Literature DB >> 18006185

Adaptation from standing genetic variation.

Rowan D H Barrett1, Dolph Schluter.   

Abstract

Populations adapt to novel environments in two distinct ways: selection on pre-existing genetic variation and selection on new mutations. These alternative sources of beneficial alleles can result in different evolutionary dynamics and distinct genetic outcomes. Compared with new mutations, adaptation from standing genetic variation is likely to lead to faster evolution, the fixation of more alleles of small effect and the spread of more recessive alleles. There is potential to distinguish between adaptation from standing variation and that from new mutations by differences in the genomic signature of selection. Here we review these approaches and possible examples of adaptation from standing variation in natural populations. Understanding how the source of genetic variation affects adaptation will be integral for predicting how populations will respond to changing environments.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006185     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  509 in total

1.  Widespread genomic divergence during sympatric speciation.

Authors:  Andrew P Michel; Sheina Sim; Thomas H Q Powell; Michael S Taylor; Patrik Nosil; Jeffrey L Feder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Massively parallel sequencing and analysis of expressed sequence tags in a successful invasive plant.

Authors:  Peter J Prentis; Megan Woolfit; Skye R Thomas-Hall; Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos; Ana Pavasovic; Andrew J Lowe; Peer M Schenk
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Adaptive impact of the chimeric gene Quetzalcoatl in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Rebekah L Rogers; Trevor Bedford; Ana M Lyons; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A test for selection employing quantitative trait locus and mutation accumulation data.

Authors:  Daniel P Rice; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genomics: Stickleback is the catch of the day.

Authors:  Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Establishment of new mutations under divergence and genome hitchhiking.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Feder; Richard Gejji; Sam Yeaman; Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Genomic divergence during speciation: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil; Jeffrey L Feder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Population genomics of parallel phenotypic evolution in stickleback across stream-lake ecological transitions.

Authors:  Bruce E Deagle; Felicity C Jones; Yingguang F Chan; Devin M Absher; David M Kingsley; Thomas E Reimchen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Trophic specialization influences the rate of environmental niche evolution in damselfishes (Pomacentridae).

Authors:  Glenn Litsios; Loïc Pellissier; Félix Forest; Christian Lexer; Peter B Pearman; Niklaus E Zimmermann; Nicolas Salamin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Convergence in pigmentation at multiple levels: mutations, genes and function.

Authors:  Marie Manceau; Vera S Domingues; Catherine R Linnen; Erica Bree Rosenblum; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.