Literature DB >> 1510043

Dental and orthopedic effects of high-pull headgear in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion.

M Firouz1, J Zernik, R Nanda.   

Abstract

In the present study a prospective cephalometric investigation was undertaken to examine the skeletal and dental effects of the high-pull extraoral appliance, when the resultant force was directed through the level of trifurcation of the maxillary molars. Twelve adolescent patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions were selected for the study. Each patient wore the headgear for a 6-month period, an average of 12 hours a day. A group of untreated adolescent patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions who were in a similar age range, as well as skeletal and dental characteristics were chosen as controls. Lateral cephalometric films were taken before and after the 6-month treatment period, and before and after the observation period in the control group of patients. Our data indicate that by directing the force of the headgear approximately through the center of resistance of the maxillary molars, it is possible to accomplish simultaneously a substantial distal movement of the molars (2.6 +/- 0.6 mm), as well as significant intrusion (0.54 +/- 0.54 mm). In addition, our results demonstrate that the applied force of 500 gm was sufficient to initiate maxillary orthopedic changes in the treated patients. These changes include relative restriction of horizontal and vertical maxillary growth, as well as distal movement (mean: 0.8 mm) of the maxillary anterior border in the treatment group relative to an untreated control group. Such orthopedic changes have been previously described only in association with much higher force levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1510043     DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81053-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  17 in total

1.  Dentoskeletal Comparison of Changes Seen in Class II Cases Treated by Twin Block and Forsus.

Authors:  Suchita Madhukar Tarvade; Charushila Vinay Chaudhari; Sadashiv Gopinath Daokar; Suhas Shriram Biday; Sheetal Ramkrishna; Amit Satish Handa
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-26

2.  Outcomes of different Class II treatments : Comparisons using the American Board of Orthodontics Model Grading System.

Authors:  Hatice Akinci Cansunar; Tancan Uysal
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Midfacial and Dental Changes Associated with Nasal Positive Airway Pressure in Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Craniofacial Conditions.

Authors:  Soleil D Roberts; Hitesh Kapadia; Geoff Greenlee; Maida L Chen
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Long-term skeletal effects of high-pull headgear followed by fixed appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusions.

Authors:  E Erin Bilbo; Steven D Marshall; Karin A Southard; Verrasathpurush Allareddy; Nathan Holton; Allyn M Thames; Marlene S Otsby; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Adherence to instructions and fluctuation of force magnitude in cervical headgear therapy.

Authors:  Tuula Talvitie; Mika Helminen; Susanna Karsila; Reeta Varho; Luca Signorelli; Timo Peltomäki
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Jena; Ritu Duggal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Evaluation of anteroposterior and vertical stability 25 years after Angle class II division 1 treatment with cervical headgear.

Authors:  Sara Ramos Braga Santos; Telma Martins de Araújo; Carlos Jorge Vogel; Márcio Bastos de Oliveira; Marcos Alan Vieira Bittencourt; Emanuel Braga
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  The Class II Carriere Motion appliance.

Authors:  Daniel Areepong; Ki Beom Kim; Donald R Oliver; Hiroshi Ueno
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Evaluation of the Immediate Dentofacial Changes in Late Adolescent Patients Treated with the Forsus(™) FRD.

Authors:  Esen Ali Gunay; Tulin Arun; Didem Nalbantgil
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2011-10

10.  A cephalometric comparative study of class II correction with Sabbagh Universal Spring (SUS(2)) and Forsus FRD appliances.

Authors:  Mehmet Oguz Oztoprak; Didem Nalbantgil; Ayhan Uyanlar; Tulin Arun
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.