Literature DB >> 25086813

Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care: improvements in breast cancer quality indicators during a 3-year interval.

Christine Laronga1, Jhanelle E Gray2, Erin M Siegel3, Ji-Hyun Lee4, William J Fulp4, Michelle Fletcher5, Fred Schreiber6, Richard Brown7, Richard Levine8, Thomas Cartwright9, Guillermo Abesada-Terk10, George Kim11, Carlos Alemany12, Douglas Faig13, Phillip Sharp14, Merry-Jennifer Markham15, David Shibata16, Mokenge Malafa16, Paul B Jacobsen5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care (FIQCC), composed of 11 practice sites across Florida, conducted its initial evaluation of adherence to breast cancer quality of care indicators (QCI) in 2006, with feedback provided to encourage quality improvement efforts at participating sites. In this study, our objective was to reassess changes over time resulting from these efforts. STUDY
DESIGN: Quality care indicators were derived from the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the American College of Surgeons, and expert panel consensus. Medical records were reviewed for breast cancer patients first seen by medical oncologists in 2009 at the FIQCC sites, using the same performance indicators as in 2006. Statistical comparisons of 2006 vs 2009 data across sites were made by Pearson chi-square exact test using Monte Carlo estimation.
RESULTS: Charts of 602 patients in 2006 and 636 patients in 2009 were compared. Performance on medical oncology QCI improved over time for documentation of clinical trial participation discussion (p = 0.001), documentation of consent for chemotherapy (p = 0.047), definitive surgery done after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.017), and planned dose of chemotherapy consistent with published regimens (p = 0.02). Improvements in surgical QCI were seen for documentation of specimen orientation (p < 0.001), inking of margins (p < 0.0001), and performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: The 2006 FIQCC study identified several medical and surgical oncology QCI improvement needs. Quality improvement efforts resulted in better performance for numerous metrics, therefore speaking to the benefits of reassessment of adherence to performance indicators to guide QCI efforts.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25086813      PMCID: PMC4505727          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  22 in total

1.  Results of a cooperative educational program to improve prostate pathology reports among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Pascal James Imperato; Jerry Waisman; Marcia Wallen; Veronica Pryor; Mary Rojas; Kathleen Giardelli; Maryanne Daley
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2002-02

2.  A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression.

Authors:  Georg Heinze; Michael Schemper
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Evaluating the quality of psychosocial care in outpatient medical oncology settings using performance indicators.

Authors:  Paul B Jacobsen; David Shibata; Erin M Siegel; Ji-Hyun Lee; William J Fulp; Carlos Alemany; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; Richard Brown; Thomas Cartwright; Douglas Faig; George Kim; Richard Levine; Merry-Jennifer Markham; Fred Schreiber; Philip Sharp; Mokenge Malafa
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.

Authors:  Michael N Neuss; Christopher E Desch; Kristen K McNiff; Peter D Eisenberg; Dean H Gesme; Joseph O Jacobson; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Jennifer J Padberg; John M Rainey; Jeff J Guo; Joseph V Simone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Adequacy of surgical pathology reporting of cancer: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 86 institutions.

Authors:  Michael O Idowu; Leonas G Bekeris; Stephen Raab; Stephen G Ruby; Raouf E Nakhleh
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Measuring quality of care in the treatment of colorectal cancer: the moffitt quality practice initiative.

Authors:  Paul B Jacobsen; David Shibata; Erin M Siegel; Mihaela Druta; Ji-Hyun Lee; Jan Marshburn; Linda Davenport; Hugh Cruse; Richard Levine; Avantica Gondi; Richard Brown; Mokenge Malafa
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Utilization of breast conserving therapy in stages 0, I, and II breast cancer patients in New Jersey: an American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) analysis.

Authors:  Parima Daroui; Molly Gabel; Atif J Khan; Bruce G Haffty; Sharad Goyal
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.339

8.  Initial evaluation of quality indicators for psychosocial care of adults with cancer.

Authors:  Paul B Jacobsen; David Shibata; Erin M Siegel; Ji-Hyun Lee; Carlos A Alemany; Richard Brown; Thomas H Cartwright; Richard M Levine; Jesusa Corazon R Smith; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; Mokenge P Malafa
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 9.  Using the NCDB for cancer care improvement: an introduction to available quality assessment tools.

Authors:  Mehul V Raval; Karl Y Bilimoria; Andrew K Stewart; David J Bentrem; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Evaluating the quality of colorectal cancer care in the state of Florida: results from the Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care.

Authors:  Erin M Siegel; Paul B Jacobsen; Mokenge Malafa; William Fulp; Michelle Fletcher; Ji-Hyun Lee; Jesusa Corazon R Smith; Richard Brown; Richard Levine; Thomas Cartwright; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; George Kim; Carlos Alemany; Douglas Faig; Philip Sharp; Merry-Jennifer Markham; David Shibata
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Compliance with clinical guidelines for breast cancer management: A population-based study of quality-of-care indicators in France.

Authors:  Anne Cowppli-Bony; Brigitte Trétarre; Emilie Marrer; Gautier Defossez; Laetitia Daubisse-Marliac; Gaelle Coureau; Pamela Minicozzi; Anne-Sophie Woronoff; Patricia Delafosse; Florence Molinié
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Longitudinal cohort study to determine effectiveness of a novel simulated case and feedback system to improve clinical pathway adherence in breast, lung and GI cancers.

Authors:  Timothy Kubal; Doug G Letson; Alberto A Chiappori; Gregory M Springett; Riti Shimkhada; Diana Tamondong Lachica; John W Peabody
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Grading variation in 2,934 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the effect of laboratory- and pathologist-specific feedback reports.

Authors:  Carmen van Dooijeweert; Paul J van Diest; Inge O Baas; Elsken van der Wall; Ivette A G Deckers
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.644

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.