Literature DB >> 31531694

[Trivialization of prostate cancer? : Stage shift and possible causes].

M Saar1, M S K M Abdeen2, C Niklas2, Z T F Al-Kailani2, S Siemer2, M Stöckle2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to the strongly negative grade D recommendation of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force in 2012, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test was not only not recommended but was also warned against. As a result in the USA there was a stage shift towards more advanced tumor stages under the newly detected prostate cancers; however, in contrast to the highly questionable American PLCO study, the European ERSPC study showed a clear reduction in prostate cancer-related mortality.
OBJECTIVE: In this patient cohort it was investigated whether the tumor stage distribution in curatively treated prostate cancer has significantly changed, whether this has an influence on the perioperative results and complication rates and how these changes could have occurred.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients after radical prostatectomy from 2008 to 2010 were compared to those from 2017. Demographic data, intraoperative courses, perioperative and postoperative complications and histopathological results were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 1276 operations were analyzed. Preoperative PSA levels showed a significant increase in 2017 (10.5 ± 13.4 ng/ml vs. 8.4 ± 9.1 ng/ml, p = 0.032). The pathological staging revealed a 20% increase in T3 tumors (49.4% versus 29.0%, p < 0.001). Correspondingly, moderately and poorly differentiated cancers and therefore those with higher aggressiveness were significantly more frequent with 11.2% (p < 0.001) and 10.4% (p < 0.001), respectively. The number of patients with lymph node metastases at prostatectomy even increased fourfold (4.5% vs. 16.9%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In the radical prostatectomy group, there was a shift to unfavorable and metastatic tumor stages. This negative trend seems largely to be caused by a lower acceptance of early detection by means of PSA determination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Lymph node metastases; Prostate specific antigen; Prostatectomy; Stage shift

Year:  2019        PMID: 31531694     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-019-01039-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  32 in total

Review 1.  [Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  C Thomas; A Neisius; F C Roos; C Hampel; J W Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Contemporary Patterns of Care and Outcomes of Men Found to Have Lymph Node Metastases at the Time of Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Piotr Zareba; James Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Karim Touijer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Smarter screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Guan Hee Tan; Gregory Nason; Khaled Ajib; Dixon Teck Sing Woon; Jaime Herrera-Caceres; Omar Alhunaidi; Nathan Perlis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Current trends in patient enrollment for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in Belgium.

Authors:  Simone Albisinni; Steven Joniau; Thierry Quackels; Greet De Coster; Peter Dekuyper; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Nancy Van Damme; Elisabeth Van Eycken; Filip Ameye; Thierry Roumeguère
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Antonio Berenguer; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Bert G Blijenberg; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Prostate Needle Biopsy Outcomes in the Era of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation against Prostate Specific Antigen Based Screening.

Authors:  John S Banerji; Erika M Wolff; John D Massman; Katherine Odem-Davis; Christopher R Porter; John M Corman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Marco Zappa; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Liisa Määttänen; Hans Lilja; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Paez; Chris H Bangma; Sigrid Carlsson; Donella Puliti; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Matti Hakama; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Paula Kujala; Kimmo Taari; Gunnar Aus; Andreas Huber; Theo H van der Kwast; Ron H N van Schaik; Harry J de Koning; Sue M Moss; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Rider; Kimmo Taari; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Anders Spångberg; Ove Andrén; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The increase of stage, grading, and metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy during the last decade.

Authors:  Vincent Beck; Boris Schlenker; Annika Herlemann; Maria Apfelbeck; Alexander Buchner; Christian Gratzke; Christian G Stief; Stefan Tritschler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Reconciling the Effects of Screening on Prostate Cancer Mortality in the ERSPC and PLCO Trials.

Authors:  Alex Tsodikov; Roman Gulati; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Paul F Pinsky; Sue M Moss; Sheng Qiu; Tiago M de Carvalho; Jonas Hugosson; Christine D Berg; Anssi Auvinen; Gerald L Andriole; Monique J Roobol; E David Crawford; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marco Zappa; Marcos Luján; Arnauld Villers; Eric J Feuer; Harry J de Koning; Angela B Mariotto; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.