Literature DB >> 19758616

Men older than 70 years have higher risk prostate cancer and poorer survival in the early and late prostate specific antigen eras.

Leon Sun1, Arthur A Caire, Cary N Robertson, Daniel J George, Thomas J Polascik, Kelly E Maloney, Philip J Walther, Danielle A Stackhouse, Benjamin D Lack, David M Albala, Judd W Moul.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We clarified whether men older than 70 years have a higher risk of prostate cancer and poorer survival in the early and late prostate specific antigen eras.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 4,561 men who underwent radical prostatectomy were stratified into 3 age groups (younger than 60, 60 to 70 and older than 70 years), and early and late prostate specific antigen eras based on the year of surgery (before 2000 and 2000 or later). Race, body mass index, prostate specific antigen, prostate weight, tumor volume, pathological Gleason sum, pathological tumor stage, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion and surgical margin status were submitted for univariate and multivariable analyses against the previously mentioned groups. Survivals (prostate specific antigen recurrence, distant metastasis and disease specific death) were compared among the 3 age groups using univariate and multivariable methods.
RESULTS: Compared with younger age groups (younger than 60, 60 to 70 years) men older than 70 years had a higher proportion of pathological tumor stage 3/4 (33.0 vs 44.3 vs 52.1%, p <0.001), pathological Gleason sum greater than 7 (9.5% vs 13.4% vs 17.2%, p <0.001) and larger tumor volume (3.7 vs 4.7 vs 5.2 cc, p <0.001). Pathological Gleason sum in men older than 70 years did not differ between the early and late prostate specific antigen eras (p = 0.071). Men older than 70 years had a higher risk of prostate specific antigen recurrence, distant metastasis and disease specific death on univariate (p <0.05) but not multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Men older than 70 years had higher risk disease and poorer survival in the early and late prostate specific antigen eras. Pathological Gleason sums did not change between the 2 eras. Patient age was an important variable in prostate specific antigen screening, biopsy, treatment and prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19758616     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  28 in total

1.  Optimizing the management of prostate cancer in senior adults: call to action.

Authors:  John M Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012

2.  Expected population impacts of discontinued prostate-specific antigen screening.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Alex Tsodikov; Ruth Etzioni; Rachel A Hunter-Merrill; John L Gore; Angela B Mariotto; Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Systemic Treatment of Prostate Cancer in Elderly Patients: Current Role and Safety Considerations of Androgen-Targeting Strategies.

Authors:  Myrto Boukovala; Nicholas Spetsieris; Eleni Efstathiou
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Younger patients have poorer biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sung Kyu Hong; Jung Soo Nam; Woong Na; Jong Jin Oh; Cheol Yong Yoon; Chang Wook Jeong; Hyun June Kim; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  [Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in elderly patients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes].

Authors:  D Porres; D Pfister; A P Labanaris; V Zugor; J H Witt; A Heidenreich
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Treatment trends and Medicare reimbursements for localized prostate cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Paolo Dell'oglio; Anne Sophie Valiquette; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Zhe Tian; Vincent Trudeau; Alessandro Larcher; Shahrokh F Shariat; Umberto Capitanio; Alberto Briganti; Markus Graefen; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Prostate biopsy characteristics: A comparison between pre- and post- United States Preventive Service Task Force Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines of 2012.

Authors:  Navin Shah; Thomas Huebner; Vladimir Ioffe; Richard Hum
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

8.  Is radical prostatectomy a useful therapeutic option for high-risk prostate cancer in older men?

Authors:  Markus Graefen; Thorsten Schlomm
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012

9.  Radical radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer in older men.

Authors:  Heather A Payne; Simon Hughes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012

10.  Prostate Biopsy Characteristics: A Comparison Between the Pre- and Post-2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines.

Authors:  Navin Shah; Vladimir Ioffe; Thomas Huebner; Ivelina Hristova
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.