Literature DB >> 25083029

Dentoskeletal Comparison of Changes Seen in Class II Cases Treated by Twin Block and Forsus.

Suchita Madhukar Tarvade1, Charushila Vinay Chaudhari1, Sadashiv Gopinath Daokar2, Suhas Shriram Biday1, Sheetal Ramkrishna1, Amit Satish Handa3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Forsus fatigue resistant devices (FRD) and twin-block (TB) appliance in Class II malocclusion cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty young adult patients (age 13-17 years, overjet 6-10 mm) with a Class II division 1 malocclusion were randomly divided into two groups: group I included 10 patients treated with TB, Group II included 10 patients treated with FRD. Dentoskeletal changes were analyzed on lateral cephalograms taken before (T1) and (T2) at the end of the treatment. Inter-group differences were evaluated with Wilcoxon signed rank test, and intra-group differences were assessed with Mann-Whitney test at the P < 0.05 level.
RESULTS: Both were useful in improving the esthetics. However, more AP skeletal changes were seen with TB appliances as compared with Forsus. Vertical skeletal measurements were increased after functional appliances. These results were more pronounced with Forsus appliance than TB. Increase in incisor mandibular plane angle was seen in both groups, but was found to be more pronounced with Forsus group. Similarly, extrusion of upper and lower molars and lower incisors was also seen in both groups.
CONCLUSION: In this study we found TB to have more mandibular lengthening effect as compared to Forsus, and thus was found to be more effective in treatment of Class II cases. How to cite the article: Tarvade SM, Chaudhari CV, Daokar SG, Biday SS, Ramkrishna S, Handa AS. Dentoskeletal comparison of changes seen in class II cases treated by Twin Block and Forsus. J Int Oral Health 2014;6(3):27-31.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Class II malocclusion; Forsus; Twin block

Year:  2014        PMID: 25083029      PMCID: PMC4109257     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Oral Health        ISSN: 0976-1799


  9 in total

1.  Mandibular protraction appliance IV.

Authors:  C M Coelho Filho
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2001-01

2.  The Mandibular Protraction Appliance No. 3.

Authors:  C M Coelho Filho
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1998-06

3.  Clinical applications of the mandibular protraction appliance.

Authors:  C M Coelho Filho
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1997-02

4.  Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.

Authors:  A K Sharma; V Sachdev; A Singla; B C Kirtaniya
Journal:  J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent       Date:  2012 Jul-Sep

5.  A comparision of Twin-block and Forsus (FRD) functional appliance--a cephalometric study.

Authors:  Irfanulla Khan Mahamad; Praveen Kumar Neela; Rohan Mascarenhas; Akhter Husain
Journal:  Int J Orthod Milwaukee       Date:  2012

6.  Mandibular protraction appliances for Class II treatment.

Authors:  C M Coelho Filho
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1995-05

7.  Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in Class II patients.

Authors:  Lorenzo Franchi; Lisa Alvetro; Veronica Giuntini; Caterina Masucci; Efisio Defraia; Tiziano Baccetti
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion.

Authors:  M Firouz; J Zernik; R Nanda
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeffrey L Berger; David S Chermak; Richard Kaczynski; Eugene S Simon; Andre Haerian
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.650

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Second Class Functional Treatment: Andreasen Activator vs Twin Block.

Authors:  Giulia Baccaglione; Elisa Rota; Maurizio Ferrari; Marcello Maddalone
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr

2.  Dentoskeletal effects of the forsus™ fatigue resistance device in the treatment of class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amal I Linjawi; Mona A Abbassy
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2018-02-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.