| Literature DB >> 25064006 |
Muhua Wang1, Yeisoo Yu1, Georg Haberer2, Pradeep Reddy Marri3, Chuanzhu Fan4, Jose Luis Goicoechea5, Andrea Zuccolo6, Xiang Song5, Dave Kudrna5, Jetty S S Ammiraju7, Rosa Maria Cossu8, Carlos Maldonado5, Jinfeng Chen9, Seunghee Lee5, Nick Sisneros5, Kristi de Baynast5, Wolfgang Golser5, Marina Wissotski5, Woojin Kim5, Paul Sanchez10, Marie-Noelle Ndjiondjop11, Kayode Sanni11, Manyuan Long12, Judith Carney13, Olivier Panaud14, Thomas Wicker15, Carlos A Machado16, Mingsheng Chen9, Klaus F X Mayer17, Steve Rounsley18, Rod A Wing5.
Abstract
The cultivation of rice in Africa dates back more than 3,000 years. Interestingly, African rice is not of the same origin as Asian rice (Oryza sativa L.) but rather is an entirely different species (i.e., Oryza glaberrima Steud.). Here we present a high-quality assembly and annotation of the O. glaberrima genome and detailed analyses of its evolutionary history of domestication and selection. Population genomics analyses of 20 O. glaberrima and 94 Oryza barthii accessions support the hypothesis that O. glaberrima was domesticated in a single region along the Niger river as opposed to noncentric domestication events across Africa. We detected evidence for artificial selection at a genome-wide scale, as well as with a set of O. glaberrima genes orthologous to O. sativa genes that are known to be associated with domestication, thus indicating convergent yet independent selection of a common set of genes during two geographically and culturally distinct domestication processes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25064006 PMCID: PMC7036042 DOI: 10.1038/ng.3044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Genet ISSN: 1061-4036 Impact factor: 38.330
Figure 1The O. glaberrima genome (CG14 v1).
Concentric circles show structural, functional and evolutionary aspects of the genome: A, chromosome number; B, heat map view of genes; C, repeat (RNA and DNA TEs without MITEs) density in 200-kb windows (red, average +1 s.d.; blue, average −1 s.d.; yellow, gene and repeat density between red and blue); and D paralogous relationships between O. glaberrima chromosomes.
Gene feature statistics of four Oryza genomes
| Feature | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene count | 33,164 | 41,620 | 40,745 | 30,952 |
| Exon count | 142,095 | 171,163 | 170,496 | 141,987 |
| Intron count | 108,931 | 129,543 | 129,751 | 111,035 |
| Gene size (bp) | 2,393 | 2,306 | 2,439 | 2,677 |
| CDS size (bp) | 1,094 | 1,044 | 1,117 | 1,044 |
| Exon size (bp) | 255 | 254 | 267 | 228 |
| Intron size (bp) | 396 | 407 | 416 | 456 |
| Exons per gene | 4.28 | 4.11 | 4.18 | 4.59 |
| tRNA | 701 | 722 | 707 | 516 |
Shown are the gene, exon and intron counts, the sizes of genes, coding regions, exons and introns, the number of exons per gene (shown as mean values) and the number of tRNAs identified in the O. glaberrima genome assembly. For O. sativa ssp. japonica, only non–transposon related genes were used. On average, genes in O. brachyantha are larger than those in the other three species, a result that is driven by larger introns. CDS, coding DNA sequence.
Figure 2Population structure analysis of 94 O. barthii accessions.
(a) Population structure of 94 O. barthii accessions inferred using ADMIXTURE[23]. Each color represents one population. The length of each segment in each vertical bar represents the proportion contributed by ancestral populations. The O. barthii population is partitioned into four subgroups (OB-I, OB-II, OB-III and OB-V), as well as an admixed group (OB-IV). (b) PCA of 94 O. barthii accessions using all identified SNPs as markers. The O. barthii accessions from the same subgroup are clustered together. (c) NJ phylogenetic tree of 94 O. barthii accessions.
Figure 3Identification of the domestication center of O. glaberrima.
(a) NJ phylogenetic tree of 20 O. glaberrima and 94 O. barthii accessions. All but one of the O. glaberrima accessions (black) are clustered with O. barthii accessions from group OB-V (green). (b) The proportion of each group of O. barthii accessions originating from different countries in Africa. All O. barthii accessions collected from the countries in the proposed domestication center (highlighted in black) are from the OB-V and OB-IV admixture groups. The proportion of O. barthii from the OB-V and OB-IV admixture groups found in each country decreased with distance from the domestication center, whereas the O. barthii accessions from other subgroups showed the opposite trend.
Figure 4Identification of candidate regions of artificial selection during O. glaberrima domestication.
Plot of the composite likelihood ratio (CLR) across O. glaberrima genome. The red dashed line indicates the cutoff value for the 0.5% outlier regions with significant deviations from neutrality, indicating evidence of recent selective sweeps.
Figure 5Sequence comparisons of OsSh1 and Sh4.
(a) Orthologous gene relationship of the OsSh1 region of O. sativa ssp. japonica (Os) with those of O. barthii (Ob) and O. glaberrima (Og). The 45-kb deletion (red triangle) resulted in the complete removal of the OsSh1 ortholog and three additional genes in O. glaberrima (red rectangle). Inversion is indicated with blue arrows. U and D represent upstream and downstream genes relative to OsSh1, respectively (U1, LOC_Os03g44680; U2, LOC_Os03g44690; OsSh1, LOC_Os03g44710; D1, LOC_Os03g44720; D2, LOC_Os03g44740; D3, LOC_Os03g44750; D4, LOC_Os03g44760; D5, LOC_Os03g44780). (b) Sequence comparison of Sh4 of O. sativa ssp. japonica and O. glaberrima. Two insertions (Ins) and three deletions (Del) of O. glaberrima compared to O. sativa ssp. japonica are shown as brown triangles and blue triangles, respectively. Ten SNPs are labeled a–j. The causative mutation (f) of the non-shattering phenotype in O. sativa is highlighted in red. This mutation did not exist in O. glaberrima.