CONTEXT: Cognitive impairment in late-life depression (LLD) is highly prevalent, disabling, poorly understood, and likely related to long-term outcome. OBJECTIVES: To determine the characteristics and determinants of neuropsychological functioning LLD. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of groups of LLD patients and control subjects. SETTING: Outpatient, university-based depression research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred patients without dementia 60 years and older who met DSM-IV criteria for current episode of unipolar major depression (nonpsychotic) and 40 nondepressed, age- and education-equated control subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A comprehensive neuropsychological battery. RESULTS: Relative to control subjects, LLD patients performed poorer in all cognitive domains. More than half exhibited significant impairment (performance below the 10th percentile of the control group). Information processing speed and visuospatial and executive abilities were the most broadly and frequently impaired. The neuropsychological impairments were mediated almost entirely by slowed information processing (beta =.45-.80). Education (beta =.32) and ventricular atrophy (beta =.28) made additional modest contributions to variance in measures of language ability. Medical and vascular disease burden, apolipoprotein E genotype, and serum anticholinergicity did not contribute to variance in any cognitive domain. CONCLUSIONS: Late-life depression is characterized by slowed information processing, which affects all realms of cognition. This supports the concept that frontostriatal dysfunction plays a key role in LLD. The putative role of some risk factors was validated (eg, advanced age, low education, depression severity), whereas others were not (eg, medical burden, age at onset of first depressive episode). Further studies of neuropsychological functioning in remitted LLD patients are needed to parse episode-related and persistent factors and to relate them to underlying neural dysfunction.
CONTEXT: Cognitive impairment in late-life depression (LLD) is highly prevalent, disabling, poorly understood, and likely related to long-term outcome. OBJECTIVES: To determine the characteristics and determinants of neuropsychological functioning LLD. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of groups of LLD patients and control subjects. SETTING:Outpatient, university-based depression research clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred patients without dementia 60 years and older who met DSM-IV criteria for current episode of unipolar major depression (nonpsychotic) and 40 nondepressed, age- and education-equated control subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A comprehensive neuropsychological battery. RESULTS: Relative to control subjects, LLD patients performed poorer in all cognitive domains. More than half exhibited significant impairment (performance below the 10th percentile of the control group). Information processing speed and visuospatial and executive abilities were the most broadly and frequently impaired. The neuropsychological impairments were mediated almost entirely by slowed information processing (beta =.45-.80). Education (beta =.32) and ventricular atrophy (beta =.28) made additional modest contributions to variance in measures of language ability. Medical and vascular disease burden, apolipoprotein E genotype, and serum anticholinergicity did not contribute to variance in any cognitive domain. CONCLUSIONS:Late-life depression is characterized by slowed information processing, which affects all realms of cognition. This supports the concept that frontostriatal dysfunction plays a key role in LLD. The putative role of some risk factors was validated (eg, advanced age, low education, depression severity), whereas others were not (eg, medical burden, age at onset of first depressive episode). Further studies of neuropsychological functioning in remitted LLD patients are needed to parse episode-related and persistent factors and to relate them to underlying neural dysfunction.
Authors: Charles F Reynolds; Meryl A Butters; Oscar Lopez; Bruce G Pollock; Mary Amanda Dew; Benoit H Mulsant; Eric J Lenze; Margo Holm; Joan C Rogers; Sati Mazumdar; Patricia R Houck; Amy Begley; Stewart Anderson; Jordan F Karp; Mark D Miller; Ellen M Whyte; Jacqueline Stack; Ariel Gildengers; Katalin Szanto; Salem Bensasi; Daniel I Kaufer; M Ilyas Kamboh; Steven T DeKosky Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2011-01
Authors: Joseph S Goveas; Mark A Espeland; Patricia E Hogan; Hilary A Tindle; Regina A Shih; Jane M Kotchen; Jennifer G Robinson; Deborah E Barnes; Susan M Resnick Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Chih-Chuan Pan; Douglas R McQuoid; Warren D Taylor; Martha E Payne; Allison Ashley-Koch; David C Steffens Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Nunzio Pomara; P Murali Doraiswamy; Lisa M Willoughby; Amy E Roth; Benoit H Mulsant; John J Sidtis; Pankaj D Mehta; Charles F Reynolds; Bruce G Pollock Journal: Neurochem Res Date: 2006-04-01 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Stéphane Richard-Devantoy; Katalin Szanto; Meryl A Butters; Jan Kalkus; Alexandre Y Dombrovski Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Abraão Tiago Batista Guimarães; Raissa de Oliveira Ferreira; Joyce Moreira de Souza; Wellington Alves Mizael da Silva; Anderson Rodrigo da Silva; Aline Sueli de LimaRodrigues; Daniela de Melo E Silva; Renata Mazaro E Costa; André Luis da Silva Castro; Guilherme Malafaia Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 4.223