Literature DB >> 25090306

Influence of depressive symptoms on speech perception in adverse listening conditions.

Bharath Chandrasekaran1, Kristin Van Engen, Zilong Xie, Christopher G Beevers, W Todd Maddox.   

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that individuals with elevated depressive symptoms exhibit deficits in inter-personal communication. Research has primarily focused on speech production in individuals with elevated depressive symptoms. Little is known about speech perception in individuals with elevated depressive symptoms, especially in challenging listening conditions. Here, we examined speech perception in young adults with low- or high-depressive (HD) symptoms in the presence of a range of maskers. Maskers were selected to reflect various levels of informational masking (IM), which refers to cognitive interference due to signal and masker similarity, and energetic masking (EM), which refers to peripheral interference due to signal degradation by the masker. Speech intelligibility data revealed that individuals with HD symptoms did not differ from those with low-depressive symptoms during EM, but they exhibited a selective deficit during IM. Since IM is a common occurrence in real-world social settings, this listening deficit may exacerbate communicative difficulties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CES-D; Communication; Depression; Informational masking; Speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25090306      PMCID: PMC4317380          DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2014.944106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Emot        ISSN: 0269-9931


  18 in total

1.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers.

Authors:  D S Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception.

Authors:  Martin Cooke; M L Garcia Lecumberri; Jon Barker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Assessing depressive symptoms in five psychiatric populations: a validation study.

Authors:  M M Weissman; D Sholomskas; M Pottenger; B A Prusoff; B Z Locke
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Epidemiology of DSM-III-R major depression and minor depression among adolescents and young adults in the National Comorbidity Survey.

Authors:  R C Kessler; E E Walters
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.505

5.  Qualitative analysis of verbal fluency in depression.

Authors:  Philippe Fossati; Le Bastard Guillaume; Anne-Marie Ergis; Jean-François Allilaire
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2003-01-25       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Cognitive function in major depression.

Authors:  M P Austin; M Ross; C Murray; R E O'Carroll; K P Ebmeier; G M Goodwin
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Linguistic analysis of speech in affective disorders.

Authors:  N G Andreasen; B Pfohl
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1976-11

8.  The nature and determinants of neuropsychological functioning in late-life depression.

Authors:  Meryl A Butters; Ellen M Whyte; Robert D Nebes; Amy E Begley; Mary Amanda Dew; Benoit H Mulsant; Michelle D Zmuda; Rishi Bhalla; Carolyn Cidis Meltzer; Bruce G Pollock; Charles F Reynolds; James T Becker
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2004-06

9.  The epidemiology of major depressive disorder: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R).

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Patricia Berglund; Olga Demler; Robert Jin; Doreen Koretz; Kathleen R Merikangas; A John Rush; Ellen E Walters; Philip S Wang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  A positron emission tomography study of the neural basis of informational and energetic masking effects in speech perception.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Stuart Rosen; Lindsay Wickham; Richard J S Wise
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  Error patterns of native and non-native listeners' perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  Benjamin D Zinszer; Meredith Riggs; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The Downside of Greater Lexical Influences: Selectively Poorer Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Boji P W Lam; Zilong Xie; Rachel Tessmer; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The Effect of Talker and Listener Depressive Symptoms on Speech Intelligibility.

Authors:  Hoyoung Yi; Rajka Smiljanic; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene modulates the influence of informational masking on speech recognition.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; W Todd Maddox; Valerie S Knopik; John E McGeary; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Impact of depression on speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Benjamin D Zinszer; Meredith Riggs; Christopher G Beevers; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Face mask type affects audiovisual speech intelligibility and subjective listening effort in young and older adults.

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Kristin J Van Engen; Jonathan E Peelle
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-07-18

7.  Autonomic Nervous System Responses During Perception of Masked Speech may Reflect Constructs other than Subjective Listening Effort.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Megan K MacPherson; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Ann M Alvar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.