Literature DB >> 30288144

Prostate Biopsy Characteristics: A Comparison Between the Pre- and Post-2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Prostate Cancer Screening Guidelines.

Navin Shah1, Vladimir Ioffe2, Thomas Huebner3, Ivelina Hristova4.   

Abstract

To compare prostate cancer (PCa) characteristics diagnosed by prostate biopsy (Pbx) in the 3 years before and after the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations for PCa screening, we completed a retrospective comparative analysis of 402 sequential PCa patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2012 (3 years) with 552 PCa patients diagnosed from 2015 to 2017 (3 years). Data was collected on patient age, race, total number of biopsies performed, prostate specific antigen (PSA), Gleason sum score (GSS), and digital rectal examination (DRE). The data was analyzed to determine whether the 2012 USPSTF screening recommendations affected PCa characteristics. Two study groups were defined, Group A and Group B, prior to and after the 2012 USPSTF screening recommendations, respectively. In Group A (pre- 2012 USPSTF recommendations), 567 patients/year underwent a Pbx versus Group B, 398 patients/year, a 30% reduction post-USPSTF. The annual positive Pbx rate for Group A is 134/year versus Group B 184/year, a 37.3% increase post-USPSTF. Group A had high-grade PCa (GSS 7-10) in 51.5% versus Group B in 60.1%, an 8.6% increase post-USPSTF. In Group B, the total number of positive biopsies was increased by 100%. This study shows that in Group B, the Pbx rate decreased by 30% but the annual PCa detection rate increased by 37%. High-grade GSS (7-10) PCa increased by 8.6%. Despite a reduction in the total number of prostate biopsies by 30%, there was a 100% increase in the total number of positive prostate biopsies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PSA screening; Prostate cancer; United States Preventive Services Task Force

Year:  2018        PMID: 30288144      PMCID: PMC6168329          DOI: 10.3909/riu0793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Urol        ISSN: 1523-6161


  27 in total

1.  Increasing incidence of metastatic prostate cancer in the United States (2004-2013).

Authors:  A B Weiner; R S Matulewicz; S E Eggener; E M Schaeffer
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Recent Trends in PSA Testing and Prostate Cancer Incidence: A Look at Context.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Roman Gulati
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Reevaluating PSA Testing Rates in the PLCO Trial.

Authors:  Jonathan E Shoag; Sameer Mittal; Jim C Hu
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  The prostate health index selectively identifies clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Martin G Sanda; Dennis L Broyles; Sanghyuk S Shin; Chris H Bangma; John T Wei; Alan W Partin; George G Klee; Kevin M Slawin; Leonard S Marks; Ron H N van Schaik; Daniel W Chan; Lori J Sokoll; Amabelle B Cruz; Isaac A Mizrahi; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.

Authors:  James E Thompson; Daniel Moses; Ron Shnier; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; Lee Ponsky; Marley Pulbrook; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Andrew Hayen; Phillip D Stricker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Impact of the US Preventive Services Task Force Grade D Recommendation: Assessment of Evaluations for Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and Prostate Biopsies in a Large Urology Group Practice Following Statement Revision.

Authors:  Kathleen F McGinley; Gregory C McMahon; Gordon A Brown
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2015

9.  Radical prostatectomy in men aged >or=70 years: effect of age on upgrading, upstaging, and the accuracy of a preoperative nomogram.

Authors:  Lee Richstone; Fernando J Bianco; Hiral H Shah; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Douglas S Scherr
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  Do African-American men need separate prostate cancer screening guidelines?

Authors:  Divya Shenoy; Satyaseelan Packianathan; Allen M Chen; Srinivasan Vijayakumar
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  On the Road to Accurate Protein Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: Current Status and Future Advances.

Authors:  Yiwu Yan; Su Yeon Yeon; Chen Qian; Sungyong You; Wei Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.