S E Gilman1, E J Bromet2, K L Cox3, L J Colpe4, C S Fullerton5, M J Gruber6, S G Heeringa7, L Lewandowski-Romps7, A M Millikan-Bell3, J A Naifeh5, M K Nock8, M V Petukhova6, N A Sampson6, M Schoenbaum9, M B Stein10, R J Ursano5, S Wessely11, A M Zaslavsky6, R C Kessler6. 1. Departments of Social and Behavioral Sciences, and Epidemiology,Harvard School of Public Health,Boston, MA,USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science,Stony Brook School of Medicine,Stony Brook, NY,USA. 3. US Army Public Health Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground,MD,USA. 4. Division of Services and Intervention Research,National Institute of Mental Health,Bethesda, MD,USA. 5. Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Department of Psychiatry,Uniformed Services University School of Medicine,Bethesda, MD,USA. 6. Department of Health Care Policy,Harvard Medical School,Boston, MA,USA. 7. Institute for Social Research,University of Michigan,Ann Arbor, MI,USA. 8. Department of Psychology,Harvard University,Cambridge, MA,USA. 9. Office of Science Policy, Planning and Communications,National Institute of Mental Health,Bethesda, MD,USA. 10. Departments of Psychiatry and Family and Preventive Medicine,University of California San Diego,La Jolla, CA,USA. 11. King's Centre for Military Health Research,King's College London,London,UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The US Army suicide rate has increased sharply in recent years. Identifying significant predictors of Army suicides in Army and Department of Defense (DoD) administrative records might help focus prevention efforts and guide intervention content. Previous studies of administrative data, although documenting significant predictors, were based on limited samples and models. A career history perspective is used here to develop more textured models. METHOD: The analysis was carried out as part of the Historical Administrative Data Study (HADS) of the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS). De-identified data were combined across numerous Army and DoD administrative data systems for all Regular Army soldiers on active duty in 2004-2009. Multivariate associations of sociodemographics and Army career variables with suicide were examined in subgroups defined by time in service, rank and deployment history. RESULTS: Several novel results were found that could have intervention implications. The most notable of these were significantly elevated suicide rates (69.6-80.0 suicides per 100 000 person-years compared with 18.5 suicides per 100 000 person-years in the total Army) among enlisted soldiers deployed either during their first year of service or with less than expected (based on time in service) junior enlisted rank; a substantially greater rise in suicide among women than men during deployment; and a protective effect of marriage against suicide only during deployment. CONCLUSIONS: A career history approach produces several actionable insights missed in less textured analyses of administrative data predictors. Expansion of analyses to a richer set of predictors might help refine understanding of intervention implications.
BACKGROUND: The US Army suicide rate has increased sharply in recent years. Identifying significant predictors of Army suicides in Army and Department of Defense (DoD) administrative records might help focus prevention efforts and guide intervention content. Previous studies of administrative data, although documenting significant predictors, were based on limited samples and models. A career history perspective is used here to develop more textured models. METHOD: The analysis was carried out as part of the Historical Administrative Data Study (HADS) of the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers (Army STARRS). De-identified data were combined across numerous Army and DoD administrative data systems for all Regular Army soldiers on active duty in 2004-2009. Multivariate associations of sociodemographics and Army career variables with suicide were examined in subgroups defined by time in service, rank and deployment history. RESULTS: Several novel results were found that could have intervention implications. The most notable of these were significantly elevated suicide rates (69.6-80.0 suicides per 100 000 person-years compared with 18.5 suicides per 100 000 person-years in the total Army) among enlisted soldiers deployed either during their first year of service or with less than expected (based on time in service) junior enlisted rank; a substantially greater rise in suicide among women than men during deployment; and a protective effect of marriage against suicide only during deployment. CONCLUSIONS: A career history approach produces several actionable insights missed in less textured analyses of administrative data predictors. Expansion of analyses to a richer set of predictors might help refine understanding of intervention implications.
Authors: Nigel E Bush; Mark A Reger; David D Luxton; Nancy A Skopp; Julie Kinn; Derek Smolenski; Gregory A Gahm Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2013-01-17
Authors: Ian R H Rockett; Michael D Regier; Nestor D Kapusta; Jeffrey H Coben; Ted R Miller; Randy L Hanzlick; Knox H Todd; Richard W Sattin; Leslie W Kennedy; John Kleinig; Gordon S Smith Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Alexander J Millner; Robert J Ursano; Irving Hwang; Andrew J King; James A Naifeh; Nancy A Sampson; Alan M Zaslavsky; Murray B Stein; Ronald C Kessler; Matthew K Nock Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2017-06-20
Authors: Anthony J Rosellini; John Monahan; Amy E Street; Eric D Hill; Maria Petukhova; Ben Y Reis; Nancy A Sampson; David M Benedek; Paul Bliese; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler; Murray B Stein; James A Naifeh; Matthew K Nock; Pablo A Aliaga; Carol S Fullerton; Gary H Wynn; Tsz Hin Hinz Ng; Hieu M Dinh; Nancy A Sampson; Tzu-Cheg Kao; Michael Schoenbaum; James E McCarroll; Kenneth L Cox; Steven G Heeringa Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2016-11-29
Authors: Robert J Ursano; Lisa J Colpe; Steven G Heeringa; Ronald C Kessler; Michael Schoenbaum; Murray B Stein Journal: Psychiatry Date: 2014 Impact factor: 2.458
Authors: Jessica D Ribeiro; Peter M Gutierrez; Thomas E Joiner; Ronald C Kessler; Maria V Petukhova; Nancy A Sampson; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Matthew K Nock Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2017-04
Authors: Robert J Ursano; James A Naifeh; Ronald C Kessler; Oscar I Gonzalez; Carol S Fullerton; Holly Herberman Mash; Charlotte A Riggs-Donovan; Tsz Hin Hinz Ng; Gary H Wynn; Hieu M Dinh; Tzu-Cheg Kao; Nancy A Sampson; Steven G Heeringa; Murray B Stein Journal: Psychiatry Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 2.458
Authors: A E Street; S E Gilman; A J Rosellini; M B Stein; E J Bromet; K L Cox; L J Colpe; C S Fullerton; M J Gruber; S G Heeringa; L Lewandowski-Romps; R J A Little; J A Naifeh; M K Nock; N A Sampson; M Schoenbaum; R J Ursano; A M Zaslavsky; R C Kessler Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: James A Naifeh; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler; Pablo A Aliaga; Holly B Herberman Mash; Carol S Fullerton; Tsz Hin Hinz Ng; Hieu M Dinh; Oscar I Gonzalez; Cara M Stokes; Gary H Wynn; Tzu-Cheg Kao; Nancy A Sampson; Murray B Stein Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2019-09-23
Authors: Lisa Lewandowski-Romps; Heather M Schroeder; Patricia A Berglund; Lisa J Colpe; Kenneth Cox; Keith Hauret; Jeffrey D Hay; Bruce Jones; Roderick J A Little; Colter Mitchell; Michael Schoenbaum; Paul Schulz; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Steven G Heeringa Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler; Murray B Stein; James A Naifeh; Pablo A Aliaga; Carol S Fullerton; Gary H Wynn; Patti L Vegella; Tsz Hin Hinz Ng; Bailey G Zhang; Christina L Wryter; Nancy A Sampson; Tzu-Cheg Kao; Lisa J Colpe; Michael Schoenbaum; James E McCarroll; Kenneth L Cox; Steven G Heeringa Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 21.596