Literature DB >> 11277451

Coloring single stroop elements: reducing automaticity or slowing color processing?

J S Monahan1.   

Abstract

Automaticity theory and the effect of coloring a single element were tested with all or only 1 element colored in Stroop tasks. The 312 participants in 5 experiments indicated stimulus presentation color by key press. Experiments 1 and 2 replicated those of D. Besner, J. A. Stoltz, and C. Boutilier (1997) with some changes, and revealed similar results: less Stroop interference with only 1 letter colored. Besner et al. (1997) interpreted the results as indicating that coloring a single letter eliminates automatic reading processes. The cause of that reduction in Stroop interference was investigated in Experiments 3, 4, and 5 using color words, bars, and rectangles. The effect of coloring 1 element was to increase color-naming time by the same amount for congruent and neutral, nonverbal stimuli, but not for incongruent stimuli. The results are interpreted in terms of automaticity theory, and a continuous flow approach to the Stroop effect is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11277451     DOI: 10.1080/00221300109598901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Psychol        ISSN: 0022-1309


  7 in total

1.  The Role of Visual Stimuli in Cross-Modal Stroop Interference.

Authors:  Danielle A Lutfi-Proctor; Emily M Elliott; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psych J       Date:  2014-03-01

2.  Behavioral and electrophysiological investigation of semantic and response conflict in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Maria Augustinova; Laetitia Silvert; Ludovic Ferrand; Pierre Michel Llorca; Valentin Flaudias
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04

Review 3.  The loci of Stroop effects: a critical review of methods and evidence for levels of processing contributing to color-word Stroop effects and the implications for the loci of attentional selection.

Authors:  Benjamin A Parris; Nabil Hasshim; Michael Wadsley; Maria Augustinova; Ludovic Ferrand
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-08-13

4.  Alcohol attentional bias: drinking salience or cognitive impairment?

Authors:  Javad Salehi Fadardi; W Miles Cox
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Comparing perception of Stroop stimuli in focused versus divided attention paradigms: evidence for dramatic processing differences.

Authors:  Ami Eidels; James T Townsend; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-09-05

6.  Strategies that reduce Stroop interference.

Authors:  B Palfi; B A Parris; A F Collins; Z Dienes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Components of Attention in Grapheme-Color Synesthesia: A Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Árni Gunnar Ásgeirsson; Maria Nordfang; Thomas Alrik Sørensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.