Literature DB >> 21325935

Utilization of breast conserving therapy in stages 0, I, and II breast cancer patients in New Jersey: an American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) analysis.

Parima Daroui1, Molly Gabel, Atif J Khan, Bruce G Haffty, Sharad Goyal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to determine the use of breast conservation surgery (BCS) followed by whole breast irradiation [BCS+radiation therapy (RT)] in stages 0, I, and II breast cancer patients treated in New Jersey using the National Cancer Database.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the data from 13 hospitals in New Jersey certified by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and members of the Cancer Institute of New Jersey's Network affiliates. Subjects with a first primary malignancy of the breast (stages 0, I, and II) treated from 2000 to 2006 were included in the analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 11,146 patients with stage 0 (n=2843), stage I (n=4757), and stage II (n=3546) were treated for their breast cancer. Of stage 0, I, and II patients, 72% (n=2053), 73% (n=3482), and 53% (n=1865) received BCS, respectively. Of these patients, 40% (n=826), 67.6% (n=2353), and 63% (n=1177) received adjuvant RT after BCS for their stages 0, I, and II, respectively. Use of BCS+RT was equivalent across racial groups and all ages, except patients above 70 years of age (61% <40 y, 57% 40 to 49 y, 60% 50 to 59 y, 65% 60 to 69 y, and 51% >70 y).
CONCLUSIONS: These data report an underutilization of RT after BCS in patients with stage 0 breast cancer treated across 13 hospitals in New Jersey. The Commission on Cancer's Rapid Quality Reporting System may be one method of identifying groups of patients not receiving care according to evidence-based guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21325935     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318209aa57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  5 in total

Review 1.  United States trends in the surgical treatment of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Todd M Tuttle; Natasha M Rueth; Andrea Abbott; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care: improvements in breast cancer quality indicators during a 3-year interval.

Authors:  Christine Laronga; Jhanelle E Gray; Erin M Siegel; Ji-Hyun Lee; William J Fulp; Michelle Fletcher; Fred Schreiber; Richard Brown; Richard Levine; Thomas Cartwright; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; George Kim; Carlos Alemany; Douglas Faig; Phillip Sharp; Merry-Jennifer Markham; David Shibata; Mokenge Malafa; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Racial/ethnic differences in breast cancer survival by inflammatory status and hormonal receptor status: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data.

Authors:  Jill K Schinkel; Shelia Hoar Zahm; Ismail Jatoi; Katherine A McGlynn; Christopher Gallagher; Catherine Schairer; Craig D Shriver; Kangmin Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Compliance with clinical guidelines for breast cancer management: A population-based study of quality-of-care indicators in France.

Authors:  Anne Cowppli-Bony; Brigitte Trétarre; Emilie Marrer; Gautier Defossez; Laetitia Daubisse-Marliac; Gaelle Coureau; Pamela Minicozzi; Anne-Sophie Woronoff; Patricia Delafosse; Florence Molinié
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Using relative survival measures for cross-sectional and longitudinal benchmarks of countries, states, and districts: the BenchRelSurv- and BenchRelSurvPlot-macros.

Authors:  Christian O Jacke; Iris Reinhard; Ute S Albert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.