Literature DB >> 22039007

Evolution and ecology meet molecular genetics: adaptive phenotypic plasticity in two isolated Negev desert populations of Acacia raddiana at either end of a rainfall gradient.

David Ward1, Madan K Shrestha, Avi Golan-Goldhirsh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The ecological, evolutionary and genetic bases of population differentiation in a variable environment are often related to the selection pressures that plants experience. We compared differences in several growth- and defence-related traits in two isolated populations of Acacia raddiana trees from sites at either end of an extreme environmental gradient in the Negev desert.
METHODS: We used random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) to determine the molecular differences between populations. We grew plants under two levels of water, three levels of nutrients and three levels of herbivory to test for phenotypic plasticity and adaptive phenotypic plasticity. KEY
RESULTS: The RAPD analyses showed that these populations are highly genetically differentiated. Phenotypic plasticity in various morphological traits in A. raddiana was related to patterns of population genetic differentiation between the two study sites. Although we did not test for maternal effects in these long-lived trees, significant genotype × environment (G × E) interactions in some of these traits indicated that such plasticity may be adaptive.
CONCLUSIONS: The main selection pressure in this desert environment, perhaps unsurprisingly, is water. Increased water availability resulted in greater growth in the southern population, which normally receives far less rain than the northern population. Even under the conditions that we defined as low water and/or nutrients, the performance of the seedlings from the southern population was significantly better, perhaps reflecting selection for these traits. Consistent with previous studies of this genus, there was no evidence of trade-offs between physical and chemical defences and plant growth parameters in this study. Rather, there appeared to be positive correlations between plant size and defence parameters. The great variation in several traits in both populations may result in a diverse potential for responding to selection pressures in different environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22039007      PMCID: PMC3241593          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcr276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  25 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of trade-offs among plant antiherbivore defenses: are plants jacks-of-all-trades, masters of all?

Authors:  Julia Koricheva; Heli Nykänen; Ernesto Gianoli
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-02-23       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Constraints on the evolution of adaptive phenotypic plasticity in plants.

Authors:  Mark van Kleunen; Markus Fischer
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Distinguishing adaptive from nonadaptive genetic differentiation: comparison of Q(ST) and F(ST) at two spatial scales.

Authors:  S Volis; B Yakubov; I Shulgina; D Ward; S Mendlinger
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Timing of cotyledon damage affects growth and flowering in mature plants.

Authors:  M E Hanley; E L Fegan
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.228

5.  Plant defense, growth, and habitat: a comparative assessment of constitutive and induced resistance.

Authors:  Peter A Van Zandt
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense.

Authors:  P D Coley; J P Bryant; F S Chapin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Terrestrial plant tolerance to herbivory.

Authors:  J P Rosenthal; P M Kotanen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Does environmental variation maintain genetic variation? A question of scale.

Authors:  T Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity.

Authors:  T J Dewitt; A Sih; D S Wilson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 10.  What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments.

Authors:  T V Perneger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-18
View more
  2 in total

1.  Experimental test for adaptive differentiation of ginseng populations reveals complex response to temperature.

Authors:  Sara Souther; Martin J Lechowicz; James B McGraw
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Characterisation of adaptive genetic diversity in environmentally contrasted populations of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. (river red gum).

Authors:  Shannon Dillon; Rachel McEvoy; Darren S Baldwin; Gavin N Rees; Yvonne Parsons; Simon Southerton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.