Literature DB >> 19466738

Using the NCDB for cancer care improvement: an introduction to available quality assessment tools.

Mehul V Raval1, Karl Y Bilimoria, Andrew K Stewart, David J Bentrem, Clifford Y Ko.   

Abstract

Improving the quality of cancer care requires high-quality data, mechanisms to feed back information to hospitals, systems to act on the data, and participation of providers. The purpose of this review is to describe how the National Cancer Database (NCDB) can be utilized to improve the quality of cancer care in the United States through a variety of benchmarking reports and data feedback mechanisms available to hospitals approved by the Commission on Cancer (CoC).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19466738     DOI: 10.1002/jso.21173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  48 in total

1.  Implications of CA19-9 elevation for survival, staging, and treatment sequencing in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A national cohort analysis.

Authors:  John R Bergquist; Tommy Ivanics; Curtis B Storlie; Ryan T Groeschl; May C Tee; Elizabeth B Habermann; Rory L Smoot; Michael L Kendrick; Michael B Farnell; Lewis R Roberts; Gregory J Gores; David M Nagorney; Mark J Truty
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Propensity score analysis of the prognostic value of genomic assays for breast cancer in diverse populations using the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Abiola Ibraheem; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Use of radioiodine after thyroid lobectomy in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: does it change outcomes?

Authors:  Colleen M Kiernan; Alexander A Parikh; Lee L Parks; Carmen C Solórzano
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Adjuvant radioactive iodine therapy is associated with improved survival for patients with intermediate-risk papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Ewa Ruel; Samantha Thomas; Michaela Dinan; Jennifer M Perkins; Sanziana A Roman; Julie Ann Sosa
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Cytoreductive nephrectomy in the modern era: Predictors of use, morbidity, and survival.

Authors:  Brian J Minnillo; William Tabayoyong; John J Francis; Matthew J Maurice; Hui Zhu; Simon Kim; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  The role of clinicians in determining radioactive iodine use for low-risk thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Megan R Haymart; Mousumi Banerjee; Di Yang; Andrew K Stewart; Ronald J Koenig; Jennifer J Griggs
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Outcomes of Primary Colorectal Sarcoma: A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Review.

Authors:  Cornelius A Thiels; John R Bergquist; Adam C Krajewski; Hee Eun Lee; Heidi Nelson; Kellie L Mathis; Elizabeth B Habermann; Robert R Cima
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Disease severity and radioactive iodine use for thyroid cancer.

Authors:  M R Haymart; D G Muenz; A K Stewart; J J Griggs; M Banerjee
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Robotic thyroidectomy for cancer in the US: patterns of use and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam; Paul Speicher; John Pura; Michaela A Dinan; Shelby D Reed; Sanziana A Roman; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Laparoscopic staging for apparent stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Melamed; Nancy L Keating; Joel T Clemmer; Amy J Bregar; Jason D Wright; David M Boruta; John O Schorge; Marcela G Del Carmen; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.