OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to evaluate single-source dual-energy CT (DECT) for distinguishing benign and indeterminate adrenal nodules, with attention to the effects of phase of IV contrast enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review revealed 273 contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT examinations from November 2009 through March 2012. Fifty adrenal nodules 0.8 cm or larger were identified in 41 patients (22 women and 19 men; average age, 66 years; age range, 36-88 years). CT postprocessing and measurements were independently performed by two radiologists (readers 1 and 2) for each nodule, as follows: attenuation (in Hounsfield units) on true unenhanced images; contrast-enhanced attenuation (in Hounsfield units) on monochromatic spectral images at 40, 75, and 140 keV; and contrast-enhanced material density (in milligrams per milliliter) on virtual unenhanced images. Nodules were classified as benign (< 10 HU) and indeterminate (≥ 10 HU) according to true unenhanced images. RESULTS: Interreader agreement regarding benign and indeterminate nodules was high (κ = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.8-1.0). At 140 keV, the attenuation of benign nodules was significantly lower (reader 1, 7.0 ± 12.5 HU; reader 2, 7.8 ± 9.2 HU) than that of indeterminate nodules (reader 1, 15.7 ± 20.5 HU [p = 0.004]; reader 2, 17.5 ± 13.4 HU [p < 0.0001]). On virtual unenhanced images, benign nodules had significantly lower material density (reader 1, 992.4 ± 9.9 mg/mL; reader 2, 992.7 ± 9.6 mg/mL) than did indeterminate nodules (reader 1, 1001.1 ± 20.5 mg/mL [p = 0.038]; reader 2, 1007.6 ± 13.4 mg/mL [p < 0.0001]). CONCLUSION: DECT tools can mathematically subtract iodine or minimize its effects in high-energy reconstructions, approximating unenhanced imaging and potentially reducing the need for additional studies to triage adrenal nodules detected on contrast-enhanced DECT examinations.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to evaluate single-source dual-energy CT (DECT) for distinguishing benign and indeterminate adrenal nodules, with attention to the effects of phase of IV contrast enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review revealed 273 contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT examinations from November 2009 through March 2012. Fifty adrenal nodules 0.8 cm or larger were identified in 41 patients (22 women and 19 men; average age, 66 years; age range, 36-88 years). CT postprocessing and measurements were independently performed by two radiologists (readers 1 and 2) for each nodule, as follows: attenuation (in Hounsfield units) on true unenhanced images; contrast-enhanced attenuation (in Hounsfield units) on monochromatic spectral images at 40, 75, and 140 keV; and contrast-enhanced material density (in milligrams per milliliter) on virtual unenhanced images. Nodules were classified as benign (< 10 HU) and indeterminate (≥ 10 HU) according to true unenhanced images. RESULTS: Interreader agreement regarding benign and indeterminate nodules was high (κ = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.8-1.0). At 140 keV, the attenuation of benign nodules was significantly lower (reader 1, 7.0 ± 12.5 HU; reader 2, 7.8 ± 9.2 HU) than that of indeterminate nodules (reader 1, 15.7 ± 20.5 HU [p = 0.004]; reader 2, 17.5 ± 13.4 HU [p < 0.0001]). On virtual unenhanced images, benign nodules had significantly lower material density (reader 1, 992.4 ± 9.9 mg/mL; reader 2, 992.7 ± 9.6 mg/mL) than did indeterminate nodules (reader 1, 1001.1 ± 20.5 mg/mL [p = 0.038]; reader 2, 1007.6 ± 13.4 mg/mL [p < 0.0001]). CONCLUSION: DECT tools can mathematically subtract iodine or minimize its effects in high-energy reconstructions, approximating unenhanced imaging and potentially reducing the need for additional studies to triage adrenal nodules detected on contrast-enhanced DECT examinations.
Authors: Chad M Miller; Rajan T Gupta; Erik K Paulson; Amy M Neville; Mustafa R Bashir; Elmar M Merkle; Daniel T Boll Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Michael Toepker; Thomas Moritz; Bernhard Krauss; Michael Weber; Gordon Euller; Thomas Mang; Florian Wolf; Christian J Herold; Helmut Ringl Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2012-01-10 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Ralph Gnannt; Michael Fischer; Robert Goetti; Christoph Karlo; Sebastian Leschka; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Ravi K Kaza; Joel F Platt; Richard H Cohan; Elaine M Caoili; Mahmoud M Al-Hawary; Ashish Wasnik Journal: Radiographics Date: 2012 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Lincoln L Berland; Stuart G Silverman; Richard M Gore; William W Mayo-Smith; Alec J Megibow; Judy Yee; James A Brink; Mark E Baker; Michael P Federle; W Dennis Foley; Isaac R Francis; Brian R Herts; Gary M Israel; Glenn Krinsky; Joel F Platt; William P Shuman; Andrew J Taylor Journal: J Am Coll Radiol Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.532
Authors: Ross Edward Taylor; Pamela Mager; Nam C Yu; David P Katz; Jett R Brady; Nakul Gupta Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-10-07 Impact factor: 3.039