Literature DB >> 25065910

Expected population impacts of discontinued prostate-specific antigen screening.

Roman Gulati1, Alex Tsodikov, Ruth Etzioni, Rachel A Hunter-Merrill, John L Gore, Angela B Mariotto, Matthew R Cooperberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer has high risks of overdiagnosis, particularly among older men, and reports from screening trials indicate that it saves few lives after 11 to 13 years of follow-up. New clinical guidelines recommend against PSA screening for all men or for men aged >70 years, but, to the authors' knowledge, the expected population effects of these guidelines have not been studied to date.
METHODS: Two models of prostate cancer natural history and diagnosis were previously developed using reconstructed PSA screening patterns and prostate cancer incidence in the United States. Assuming a survival benefit of PSA screening consistent with the screening trials, the authors used the models to predict incidence and mortality rates for the period from 2013 through 2025 under continued PSA screening and under discontinued PSA screening for all men or for men aged >70 years.
RESULTS: The models predicted that continuation of recent screening rates will overdiagnose 710,000 to 1,120,000 men (range between models) but will avoid 36,000 to 57,000 cancer deaths over the period 2013 through 2025. Discontinued screening for all men eliminated 100% of overdiagnoses but failed to prevent 100% of avoidable cancer deaths. Continued screening for men aged <70 years eliminated 64% to 66% of overdiagnoses but failed to prevent 36% to 39% of avoidable cancer deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuing PSA screening for all men may generate many avoidable cancer deaths. Continuing PSA screening for men aged <70 years could prevent greater than one-half of these avoidable cancer deaths while dramatically reducing overdiagnoses compared with continued PSA screening for all ages.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mass screening; models; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; statistical; surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25065910      PMCID: PMC4221407          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28932

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  48 in total

1.  Reconstructing PSA testing patterns between black and white men in the US from Medicare claims and the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Angela B Mariotto; Ruth Etzioni; Martin Krapcho; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Prostate cancer mortality reduction by prostate-specific antigen-based screening adjusted for nonattendance and contamination in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).

Authors:  Monique J Roobol; Melissa Kerkhof; Fritz H Schröder; Jack Cuzick; Peter Sasieni; Matti Hakama; Ulf Hakan Stenman; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis Denis; Franz Recker; Antonio Berenguer; Mirja Ruutu; Paula Kujala; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Teuvo L J Tammela; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Jonas Hugosson; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Theodore L DeWeese; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Lead time and overdiagnosis in prostate-specific antigen screening: importance of methods and context.

Authors:  Gerrit Draisma; Ruth Etzioni; Alex Tsodikov; Angela Mariotto; Elisabeth Wever; Roman Gulati; Eric Feuer; Harry de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Alex Tsodikov; Angela Mariotto; Aniko Szabo; Seth Falcon; Jake Wegelin; Dante DiTommaso; Kent Karnofski; Roman Gulati; David F Penson; Eric Feuer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Men older than 70 years have higher risk prostate cancer and poorer survival in the early and late prostate specific antigen eras.

Authors:  Leon Sun; Arthur A Caire; Cary N Robertson; Daniel J George; Thomas J Polascik; Kelly E Maloney; Philip J Walther; Danielle A Stackhouse; Benjamin D Lack; David M Albala; Judd W Moul
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Impact of PSA screening on the incidence of advanced stage prostate cancer in the United States: a surveillance modeling approach.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Roman Gulati; Seth Falcon; David F Penson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Prostate specific antigen testing among the elderly--when to stop?

Authors:  Edward M Schaeffer; H Ballentine Carter; Anna Kettermann; Stacy Loeb; Luigi Ferrucci; Patricia Landis; Bruce J Trock; E Jeffrey Metter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Effect of population trends in body mass index on prostate cancer incidence and mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Megan Dann Fesinmeyer; Roman Gulati; Steve Zeliadt; Noel Weiss; Alan R Kristal; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening: 1986-2005.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Peter C Albertsen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  41 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: Growth of AS in the USA signals reduction in overtreatment.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Prostate cancer: Personalized risk - stratified screening or abandoning it altogether?

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Overdiagnosis and Lives Saved by Reflex Testing Men With Intermediate Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Todd M Morgan; Teresa A'mar; Sarah P Psutka; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Unscreened older men diagnosed with prostate cancer are at increased risk of aggressive disease.

Authors:  J J Tosoian; R Alam; C Gergis; A Narang; N Radwan; S Robertson; T McNutt; A E Ross; D Y Song; T L DeWeese; P T Tran; P C Walsh
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 5.  The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.

Authors:  Katherine Fleshner; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Prostate cancer: USPSTF screening recommendation could lead to greater numbers of avoidable deaths.

Authors:  Annette Fenner
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Personalized Risks of Over Diagnosis for Screen Detected Prostate Cancer Incorporating Patient Comorbidities: Estimation and Communication.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Sarah P Psutka; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  [Trivialization of prostate cancer? : Stage shift and possible causes].

Authors:  M Saar; M S K M Abdeen; C Niklas; Z T F Al-Kailani; S Siemer; M Stöckle
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Prostate Biopsy Characteristics: A Comparison Between the Pre- and Post-2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines.

Authors:  Navin Shah; Vladimir Ioffe; Thomas Huebner; Ivelina Hristova
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

10.  An Approach Using PSA Levels of 1.5 ng/mL as the Cutoff for Prostate Cancer Screening in Primary Care.

Authors:  E David Crawford; Matt T Rosenberg; Alan W Partin; Matthew R Cooperberg; Michael Maccini; Stacy Loeb; Curtis A Pettaway; Neal D Shore; Paul Arangua; John Hoenemeyer; Mike Leveridge; Michael Leapman; Peter Pinto; Ian M Thompson; Peter Carroll; James Eastham; Leonard Gomella; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.