Literature DB >> 12637901

Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.

Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh1, Jeffrey L Berger, David S Chermak, Richard Kaczynski, Eugene S Simon, Andre Haerian.   

Abstract

The mandibular anterior repositioning appliance (MARA) is a tooth-borne functional appliance for use in patients with Class II malocclusions; it positions the mandible forward into a Class I occlusion. The aim of this study was to investigate the MARA's dental and skeletal effects on anterior, posterior, and vertical changes in 30 Class II patients. The treatment group consisted of 12 boys with an average age of 11.2 years and 18 girls with an average age of 11.3 years. A pretreatment cephalometric radiograph was taken 2 weeks before treatment, and a posttreatment cephalometric radiograph was taken 6 weeks after removal of the MARA, with an average treatment time of 10.7 months. The mean and standard deviation were calculated for each cephalometric variable, and Student t tests were performed to determine the statistical significance of the changes. The results of the study showed that the MARA produced measurable treatment effects on the skeletal and dental elements of the craniofacial complex. These effects included a considerable distalization of the maxillary molar, a measurable forward movement of the mandibular molar and incisor, a significant increase in mandibular length, and an increase in posterior face height. The effects of the MARA treatment were then compared with those of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances. The treatment results of the MARA were very similar to those produced by the Herbst appliance but with less headgear effect on the maxilla and less mandibular incisor proclination than observed in the Herbst treatment group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12637901     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  21 in total

1.  Modified camouflage therapy in an adult class I patient with TMJ complaints. A case report.

Authors:  Douglas E Toll; Nenad Popović; Jasminka Andjelić; Nicole Drinkuth
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Dentoskeletal Comparison of Changes Seen in Class II Cases Treated by Twin Block and Forsus.

Authors:  Suchita Madhukar Tarvade; Charushila Vinay Chaudhari; Sadashiv Gopinath Daokar; Suhas Shriram Biday; Sheetal Ramkrishna; Amit Satish Handa
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-06-26

3.  Treatment and posttreatment outcomes induced by the Mandibular Advancement Repositioning Appliance; a controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Douglas Edward Toll; Efisio Defraia; Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Mini-implants vs fixed functional appliances for treatment of young adult Class II female patients: a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Madhur Upadhyay; Sumit Yadav; K Nagaraj; Flavio Uribe; Ravindra Nanda
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Class II correction in orthodontic patients utilizing the Mandibular Anterior Repositioning Appliance (MARA).

Authors:  Anil Ardeshna; Frank Bogdan; Shuying Jiang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance in patients with Class II skeletal malocclusions.

Authors:  Marcelo N Kegler Pangrazio; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeffrey L Berger; Burcu Bayirli; Amin Movahhedian
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Treatment effects of twin-block and mandibular protraction appliance-IV in the correction of class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Jena; Ritu Duggal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Dentofacial Effects of Fixed Functional Appliances with or without Mini Screw Anchorage in the Treatment of Class II Division I Malocclusion: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Halil Akış; Cenk Doruk
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-03-01

9.  Treatment and posttreatment effects induced by the Forsus appliance: A controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciatore; Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Lisa Alvetro; Veronica Giuntini; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.

Authors:  Nicole J Siara-Olds; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeff Berger; Burcu Bayirli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.