FST: Wright's fixation index estimated in Fdist or Bayescan.
p-val Fdist: significance of outlier test with hierarchical structure.
ENV: component variables derived from environmental data.
p-valueWald = significance of Wald test in SAM.
p-value LRT = significance of likelihood ratio test in SAM.
Log(odds): logarithm (base 10) of Posterior Odds for alternative model in BayeScan and the MCMC method of Coop et al. 2010.
p-valGLM: significance of association test with environment in Tassel.
R2 GLM: proportion of environmental variance explained by SNP in Tassel.
R2 Mantel: correlation between environment and SNP FST matrices.
p-valMantel: significance of Mantel correlation.
*Significance level (α) for partial Mantel test while performing Bonferoni correction was 0.001.
Figure 2FST estimates for individual SNP loci and whole genes plotted as a function of heterozygosity.
FST estimates were also plotted for the set of 15 SSR markers applied in Bucher et al. 2009. FST estimates for SNPs or genes that sat above the upper or lower boundary of the neutral envelope simulated in Arlequin were considered as potential targets of diversifying or homogenising selection respectively.
Figure 3Covariance between average heterozygosity and environment (CLIMPCA1) among populations for 10 outlier SNP loci (white circles: R2 = 0.47; p<0.001) 49 non-outlier SNP loci (black circles: R2 = 0.002; p<0.85) and 15 nuSSR markers (grey circles: R2 = 0.008; p<0.72).
Average heterozygosity for SNP and nuSSR markers are plotted against the left and right vertical axes respectively.
Figure 4Minor allele frequency plotted as a function of environment (CLIMPCA1) for two outlier loci (top), for SNP 58 (C allele plotted, C/T SNP) (PIP2) and SNP 37 (G allele plotted, G/T SNP) (ERECTA); (middle) significant genotypic associations are illustrated as box plots for CLIMPCA1 as a function of genotype, and (bottom) in each case the map illustrates spatial and environmental structuring of allelic diversity, potentially reflecting local adaptation at these loci.
The R2 and p-values displayed on each plot represent the proportion of variance in environmental parameters explained by the SNP maker and significance of the observed relationship.
Figure 5Covariance of pairwise genetic differentiation (FST) for SNP58 (PIP2 gene) and environment may be indicative of adaptive genetic structure, as suggested by pairwise population FST for SNP 58 visualised as a function of (a pairwise population dissimilarity for climPCA1, and b) pairwise population dissimilarity for climPCA1 adjusted for demographic effects on genetic diversity, where both variables are plotted as the residuals of their linear model with population pairwise FST based on 15 putatively neutral SSR loci [40].
Population pairwise FST for SNP58 exhibited significant covariance with estimates for two putatively adaptive loci c) SNP37 (ERECTA), and d) SNP56 (PIP2). Correlation coefficients (R squared) and p values for Mantel (a, c, d) and partial Mantel (b) tests are presented in each case.